Current status of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of coronary vasculature

Canadian Journal of Cardiology

Volumn 26, Issue SUPPLA, 2010, Pages 51A-55A

  Friedrich, Matthias G ^a  

^a FOOTHILLS HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance; Coronary arteries; Myocardial perfusion

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; ATHEROSCLEROTIC PLAQUE; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CARDIOVASCULAR FUNCTION; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY BLOOD VESSEL; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; HEART MUSCLE OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHY; REVIEW;

CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY VESSELS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY;

EID: 77952753648     PISSN: 0828282X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0828-282X(10)71063-1     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Razzouk L, Farkouh M. Imaging outcomes in cardiovascular clinical trials. Nat Rev Cardiol 2009;1-8.
2. Sanz J, Moreno PR, Fuster V. Update on advances in atherothrombosis. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2007;4:78-89.
3. Achenbach S. Computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1919-28.
4. Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA 2007;298:317-23.
5. Gerber T, Carr J, Arai A, et al. Ionizing radiation in cardiac imaging: A science advisory from The American Heart Association Committee on Cardiac Imaging of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention. Circulation 2009;119:1056-65.
6. Kim WY, Danias PG, Stuber M, et al. Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1863-9.
7. Gerber BL, Coche E, Pasquet A, et al. Coronary artery stenosis: Direct comparison of four-section multi-detector row CT and 3D navigator MR imaging for detection - initial results. Radiology 2005;234:98-108.
8. Yang Q, Li K, Liu X, et al. Contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0-T: A comparative study with X-ray angiography in a single center. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:69-76.
9. Hendel R, Patel M, Kramer C, et al. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006. Appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1475-97.
10. Bluemke DA, Achenbach S, Budoff M, et al. Noninvasive coronary artery imaging: Magnetic resonance angiography and multidetector computed tomography angiography: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease in the Young. Circulation 2008;118:586-606.
11. Fearon WF, Aarnoudse W, Pijls NH, et al. Microvascular resistance is not influenced by epicardial coronary artery stenosis severity: Experimental validation. Circulation 2004;109:2269-72.
12. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2009;360:213-24.
13. Hochman JS, Lamas GA, Buller CE, et al. Coronary intervention for persistent occlusion after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2395-407.
14. Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1503-16.
15. Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Maron DJ, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: Results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation 2008;117:1283-91.
16. Schwitter J, Wacker C, Van Rossum A, et al. MR-IMPACT: Comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with singlephoton emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multivendor, randomized trial. Eur Heart J 2008;29:480-89.
17. Jahnke C, Nagel E, Gebker R, et al. Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance stress tests: Adenosine stress perfusion and dobutamine stress wall motion imaging. Circulation 2007;115:1769-76.
18. Pilz G, Klos M, Ali E, Hoefling B, Scheck R, Bernhardt P. Angiographic correlations of patients with small vessel disease diagnosed by adenosine-stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2008;10:8.
19. Naghavi M. From Vulnerable Plaque to Vulnerable Patient: A call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I. Circulation 2003;108:1664-72.
20. Naghavi M. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: A call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part II. Circulation 2003;108:1772-8.
21. Yuan C, Mitsumori LM, Ferguson MS, et al. In vivo accuracy of multispectral magnetic resonance imaging for identifying lipid-rich necrotic cores and intraplaque hemorrhage in advanced human carotid plaques. Circulation 2001;104:2051-6.
22. Fuster V, Kim RJ. Frontiers in cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation 2005;112:135-44.
23. Kim WY, Astrup AS, Stuber M, et al. Subclinical coronary and aortic atherosclerosis detected by magnetic resonance imaging in type 1 diabetes with and without diabetic nephropathy. Circulation 2007;115:228-35.
24. Niendorf T, Sodickson DK. Highly accelerated cardiovascular MR imaging using many channel technology: Concepts and clinical applications. Eur Radiol 2008;18:87-102.
