The use of guidelines to automatically verify web accessibility

Universal Access in the Information Society

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 71-79

  Abascal, Julio ^a   Arrue, Myriam ^a   Fajardo, Inmaculada ^a   Garay, Nestor ^a   Tomás, Jorge ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

Author keywords

Automatic accessibility verification; Inclusive design guidelines; Web accessibility; Web services; XML structures

Indexed keywords

DESIGN; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE); TRANSPORTATION; WEB DESIGN; WEBSITES; XML;

INCLUSIVE DESIGN; KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE; WEB ACCESSIBILITY; XML STRUCTURES;

WEB SERVICES;

EID: 33644598635     PISSN: 16155289     EISSN: 16155297     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10209-003-0069-3     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Sonicon Corporation (2004) ALT Repair Kit
2. Beirekdar A, Vanderdonckt J, Noirhomme-Fraiture M (2002) KWARESMI—Knowledge-based Web Automated Evaluation with REconfigurable guidelineS optiMIzation. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Design, Specification, and Verification of Interactive Systems DSV-IS’2002, Rostock, Germany, 12–14 June 2002
3. Brinck T, Hermann D, Minnebo B and Hakim A (2002) AccessEnable: a tool for evaluating compliance with accessibility standards. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Automatically Evaluating the Usability of Web Sites (CHI 2002), Minneapolis, MN, 21–22 April 2002
4. Balbo S (1995) Automatic evaluation of user interface usability: dream or reality? In: Proceedings of the QCHI’95 Symposium, Bond University, Australia, August 1995
5. Clarck D, Dardailler D (1999) Accessibility on the Web: evaluation and repair tools to make it possible. In: Proceedings of the CSUN Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conferences, Los Angeles, CA, 17–23 March 1999 . Colorfield Insight (2002) Available at http://www.colorfield.com/index.html. Cited 2003
6. Dörner D, Wearing A (1995) Complex problem solving: toward a computer simulated theory. In: Frensch P, Funke J (eds) Complex problem solving: the European perspective, Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
7. Duckett J, Griffin O, Mohr S, Norton F, Stokes-Rees I, Williams K, Cagle K, Ozu N and Tennison J (2001) Professional XML schemas. Wrox, Chicago
8. Ellis RD, Jankowski TB, Jasper JE, and Tharuvai BS (1998) Listener: a tool for client-side investigation of hypermedia navigation behavior. Behav Res Meth Instru Comp 30(6):573–582
9. Engelen JJ (2001) Guidelines for Web accesibility. In: Nicolle C, Abascal J (eds) Inclusive design guidelines for HCI, Taylor & Francis, London
10. Etgen M, Cantor J (1999) What does getting WET (Web eventlogging tool) mean for Web usability? http://zing.ncsl.nist.gov/hfweb/proceedings/etgen-cantor/index.html. Cited 3 June 1999
11. Fajardo I, Can˜ as JJ, Antolı´ A and Salmero´ n L (2002) Web cognitive accessibility for deaf users. In: Proceedings of 3 Congreso Internacional Interaccio´ n’2002, Madrid, Spain, 8–10 May 2002
12. Galbraith B, Tost A, Irani R, Basha J, Hendricks M, Modi T, Milbery J and Cable S (2002) Professional Java Web services. Wrox, Chicago
13. Goffinet L, Noirhomme-Fraiture M (2000) Managing HCI guidelines with hypertext on the WWW. In: Nicolle C, Abascal J (eds) Inclusive design guidelines for HCI, Taylor & Francis, London
14. HTTP-ANALYZE (1999)http://www.netstore.de/Supply/httpanalyze/.Cited 11 December 2002
15. Ivory M, Hearts M (2001) The state of the art in automating usability evaluation of user interfaces. ACM Comp Surv (33)4:470–516
16. Jankowski TB, Jarrod EJ, Tharuvai BS and Ellis RD (1998) Listener v1.1: an AppleScript application. Behav Res Meth Instrum Comp November
17. Paganelli L, Paterno` F (2002) Intelligent analysis of user interactions with Web applications. In: Proceedings of ACM IUI 2002. San Francisco, CA, 9–12 January 2000
18. Paterno F, Ballardin G (2000) RemUSINE: a bridge between empirical and model-based evaluation when evaluators and users are distant. Interact Comp 13(2):151–167
19. Ratner JA, Grose E, Forsythe CG (1996) Characterization and assessment of HTML style guides. In: Proceedings of CHI’96, Vancouver, Canada, 13–18 April 1996
20. Ridpath C, Treviranus J (2002) Integrated accessibility evaluation and repair (The development of A-prompt). In: Proceedings ot the Workshop on Automatically Evaluating the Usability of Web Sites (CHI 2002), Minneapolis, MN, 21–22 April 2002
21. Sears A (1995) AIDE: a step toward metric-based interface development tools. In: Proceedings of the Eighth ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, ACM Press, New York
22. Seeman L (2002) Inclusion of cognitive disabilities in the Web accessibility movement. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh International World Wide Web Conference, Honolulu, HI, 7–11 May 2002
23. Scholtz J, Laskowski S (1998) Developing usability tools and techniques for designing and testing Web sites. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Human Factors and the Web, Basking Ridge, NJ, June 1998
24. Theng YL, Rigny C, Thimbleby H and Jones M (1997) HyperAT: HCI and Web authoring. In: Proceedings of BCS HCI’97, Bristol, UK, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
25. US Federal IT Accessibility Initiative (Section 508). http://www.section508.gov/
26. USABLE NET (2000) LIFT ON LINE. http://www.usablenet.com. Cited 2003
27. Vanderheiden GC, Chisholm WA, Ewers N and Dunphy S (1997) Unified Web Site Accessibility Guidelines, Version 7.2. Trace R&D Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison
28. W3C CSS Validator (1998) Available at http://validator.w3.org
29. W3C HTML (2000) Available at http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator
30. Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) (2003) http://www.w3.org/WAI. Cited 6 November 2003
31. XML (2003) http://www.w3.org/XML. Cited 20 August 2003
32. XML Schema (2003) http://www.w3.org/XML/Schema. Cited 24 November 2003
33. Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) (2003) http://www.w3.org/WAI. Cited 6 November 2003
34. XML (2003) http://www.w3.org/XML. Cited 20 August 2003
35. XML Schema (2003) http://www.w3.org/XML/Schema. Cited 24 November 2003