Process evaluation of the project P.A.T.H.S. (Secondary 2 Program): Findings based on the co-walker scheme

Adolescence

Volumn 44, Issue 176, 2009, Pages 813-825

  Shek, Daniel T L ^a   Tam, Suet Yan ^a  

^a HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH EDUCATION; HONG KONG; HUMAN; MULTICENTER STUDY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHILOSOPHY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICE;

ADOLESCENT; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH PLAN IMPLEMENTATION; HOLISTIC HEALTH; HONG KONG; HUMANS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICES;

EID: 77952775078     PISSN: 00018449     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Catalano, R. G., Berglund, M. L., Ryan, J. A. M., Lonczak, H. S., & Hawkins, J. D. (2002). Positive youth development in the United States: Research findings on evaluations of positive youth development programs.. Prevention and Treatment, 5 (1).
2. Dane, A. V., & Schneider, B. H. (1998). Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: Are implementation effects out of control? Clinical Psychology Review, 18, 23-45.
3. Domitrovich, C. E., & Greenberg, M. T. (2000). The study of implementation: Current findings from effective programs that prevent mental disorders in school-aged children.. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 11(2), 193-221.
4. Dusenbury, L., Brannigan, R., Falco, M., & Hansen, W. B. (2003). A review of research on fidelity of implementation: Implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings.. Health Education Research, 18(2), 237-256.
5. Dusenbury, L., Brannigan, R., Hansen, W. B., Walsh, J., & Falco, M. (2005). Quality of implementation: Developing measures crucial to understanding the diffusion of preventive interventions.. Health Education Research, 20(3), 308-313.
6. Giles, S., Jackson-Newsom, J., Pankratz, M. M., Hansen, W. B., Ringwalt, C. L., & Dusenbury, L. (2008). Measuring quality of delivery in a substance use prevention program. Journal of Primary Prevention, 29, 489-501.
7. Hansen, W. B., & McNeal, R. B. (1999). Drug education practice: Results of an observational study. Health Education Research, 14, 85-97.
8. Hunter, L., Elias, M. J., & Norris, J. (2001). School-based violence prevention: Challenges and lessons learned from an action research project. Journal of School Psychology, 39(2), 161-175.
9. Melde, C., Esbensen, F., & Tusinski, K. (2006). Addressing program fidelity using onsite observations and program provider descriptions of program delivery.. Evaluation Review, 30(6), 714-740.
10. Nation, M., Crusto, C., Wandersman, A., Kumpfer, K. L., Seybolt, D., Morrissey-Kane, E., & Davino, K (2003). What works in prevention: Principles of effective prevention programs. American Psychologist, 58(6/7), 449-456.
11. Shek, D. T. L. (2006a). Construction of a positive youth development program in Hong Kong. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 18(3), 299-302.
12. Shek, D. T. L. (2006b). Effectiveness of the Tier 1 Program of the Project P. A. T. H. S.: Preliminary objective and subjective outcome evaluation findings. TheScientific WorldJOURNAL, 6, 1466-1474.
13. Shek, D. T. L. (2009). Using students' weekly diaries to evaluate positive youth development programs: The case of Project P. A. T. H. S.. in Hong Kong. Adolescence, 44, 69-85.
14. Shek, D. T. L., & Lee, T. Y. (2008). Qualitative evaluation of the Project PA. T. H. S.: Findings based on focus groups with student participants.. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 20(4), 449-462.
15. Shek, D. T. L., Lee, T. Y., Siu, A., & Lam, C. M. (2006). Qualitative evaluation of the Project P. A. T. H. S.based on the perceptions of the program participants. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL, 6, 2254-2263.
16. Shek, D. T. L., Lee, T. Y., & Sun, R. C. F. (2008). Process evaluation of the implementation of the Secondary 2 Program of Project PA. T. H. S.in the Experimental Implementation Phase. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL, 8, 83-94.
