Cognitive process modeling of spatial ability: The assembling objects task

Intelligence

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 324-335

  Ivie, Jennifer L ^a   Embretson, Susan E ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Assembling objects; Cognitive process modeling; Eye tracking; Spatial ability

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952672480     PISSN: 01602896     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2010.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Ball L.J., Quayle J.D. The effects of belief and logic in syllogistic reasoning: Evidence from an eye-tracking analysis. Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society: August 19-21, 1999 1999, 49-54. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. M. Hahn, S.C. Stoness (Eds.).
2. Bertera J.H., Rayner K. Eye movements and the span of the effective stimulus in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics 2000, 62(3):576-585.
3. Bethell-Fox C.E., Lohman D.F., Snow R.E. Adaptive reasoning: Componential and eye movement analysis of geometric analogy performance. Intelligence 1984, 8:205-238.
4. Carey N.B. Computer predictors of mechanical job performance: Marine Corps. Military Psychology 1994, 6:1-30.
5. Carstens C.B., Huskins E., Hounshell G.W. Listening to Mozart may not enhance performance on the Revised Minnesota Paper Form Board Test. Psychological Reports 1995, 77:111-114.
6. Cocude M., Mellet E., Denis M. Visual and mental exploration of visuo-spatial configurations: Behavioral and neuroimaging approaches. Psychological Research 1999, 62:93-106.
7. Cooper L.A., Shephard R.N. Chronometric studies of the rotation of mental images. Visual information processing 1973, Academic Press, New York. W.G. Chase (Ed.).
8. Cronbach L.J., Meehl P.E. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin 1955, 52:281-302.
9. Denis M., Cocude M. On the metric properties of visual images generated from verbal descriptions: Evidence for the robustness of the mental scanning effect. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 1997, 9(4):353-379.
10. Dreze X., Hussherr F.-X. Internet advertising: Is anybody watching?. Journal of Interactive Marketing 2003, 17(4):8-16.
11. Embretson S. Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span. Psychological Bulletin 1983, 93:179-197.
12. Embretson S.E. Cognitive psychology applied to testing. Handbook of applied cognition 1999, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, New York. F.T. Durso, R.S. Nickerson, R.W. Schvaneveldt, S.T. Dumais, D.S. Lindsay, M.T.H. Chi (Eds.).
13. Embretson S.E. Generating assembling objects items from cognitive specifications: Final Report (Subcontract No. SubPR98-1 2000, Human Resources Research Organization, Alexandria, VA.
14. Embretson S.E., Gorin J. Improving construct validity with cognitive psychology principles. Journal of Educational Measurement 2001, 38(4):343-368.
15. Embretson S.E., Reise S.P. Item response theory for psychologists 2000, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishing, Mahwah, NJ.
16. Fischer G.H., Ponocny-Seliger E. Structural Rasch Modeling: Handbook of the usage of LPCM-WIN 1.0 1998, ProGAMMA, Groningen.
17. Fischer G.H. The linear logistic test model as an instrument in educational research. Act Psychologica 1973, 37:359-374.
18. Gardner H. Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences 1983, Basic Books, New York.
19. Gorin J.S. Test design with cognition in mind. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 2006, 25(4):21-35.
20. Gorin, J.S. (2006b). Using alternative data sources to inform item difficulty modeling. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Educational Measurement, San Francisco, California.
21. Guilford J.P. The nature of human intelligence 1967, McGraw-Hill, New York.
22. Hoffman J.E. Visual attention and eye movements. Attention 1998, NetLibrary, Boulder, CO. H. Pashler (Ed.).
23. Humphreys L.G., Lubinski D., Yao G. Utility of predicting group membership and the role of spatial visualization in becoming an engineer, physical scientist, or artist. Journal of Applied Psychology 1993, 78(2):250-261.
24. Johnson S.P., Johnson K.L. Early perception-action coupling: Eye movements and the development of object perception. Infant Behavior & Development 2000, 23:461-483.
25. Johnson S.P., Slemmer J.A., Amso D. Where infants look determines how they see: Eye movements and object perception performance in 3-month-olds. Infancy 2004, 6(2):185-201.
26. Just M.A., Carpenter P.A. Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cognitive Psychology 1976, 8:441-480.
