Cost benefit analysis of inert gas systems for chemical and product tankers

Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering - OMAE

Volumn 2, Issue , 2009, Pages 651-660

  Thomas, Martyn ^a   Skjong, Rolf ^a  

^a DNV GL   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT STATISTIC; CARGO TANKS; CHEMICAL TANKERS; CONVENTIONAL OIL; COST BENEFITS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTIONS; FIRE AND EXPLOSION; FLASH POINTS; FORMAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT; INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATIONS; MANDATORY REQUIREMENT; POTENTIAL LOSS; PRODUCT TANKERS; RISK REDUCTIONS;

ACCIDENTS; ARCTIC ENGINEERING; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS; COST REDUCTION; EXPLOSIONS; FLUE GASES; INDICATORS (CHEMICAL); INERT GASES; OCEANOGRAPHY; RISK PERCEPTION; SHIPS; WATERWAY TRANSPORTATION;

OIL TANKERS;

EID: 77952814162     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/OMAE2009-79919     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Foyn-Bruun, S., Odfjell Operation Support: Odfjell Voyage Data 2006, via email 17 September 2008
2. Foyn-Bruun, S., Odfjell Operation Support: IGS capacity requirements, personnel communication during meeting at NMD in Haugesund, 23 September 2008
3. Foyn-Bruun, S., Odfjell Operation Support: Opinion on fatalities due to entry into inerted cargo tanks, personal communication via email, 10 November 2008
4. nd Ed.): International Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk & Index of Dangerous Chemicals Carried in Bulk (IBC Code), IMO
5. International Maritime Organisation (IMO), (2002): Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment for use in the IMO Rule Making Process, MSC/Circ.1023 (MEPC/Circ.392)
6. International Maritime Organisation (IMO), (2006): Amendments to the Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) for Use in the IMO Rule Making Process, MSC - MEPC.2/Circ 5 (MSC/Circ.1023 -MEPC/Circ.392)
7. International Maritime Organisation (IMO), (2006): Report of the Maritime Safety Committee on its Eighty-First Session, MSC 81/25
8. International Maritime Organisation (IMO), (2006): Study on Incidents of Explosions on Chemical and Product Tankers, Report of the Activities of the Inter-Industry Working Group (IIWG), MSC 81/8/1
9. International Maritime Organisation (IMO), (2006): Study on Incidents of Explosions on Chemical and Product Tankers, MSC 81/INF.8, Submitted by Inter-Industry Working Group (IIWG)
10. International Maritime Organisation (IMO) (2007): Analysis of the costs and benefits of the application of requirements for inert gas systems to tankers of less than 20,000dwt using Net CAF, FP 52/INF.2, Submitted by Japan
11. International Maritime Organisation (IMO), (2008): General Cargo Ship Safety, MSC 85/19/1, Submitted by Germany, Norway and IACS
12. Intertanko, Cost Benefit Impact Inert Gas Intertanko Statement to Norwegian Maritime Directorate, 28 October 2008
13. Mun, Y. H., DSME Site Office: IGS costs at new build, via email 26 September 2008
14. Normann, O., Odfjell Management AS: IGS maintenance costs, via email 20 October 2008
15. Norway (2000): MSC 72/16, Formal Safety Assessment, Decision Parameters including Risk Acceptance Criteria, Submitted by Norway to IMO, 2000
16. Odfjell (2008): Safety and Quality Management System: Safety at Work, via email 4 November 2008
17. Russi, P., Stolt Nielsen S.A.: Stolt Nielsen Voyage Data 2006-2008, via email 3 October 2008
18. Skjong, R., Vanem, E. & Endersen, O. (2005): Risk Evaluation Criteria, SAFEDOR Deliverable D.4.5.2, Submitted to MSC 81 by Denmark, www.safedor.org
19. Spouge, J. R., (2007): A Simple Model of the Costs of Ship Accidents (Rev 4), DNV Core Class Development Project
20. Tsichlis, P., Kristen Navigation Inc.: IGS costs at new build, via email 16 October 2008
21. Vanem, E., Endersen, O. & Skjong, R. (2008): Cost Effectiveness Criteria for Marine Oil Spill Preventative Measures, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 93/9, pp. 1354-1368