Demystifying phenotypes: The comparative genomics of evo-devo

Fly

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 18-20

  Artieri, Carlo G ^a,b   Singh, Rama S ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES   (United States)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Comparative genomics; Developmental constraint; Evo devo; Ontogeny; Selection opportunity

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952683165     PISSN: 19336934     EISSN: 19336942     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/fly.4.1.10509     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Gould SJ. Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press 1977.
2. Raff R A. The Shape of Life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press 1996.
3. Gilbert SF, Opitz JM, Raff R A. Resynthesizing evo-lutionary and developmental biology. Dev Biol 1996; 173:357-72.
4. Carroll SB. Evo-devo and an expanding evolutionary synthesis: A genetic theory of morphological evolu-tion. Cell 2008; 134:25-36.
5. Sumrall CD, Wray GA. Ontogeny in the fossil record: diversification of body plans and the evolu-tion of "aberrant" symmetry in Paleozoic echino-derms. Paleobiology 2007; 33:149-63.
6. Johnson NA, Porter AH. Toward a new synthesis: population genetics and evolutionary developmental biology. Genetica 2001; 112:45-58.
7. Artieri CG, Haerty W, Singh RS. Ontogeny and phylogeny: molecular signatures of selection, con-straint and temporal pleiotropy in the development of Drosophila. BMC Biol 2009; 7:42.
8. Von Baer KE. Entwicklungsgeschichte der Tiere: Beobachtung und Relexion. Königsberg. Germany: Bornträger 1828.
9. Pearson JC, Lemons D, McGinnis W. Modulating Hox gene functions during animal body patterning. Nat Rev Genet 2005; 6:893-904.
10. Pontius JU, Wagner L, Schuler GD. UniGene: a unified view of the transcriptome. In: The NCBI handbook. Bethesda, MD: National Center for Biotechnology Information 2003.
11. Drosophila 12 Genomes Consortium. Evolution of genes and genomes on the Drosophila phylogeny. Nature 2007; 450:203-18.
12. Darwin C. On the origin of species by means of natu-ral selection, or, the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life, 6th edition. New York, NY: The Modern Library 1872.
13. Castillo-Davis CI, Hartl DL. Genome evolution and developmental constraint in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol Biol Evol 2002; 19:728-35.
14. Cutter AD, Ward S. Sexual and temporal dynamics of molecular evolution in C. elegans development. Mol Biol Evol 2005; 22:178-88.
15. Davis JC, Brandman O, Petrov DA. Protein evolu-tion in the context of Drosophila development. J Mol Evol 2005; 60:774-85.
16. Cruickshank T, Wade MJ. Microevolutionary sup-port for a developmental hourglass: gene expression patterns shape sequence variation and divergence in Drosophila. Evol Dev 2008; 10:583-90.
17. Garfield DA, Wray GA. Comparative embryology without a microscope: using genomic approaches to understand the evolution of development. J Biol 2009; 8: 65.
18. Arthur W. Biased Embr yos and Evolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press 2004.