Bulk elastic properties of chicken embryos during somitogenesis

BioMedical Engineering Online

Volumn 9, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Agero, Ubirajara ^a,b   Glazier, James A ^a   Hosek, Michael ^a  

^a Biocomplexity Institute   (United States)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTERIOR-POSTERIOR DIRECTIONS; BULK ELASTIC PROPERTIES; CHICK EMBRYO; CHICKEN EMBRYO; ELASTIC REGION; FINITE ELEMENT SIMULATIONS; FORCE CONSTANTS; HAMILTONS; IN-PLANE FORCE; MICRO-PIPETTE; SOMITOGENESIS; TISSUE DISPLACEMENT; YOUNG'S MODULUS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTICITY; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

ELASTIC MODULI;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHICK EMBRYO; CHICKEN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; MECHANICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; SOMITE; YOUNG MODULUS;

ANIMALS; CHICK EMBRYO; CHICKENS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTIC MODULUS; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SOMITES; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 77952741469     PISSN: 1475925X     EISSN: 1475925X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1475-925X-9-19     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Kulesa PM, Fraser SE. Cell dynamics during somite boundary formation revealed by time-lapse analysis. Science 2002, 298:991-995. 10.1126/science.1075544, 12411697.
2. Pourquie O. The chick embryo: a leading model in somitogenesis studies. Mechanisms of Development 2004, 121:1069-1079. 10.1016/j.mod.2004.05.002, 15296972.
3. Hamburger V, Hamilton HL, Hamburger V, Hamilton HL. A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. 1951. Dev Dyn 1992, 195:231-272.
4. Dubrulle J, McGrew MJ, Pourquié O. FGF signaling controls somite boundary position and regulates segmentation clock control of spatiotemporal Hox gene activation. Cell 2001, 106:219-232. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00437-8, 11511349.
5. Sato Y, Yasuda K, Takahashi Y. Morphological boundary forms by a novel inductive event mediated by Lunatic fringe and Notch during somitic segmentation. Development 2002, 129:3633-3644.
6. Cooke J, Zeeman EC. A clock and wavefront model for control of the number of repeated structures during animal morphogenesis. J Theor Biol 1976, 58:455-476. 10.1016/S0022-5193(76)80131-2, 940335.
7. Baker RE, Schnell S, Maini PK. Formation of Vertebral Precursors: Past Models and Future Predictions. J Theoretical Medicine 2003, 5:23-35.
8. Psychoyos D, Stern CD. Fates and migratory routes of primitive streak cells in the chick embryo. Development 1996, 122:1523-1534.
9. Schoenwolf GC, Garcia-Martinez V, Dias MS. Mesoderm movement and fate during avian gastrulation and neurulation. Dev Dyn 1992, 193:235-248.
10. Selleck MAJ, Stern CD. Commitment of mesoderm cells in Hensen's node of the to notochord and somite. Development 1992, 114:403-415.
11. Engler AJ, Griffin MA, Sen S, Bönnemann CG, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness: pathological implications for soft or stiff microenvironments. J Cell Biol 2004, 166:877-887. 10.1083/jcb.200405004, 2172122, 15364962.
12. Aegerter-Wilmsen T, Aegerter CM, Hafen E, Basler K. Model for the regulation of size in the wing imaginal disc of Drosophila. Mech Dev 2007, 124:318-326. 10.1016/j.mod.2006.12.005, 17293093.
13. Day C. Mechanical force may determine the final size of tissues. Physics Today 2007, 60:20-21.
14. Rath B, Nam J, Knobloch TJ, Lannutti JJ, Agarwal S. Compressive forces induce osteogenic gene expression in calvarial osteoblasts. J Biomech 2008, 41:1095-1103. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.11.024, 2291547, 18191137.