27. Knoblich G., Ohlsson S., Raney G.E. An eye movement study of insight problem solving. Memory & Cognition 2001, 29(7):1000-1009.
28. Larson G.E., Alderton D.L. Test-retest results for the ECAT battery. Military Psychology 1997, 9:39-47.
29. Likert R., Quasha W.H. Manual for the Revised Minnesota Paper Form Board Test 1970, The Psychological Corporation, New York.
30. Lohman, D.F. (1979). Spatial ability: A review and reanalysis of the correlational literatures (Tech. Rep. No. 8). Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Aptitude Research Project, School of Education. (NTIS No. AD-A075 973).
31. Lohman, D.F. (1993). Spatial ability and G. Paper presented at the first Spearman Seminar, University of Plymouth.
32. Lohman D.F. Complex information processing and intelligence. Handbook of intelligence 2000, 285-340. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, US. R.J. Sternberg (Ed.).
33. McGee M. Human spatial abilities: Sources of sex differences 1979, Praeger, New York.
34. McKeever W.F., Deyo R.A. Testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, and spatial task performances of males. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1990, 28:305-308.
35. McKeever W.F., Rich D.A., Deyo R.A., Conner R.L. Androgens and spatial ability: Failure to find a relationship between testosterone and ability measures. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1987, 25:438-440.
36. Mellet E., Tzourio N., Crivello F., Joliot M., Denis M., Mazoyer B. Functional anatomy of spatial mental imagery generated from verbal instructions. The Journal of Neuroscience 1996, 16(20):6504-6512.
37. Messick S. Standards of validity and the validity of standards in performance assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 1995, 14:5-8.
38. Mislevy R.J., Bock R.D. BILOG 3: Item analysis and test scoring with binary logistic models 1990, Scientific Software, Inc, Mooresville, IN. 2nd ed.
39. Mueller C.M., Dweck C.S. Praise for intelligence can undermine children's motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998, 75(1):33-52.
40. Mumaw R.J., Pellegrino J.W., Kail R.V., Carter P. Different slopes for different folks: Process analysis of spatial aptitude. Memory & Cognition 1984, 12(5):515-521.
41. Noton D., Stark L. Eye movements and visual perception. Scientific American 1971, 224:34-43.
42. Palmer S.E. Vision science: Photons to phenomenology 1999, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
43. Patla A.E., Vickers J.N. Where and when do we look as we approach and step over an obstacle in the travel path?. Neuroreport 1997, 8(17):3661-3665.
44. Pazzaglia F., De Beni R. Strategies of processing spatial information in survey and landmark-centered individuals. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2001, 13(4):493-508.
45. Pellegrino J.W., Mumaw R.J., Shute V.J. Analyses of spatial aptitude and expertise. Test design: Developments in psychology and psychometrics 1985, Academic Press, New York. S. Embreston (Ed.).
46. Piolino P., Giffard-Quillon G., Desgranges B., Chetelat G., Baron J.-C., Eustache F. Re-experiencing old memories via hippocampus: A PET study of autobiographical memory. NeuroImage 2004, 22:1371-1383.
47. Rao S.N. The scores of MPFB test in relation to performance in engineering courses at different levels. Journal of Psychological Research 1977, 21(1):92-96.
48. Rich D.A., McKeever W.F. An investigation of immune system disorder as a "marker" for anomalous dominance. Brain and Cognition 1990, 12:55-72.
49. Salvucci, D.D., & Goldberg, J.H. (2000). Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols. Paper presented at the Eye Tracking Research & Applications Symposium 2000, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida.
50. Shah P., Miyake A. The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: An individual differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1996, 125(1):4-27.
51. Shute V.J., Pellegrino J.W., Hubert L., Reynolds R.W. The relationship between androgen levels and human spatial abilities. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1983, 21:465-468.
52. Thurstone L.L. Multiple factor analysis. Psychological Review 1931, 38:406-427.
53. West T.G. In the mind's eye 1991, Prometheus Books, Buffalo, NY.
54. Wise S.L. An investigation of the differential effort received by items on a low-stakes computer-based test. Applied Measurement in Education 2006, 19(2):95-114.
55. Wise S.L., Kong X. Response time effort: A new measure of examinee motivation in computer-based tests. Applied Psychological Measurement 2005, 18(2):163-183.
56. Wolfe J.H. Stepwise selection of ECATS for maximum validity. Military Psychology 1997, 9:85-95.
57. Yarbus A.L. Eye movements and vision 1967, Plenum, New York.