17. Shek, D. T. L., & Ma, H. K. (2006). Design of a positive youth development program in Hong Kong. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 18(3), 315-327.
18. Shek, D. T. L., & Ma, H. K. (2007). Subjective outcome evaluation of the Project P. A. T. H. S.: Findings based on the perspective of the program participants.. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL, 7, 47-55.
19. Shek, D. T. L., & Ma, H. K. (2008). Evaluation of Project PA. T. H. S. (Secondary 1 Program) by the program implementers: Findings based on the Full Implementation Phase. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL, 8, 976-979.
20. Shek, D. T. L., Ma, H. K., Lui, J. H. Y., & Lung, D. W. M. (2006). Process evaluation of the Tier 1 Program of the Project P. A. T. H. S. TheScientific WorldJOURNAL, 8, 536-546.
21. Shek, D. T. L., Ma, H. K., & Sun, R. C. F. (2008). Interim evaluation of the Tier 1 Program (Secondary 1 Curriculum) of the Project PA. T. H. S.: First year of the Full Implementation Phase.. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL, 8, 47-60.
22. Shek, D. T. L., Ma, H. K., Sun, R. C. F., & Lung, D. W. M. (2008). Process evaluation of the Tier 1 Program (Secondary 1 Curriculum) of the Project P. A. T. H. S.: Findings based on the Full Implementation Phase.. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL, 8, 35-46.
23. Shek, D. T. L., Siu, A., & Lee, T. Y. (2007). Subjective outcome evaluation of the Project PA. T. H. S.: Findings based on the perspective of the program implementers.. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL, 7, 195-203.
24. Shek, D. T. L., Siu, A., Lee, T. Y., Cheung, C. K., & Chung, R. (2008). Effectiveness of the Tier 1 Program of Project PA. T. H. S.: Objective outcome evaluation based on a randomized group trial.. TheScientificWorld JOURNAL, 8, 4-12.
25. Shek, D. T. L., & Sun, R. C. F. (2006). Implementation of the Tier 1 Program of the Project P. A. T. H. S.: Interim evaluation findings. TheScientific WorldJOURNAL, 6, 2274-2284.
26. Shek, D. T. L., & Sun, R. C. F. (2007a). Subjective outcome evaluation of the Project P. A. T. H. S.: Qualitative findings based on the experiences of program implementers. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL, 7, 1024-1035.
27. Shek, D. T. L., & Sun, R. C. F. (2007b). Subjective outcome evaluation of the Project P. A. T. H. S.: Qualitative findings based on the experiences of the program participants. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL, 7, 686-697.
28. Shek, D. T. L., & Sun, R. C. F. (2008a). Evaluation & Project P. A. T. H. S. (Secondary/Program) by the program participants: Findings based on the Full Implementation Phase, Adolescence, 172(43), 807-822.
29. Shek, D. T. L., & Sun, R. C. F. (2008b). Implementation quality of a positive youth development program: Cross-case analyses based on seven cases in Hong Kong. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL, 8, 1075-1087.
30. Shek, D. T. L., Sun, R. C. F., & Chan, C. W. Y. (2008). Evaluation of Project PA. T. H. S. (Secondary 2 Program) by the program participants: Findings based on the Experimental Implementation Phase. The Scientific World Journal, 8, 526-535.
31. Shek, D. T. L., Sun, R. C. F., & Lung, D. W. M. (2008). Evaluation of Project PA. T. H. S. (Secondary 2 Program) by the program implementers: Findings based on the Experimental Implementation Phase. The Scientific World Journal, 6, 2264-2273.
32. Shek, D. T. L., Sun, R. C. F., Lam, C. M., Lung, D. W. M., & Lo, S. C. (2008). Evaluation of Project PA. T. H. S.in Hong Kong: Utilization of student weekly diary. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL, 8, 13-21.
33. Shek, D. T. L., Sun, R. C. F., & Siu, A. (2008). Interim evaluation of the Tier 1 Program (Secondary 1 Curriculum) of the Project P. A. T. H. S.: First year of the Full Implementation Phase.. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL, 8, 61-72.