Guidelines for the placement of fiducial points in image-guided neurosurgery

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 142-149

  Wang, Manning ^a   Song, Zhijian ^a  

^a FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Distribution of fiducial points; Image guided neurosurgery; Point pair registration; Target registration error

Indexed keywords

ERRORS;

CLINICAL PRACTICES; DISTRIBUTION OF FIDUCIAL POINT; FIDUCIAL POINTS; IMAGE GUIDED NEURO SURGERIES; IMAGE SPACE; IMAGE-GUIDED NEUROSURGERY; POINT-PAIR REGISTRATION; REGISTRATION ACCURACY; TARGET POINT; TARGET REGISTRATION ERRORS;

NEUROSURGERY;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FIDUCIAL POINT; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGING; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; NEUROSURGERY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REGISTRATION; BRAIN; DEVICES; HUMAN; PATIENT POSITIONING; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOTHERAPY; SURGERY;

BRAIN; HUMANS; IMAGERY (PSYCHOTHERAPY); NEUROSURGERY; NEUROSURGICAL PROCEDURES; PATIENT POSITIONING;

EID: 77952766673     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.299     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Gumprecht HK, Widenka DC, Lumenta CB. BrainLab vectorvision neuronavigation system: technology and clinical experiences in 131 cases. Neurosurgery 1999; 44(1): 97-104.
2. Grunert P, Darabi K, Espinosa J, et al. Computer-aided navigation in neurosurgery. Neurosurg Rev 2003; 26(2): 73-99.
3. Raabe A, Krishnan R, Seifert V. Actual aspects of image-guided surgery. Surg Technol Int 2003; 11: 314-319.
4. Peters TM. Image guidance for surgical procedures. Phys Med Biol 2006; 51(14): 505-540.
5. Eggers G, Muhling J, Marmulla R. Image-to-patient registration techniques in head surgery. Int J Oral Max Surg 2006; 35(12): 1081-1095. (Pubitemid 44718385)
6. Marmulla R, Muehling J, Lueth T, et al. Physiological shift of facial skin and its influence on the change in precision of computer-assisted surgery. Br J Oral Max Surg 2006; 44(4): 273-278. (Pubitemid 43923716)
7. Schlaier J, Warnat J, Brawanski A. Registration accuracy and practicability of laser-directed surface matching. Comput Aided Surg 2002; 7(5): 284-290. (Pubitemid 36182803)
8. Raabe A, Krishnan R, Wolff R, et al. Laser surface scanning for patient registration in intracranial image-guided surgery. Neurosurgery 2002; 50(4): 797-801.
9. Eggert DW, Lorusso A, Fisher RB. Estimation 3D rigid body transformation: a comparison of four major algorithms. Machine Vision Applic 1997; 9: 272-290. (Pubitemid 127561575)
10. Fitzpatrick JM, West JB. The distribution of target registration error in rigid-body point-based registration. IEEE Trans Med Imag 2001; 20(9): 917-927.
11. West JB, Fitzpatrick JM, Toms SA, et al. Fiducial point placement and the accuracy of point-based, rigid body registration. Neurosurgery 2001; 48(4): 810-816.
12. Wang MN, Song ZJ. Improving target registration accuracy in image-guided neurosurgery by optimizing the distribution of fiducial points. Int J Med Robot Comp 2009; 5(1): 26-31.
13. Liu HS, Yu Y, Schell MC, et al. Optimal marker placement in photogrammetry patient positioning system. Med Phys 2003; 30(2): 103-110. (Pubitemid 36222844)
14. Atuegwu NC, Galloway RL. Sensitivity analysis of fiducial placement on transorbital target registration error. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2008; 2: 397-404.