25. Harloff A, Albrecht F, Spreer J, et al. 3D blood flow characteristics in the carotid artery bifurcation assessed by flow-sensitive 4D MRI at 3T. Magn Reson Med 2009;61:65-74.
26. Abdel-Aty H, Zagrosek A, Schulz-Menger J, et al. Delayed enhancement and T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging differentiate acute from chronic myocardial infarction. Circulation 2004;109:2411-6.
27. Stork A, Lund GK, Muellerleile K, et al. Characterization of the peri-infarction zone using T2-weighted MRI and delayedenhancement MRI in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Eur Radiol 2006;16:2350-7.
28. Friedrich MG, Abdel-Aty H, Taylor A, Schulz-Menger J, Messroghli D, Dietz R. The salvaged area at risk in reperfused acute myocardial infarction as visualized by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:1581-7.
29. Abdel-Aty H, Cocker M, Meek C, Tyberg J, Friedrich M. Edema as a very early marker for acute myocardial ischemia: A cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:1194-201.
30. Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1445-53.
31. Bernhardt P, Engels T, Knuf B, Strohm O. Cardiac magnetic resonance in outpatients in Germany - indications, complications and protocol suggestions from a high-volume center. Int J Cardiol 2006;111:86-91.
32. Cury RC, Shash K, Nagurney JT, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance with T2-weighted imaging improves detection of patients with acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department. Circulation 2008;118:837-44.
33. McGavock JM, Lingvay I, Zib I, et al. Cardiac steatosis in diabetes mellitus: A 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Circulation 2007;116:1170-5.
34. Rijzewijk LJ, van der Meer RW, Smit JW, et al. Myocardial steatosis is an independent predictor of diastolic dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1793-9.
35. Buchthal SD, den Hollander JA, Merz CN, et al. Abnormal myocardial phosphorus-31 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in women with chest pain but normal coronary angiograms. N Engl J Med 2000;342:829-35.
36. Hudsmith LE, Neubauer S. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in myocardial disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:87-96.
37. Tang TY, Howarth SP, Miller SR, et al. Correlation of carotid atheromatous plaque inflammation using USPIO-enhanced MR imaging with degree of luminal stenosis. Stroke 2008;39:2144-7.
38. Spuentrup E, Ruhl KM, Botnar RM, et al. Molecular magnetic resonance imaging of myocardial perfusion with EP-3600, a collagen-specific contrast agent: Initial feasibility study in a swine model. Circulation 2009;119:1768-75.
39. Bauer WR, Nadler W, Bock M, et al. The relationship between the BOLD-induced T(2) and T(2)(*): A theoretical approach for the vasculature of myocardium. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:1004-10.
40. Friedrich MG, Niendorf T, Schulz-Menger J, Gross CM, Dietz R. Blood oxygen level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging in patients with stress-induced angina. Circulation 2003;108:2219-23.
41. Wacker CM, Hartlep AW, Pfleger S, Schad LR, Ertl G, Bauer WR. Susceptibility-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging detects human myocardium supplied by a stenotic coronary artery without a contrast agent. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:834-40.
42. Dharmakumar R, Arumana J, Tang R, Harris K, Zhang Z, Li D. Assessment of regional myocardial oxygenation changes in the presence of coronary artery stenosis with balanced SSFP imaging at 3.0T: Theory and experimental evaluation in canines. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;27:1037-45.
43. Utz W, Jordan J, Niendorf T, et al. Blood oxygen level-dependent MRI of tissue oxygenation. Relation to endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent blood flow changes. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2005;7:1408-13.
44. Voehringer M, Sechtem U, Friedrich M. Magnetic resonance imaging in vascular biology. Artery Research 2008;2:9-20.
45. Calcagno C, Cornily J-C, Hyafil F, et al. Detection of neovessels in atherosclerotic plaques of rabbits using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI and 18F-FDG PET. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2008;28:1311-7.
46. Sinusas A, Bengel F, Nahrendorf M, et al. Multimodality Cardiovascular Molecular Imaging, Part I. Circulation. Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;1:244-56.
47. Machann J, Schlemmer HP, Schick F. Technical challenges and opportunities of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging at 3T. Phys Med 2008;24:63-70.
48. Friedrich MG. Tissue characterization of acute myocardial infarction and myocarditis by cardiac magnetic resonance. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;1:652-62.