15. Green JB, Dominguez I, Davidson LA. Self-organization of vertebrate mesoderm based on simple boundary conditions. Dev Dyn 2004, 231:576-581. 10.1002/dvdy.20163, 15376320.
16. Keller R, Davidson LA, Shook DR. How we are shaped: the biomechanics of gastrulation. Differentiation 2003, 71:171-205. 10.1046/j.1432-0436.2003.710301.x, 12694202.
17. Brodland GW. Do lamellipodia have the mechanical capacity to drive convergent extension?. Int J Dev Biol 2006, 50:151-155. 10.1387/ijdb.052040gb, 16479484.
18. Davidson LA, Koehl MA, Keller R, Oster GF. How do sea urchins invaginate? Using biomechanics to distinguish between mechanisms of primary invagination. Development 1995, 121:2005-2018.
19. Drasdo D, Forgacs G. Modeling the interplay of generic and genetic mechanisms in cleavage, blastulation, and gastrulation. Dev Dyn 2000, 219:182-191. 10.1002/1097-0177(200010)219:2<182::AID-DVDY1040>3.3.CO;2-1, 11002338.
20. Zhoui J, Kim H, Davidson LA. Actomyosin stiffens the vertebrate embryo during crucial stages of elongation and neural tube closure. Development 2009, 136:677-88. 10.1242/dev.026211, 2685957,2685957, 19168681.
21. Forgacs G, Foty RA, Shafrir Y, Steinberg MS. Viscoelastic properties of living embryonic tissues: a quantitative study. Biophys J 1998, 74:2227-2234. 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77932-9, 1299566, 9591650.
22. Moore SW, Keller RE, Koehl MA. The dorsal involuting marginal zone stiffens anisotropically during its convergent extension in the gastrula of Xenopus laevis. Development 1995, 121:3131-3140.
23. Wiebe C, Brodland GW. Tensile properties of embryonic epithelia measured using a novel instrument. J Biomech 2005, 38:2087-2094. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.09.005, 16084209.
24. Zamir EA, Taber LA. On the effects of residual stress in microindentation tests of soft tissue structures. J Biomech Eng 2004, 126:276-283. 10.1115/1.1695573, 15179859.
25. Murayama Y, Constantinou CE, Omata S. Micro-mechanical sensing platform for the characterization of the elastic properties of the ovum via uniaxial measurement. J Biomech 2004, 37:67-72. 10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00242-2, 14672569.
26. Adrian RJ. Twenty years of particle image velocimetry. Experiments in Fluids 2005, 39:159-169.
27. Godoy-Diana R, Aider JL, Wesfreid JE. Transitions in the wake of a flapping foil. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 2008, 77:016308.
28. Munevar S, Wang Y, Dembo M. Traction force microscopy of migrating normal and H-ras transformed 3T3 fibroblasts. Biophys J 2001, 80:1744-1757. 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76145-0, 1301364, 11259288.
29. Sabass B, Gardel ML, Waterman CM, Schwarz US. High resolution traction force microscopy based on experimental and computational advances. Biophys J 2008, 94:207-220. 10.1529/biophysj.107.113670, 2134850, 17827246.
30. Timoshenko S, N GJ. Theory of Elasticity 1951, MacGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.
31. Sadd MH. Elasticity: Theory, Applications, and Numerics 2005, New York: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
32. Green DP. Mammalian sperm cannot penetrate the zona pellucida solely by force. Exp Cell Res 1987, 169:31-38. 10.1016/0014-4827(87)90221-7, 3817018.
33. Jain MK, Chernomorsky A, Silver FH, Berg RA. Material properties of living soft tissue composites. J Biomed Mater Res 1988, 22:311-326. 10.1002/jbm.820221409, 3235466.
34. Chapman SC, Collignon J, Schoenwolf GC, Lumsden A. Improved method for chick whole-embryo culture using a filter paper carrier. Dev Dyn 2001, 220:284-289. 10.1002/1097-0177(20010301)220:3<284::AID-DVDY1102>3.0.CO;2-5, 11241836.
35. Tirado MM, Garciadelatorre J. Translational Friction Coefficients of Rigid, Symmetric Top Macromolecules - Application to Circular-Cylinders. Journal of Chemical Physics 1979, 71:2581-2587.