Transition of accessibility evaluation tools to new standards

W4A 2009 - International Cross Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 36-45

  Aizpurua, Amaia ^a   Arrue, Myriam ^a   Vigo, Markel ^a   Abascal, Julio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

Author keywords

Automatic evaluation; Guidelines; Web accessibility

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY EVALUATION; AUTOMATIC EVALUATION; AUTOMATIC TOOLS; EVALUATION FRAMEWORK; GUIDELINES; SEMI-AUTOMATICS; TRANSITION PROCESS; WEB ACCESSIBILITY;

WEBSITES;

EID: 77952695363     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1535654.1535662     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Chisholm, W., Vanderheiden, G., and Jacobs, I. (Eds.). (1999, May 5). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. (W3C Recommendation). Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/
2. Freed, G., Rothberg, M., and Wlodkowski, T. (2003). Making Educational Software and Web Sites Accessible. Available at http://ncam.wgbh.org/cdrom/guideline/
3. Kurniawan, S., and Zaphiris, P. (2005). Research-derived web design guidelines for older people. Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, ASSETS'05, 129-135. ACM Press.
4. Rabin, J., and McCathieNevile, C. (Eds.). (2008, July 29). Mobile Web Best Practices (W3C Recommendation). http://www.w3.org/TR/mobile-bp/
5. Caldwell, B., Cooper, M., Guarino Reid, L., and Vanderheiden, G. (Eds.). (2008, December 11). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (W3C Recommendation). Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/
6. Ivory, M.Y., and Hearst M.A. (2001). The state of art in automating usability evaluations of user interfaces. ACM Computing Surveys 33(4), 470-516. ACM Press.
7. Brajnik, G. (2004). Comparing accessibility evaluation tools: a method for tool effectiveness. Universal Access in the Information Society 3(3-4), 252-263. Springer.
8. Ivory, M. Y., Mankoff, J., and Le, A. (2003). Using Automated Tools to Improve Web Site Usage by Users with Diverse Abilities. Information Technology and Society 1(3), 195-236. SIQSS.
9. Brajnik, G. (2000). Automatic web usability evaluation: what needs to be done? In Proceedings of the 6th Human Factors and the Web Conference.
10. Abou-Zahra, S. (Ed.). (2006). Selecting Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools. Available at http://www.w3.org/WAI/eval/selectingtools
11. Xiong, J., Farenc, C., and Winckler, M. (2007). Analyzing Tool Support for Inspecting Accessibility Guidelines During the Development Process of Web Sites. WISE Workshops 2007. LNCS 4832, 470-480. Springer.
12. Brinck, T., Hermann, D., Minnebo, B., and Hakim, A. (2002). AccessEnable: A Tool for Evaluating Compliance with Accessibility Standards. In Automatically Evaluating the Usability of Web Sites, CHI'02 Workshop.
13. Beirekdar, A., Vanderdonckt, J., and Noirhomme-Fraiture, M. (2002). KWARESMI-Knowledge-based Web Automated Evaluation with Reconfigurable Guidelines Optimization. In Proceedings of 9th International Workshop on Design, Specification, and Verification of Interactive Systems DSV-IS 2002. 362-376.
14. Beirekdar, A., Vanderdonckt, J., and Noirhomme-Fraiture, M. (2002). A Framework and a Language for Usability Automatic Evaluation of Web Sites by Static Analysis of HTML Source Code. Chapter 29, Conference on Computer-Aided Design of User Interfaces, CADUI'02, 337-348. Kluwer.
15. Vanderdonckt, J., and Bereikdar, A. (2005). Automated Web Evaluation by Guideline Review. Journal of Web Engineering. Rinton Press 4(2), 102-117. Rinton Press.
16. Leporini, B., Paternò, F., and Scorcia, A. (2006). Flexible tool support for accessibility evaluation. Interacting with Computers 18(5), 869-890. Elsevier.
17. Abascal, J., Arrue, M., Fajardo, I., Garay, N., and Tomás, J. (2004). Use of Guidelines to automatically verify web accessibility. Universal Access in the Information Society 3(1), 71-79. Springer.
18. Arrue, M., Vigo, M., and Abascal, J. (2008). Including Heterogeneous Web Accessibility Guidelines in the Development Process. Engineering Interactive Systems, EIS'07. LNCS 4940, 620-637. Springer.
19. Takata, Y., Nakamura, T., and Seki, H. (2004). Accessibility Verification of WWW Documents by an Automatic Guideline Verification Tool. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
20. Luque, V., Delgado, C., Gaedke, M., and Nussbaumer, M. (2005). WCAG Formalization with W3C Techniques. Web Engineering. LNCS 3579, 615-617. Springer.
21. Vanderdonckt, J. (1999). Development milestones towards a tool for working with guidelines. Interacting with Computers 12(2), 81-118. Elsevier.
22. Abascal, J., and Nicolle, C. (2001). Why Inclusive Design Guidelines? In J. Abascal, C. Nicolle (Eds.), Inclusive Design Guidelines for HCI, Chapter 1, 3-13. Taylor & Francis.
23. Mariage, C., Vanderdonckt, J., and Pribeanu, C. (2005). State of the Art of Web Usability Guidelines. In Proctor, R. and Vu, K. (Eds.). The Handbook of Human Factors in Web Design, Chapter 38, 688-700. Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. IBM Accessibility Center: Developer guidelines for Web Accessibility. Available at http://www-306.ibm.com/able/guidelines/web/accessweb.html
25. Grammenos, D., Akoumianakis, D., and Stephanidis, C (2000). Integrated support for working with guidelines: the Sherlock guideline management system. Interacting with Computers 12(3), 281-311. Elsevier.
26. Leporini, B., Paternò, F., and Scorcia, A. (2006). An Environment for Defining and Handling Guidelines for the Web. ICCHP'06. LNCS 4061, 176-183. Springer.