The management of incidental findings in neuro-imaging research: Framework and recommendations

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 117-126

  Rangel, Erica K ^a  

^a RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ETHICS; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INCIDENTAL FINDING; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MORALITY; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; PATIENT REFERRAL; RESEARCH ETHICS;

DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DISCLOSURE; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMANS; INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; MORAL OBLIGATIONS; NERVOUS SYSTEM DISEASES; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION;

EID: 77952801252     PISSN: 10731105     EISSN: 1748720X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2010.00471.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Wolf S. Managing Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Analysis and Recommendations. Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics 2008, 36(no. 2):219-248. at 219
2. Vernooij M W. Incidental Findings in Brain MRI in the General Population. New England Journal of Medicine 2007, 357(no. 18):1821-1828. S. Kumra et al., " Ethical and Practical Considerations in the Management of Incidental Findings in Pediatric MRI Studies," 45, no. 8 (2006): 1000-1006; J. Illes et al., " Ethical Consideration of Incidental Findings on Adult Brain MRI in Research," 62, no. 6 (2004): 888-890; F. Weber and H. Knopf, " Incidental Findings in Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brains of Healthy Young Men," 240, no. 1 (2006): 81-84
3. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, , U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C., 1979
4. Emanuel E, Wendler D, Grady C. What Makes Clinical Research Ethical?. Journal of the American Medical Association 2000, 283(no. 20):2701-2711. at 2701
5. Fried C. Medical Experimentation: Personal Integrity and Social Policy 1974, Amsterdam, North Holland Publishing Company
6. Weijer C, Miller P B. Therapeutic Obligation in Clinical Research. The Hastings Center Report 2003, 33(no. 3):3-4. C. H. Coleman, " Duties to Subjects in Clinical Research," 58, no. 2 (2005): 387-449; B. Freedman, K. C. Glass, and C. Weijer, " Placebo Orthodoxy in Clinical Research. II: Ethical, Legal and Regulatory Myths," 24, no. 3 (2007): 252-259, at 253
7. Morreim H. The Clinical Investigator as Fiduciary: Discarding a Misguided Idea. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 2005, 33(no. 3):586-598.
8. Illes J. Practical Approaches to Incidental Findings in Brain Imaging Research. Neurology 2008, 70(no. 5):384-390. T. Beauchamp and J. Childress, , 5th ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001): at 173-176
9. Miller F G, Mello M M, Joffe S. Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: What do Investigators Owe Participants?. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 2008, 36(no. 2):271-279.
10. Richardson H S, Belsky L. Medical Researchers' Ancillary Clinical Care Responsibilities. BMJ 2004, 328(no. 7454):1494-1496. Richardson and Belsky also recognize that all moral agents, not just clinicians or researchers, have the duty to rescue those in need, at least when one can provide the help without serious sacrifice or risk. For a philosophically compelling defense of a duty to rescue, see T. M. Scanlon, (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998). Richardson and Belsky's ancillary care duties are those that lie beyond these general duties to rescue and are specially incumbent on human subject researchers, H. S. Richardson and L. Belsky, " The Ancillary Care Responsibilities of Medical Researchers: An Ethical Framework for Thinking about the Clinical Care That Researchers Owe Their Subjects," 34, no. 1 (2004): 25-33
11. (Richardson and Belsky, " Medical Researchers' Ancillary Clinical Care Responsibilities" ), at 26
12. As will be addressed later in the paper, I distinguish between anticipated and unanticipated IFs. Ancillary care will only create obligations for unanticipated IFs, while other research ethics standards will govern anticipated IFs
13. See Richardson and Belsky, " Medical Researchers' Ancillary Clinical Care Responsibilities," note 12, at 27
14. See Weijer and Miller, note 8
15. See Emanuel et al., note 4
16. Miller F G, Brody H. A Critique of Clinical Equipoise: Therapeutic Misconception in the Ethics of Clinical Trials. Hastings Center Report 2003, 33(no. 3):19-28. at 26
17. Richardson H S. Incidental Findings and Ancillary Care Obligations. Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics 2008, 36(no. 2):256-270. at 259
18. Royal J M, Peterson B S. The Risks and Benefits of Searching for Incidental Findings in MRI Research Scans. Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics 2008, 36(no. 2):305-314. at 306
19. Katzman G, Dagher A P, Patronas N J. Incidental Findings on Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging from 1000 Asymptomatic Volunteers. JAMA 1999, 282(no. 1):36-39. at 36
20. Illes J, Desmond J E, Huang L F, Raffin T A, Atlas S W. Ethical and Practical Considerations in Managing Incidental Findings in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Brain and Cognition 2002, 50(no. 3):358-365. B. S. Kim, J. Illes, R. T. Kaplan, A. Reiss, and S. W. Atlas, " Neurologic Findings on Brain Magnetic Imaging from 1000 Asymptomatic Volunteers," 282, no. 1 (2002): 36-39; see Katzman et al., note 23; J. Illes, B. S. Kim, R. T. Kaplan, A. Reiss, and S. W. Atlas, " Neurologic Findings in Healthy Children on Pediatric fMRI: Incidence and Significance," 23, no. 1 (2002): 1-4
21. Illes J, Chin V N. Bridging Philosophical and Practical Implications of Incidental Findings in Brain Research. Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics 2008, 36(no. 2):298-304. at 303
22. See Wolf et al., note 1; NIH Conference Proceedings, , 2005; see Royal and Peterson, note 22
23. Parker L. The Future of Incidental Findings: Should They Be Viewed as Benefits?. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 2008, 36(no. 2):341-351.
24. King N M P. Defining and Describing Benefit Appropriately in Clinical Trials. Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics 2000, 28(no. 4):332-343. at 338
25. See Emanuel et al., note 4, at 2706
26. 45 CRR 46.116, 2007; 21 CFR 50.20, 2007