Stepwise selection of ECATs for maximum mean validity

Military Psychology

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 85-95

  Wolfe, John H ^a,b  

^a Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Pacific   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009402333     PISSN: 08995605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327876mp0901_5     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Abrahams, N. M., Alf, E. F., Kieckhaefer, W. F., Pass, J. J., Cole, D. R., & Walton-Paxton, E. (1994). Classification utility of test composites from the ASVAB, CAT-ASVAB, and ECAT batteries. (Contract No. N66001-90-D-9502, DO 7J16). San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
2. Abrahams, N. M., Pass, J. J., Kusulas, J. W., Cole, D. R., & Kieckhaefer, W. F. (1993). Incremental validity of experimental computerized tests for predicting training criteria in military technical schools (Contract No. N66001-90-D-9502, DO 7J13). San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
3. Alderton, D. L., Wolfe, J. H., & Larson, G. E. (1997/this issue). The ECAT battery. Military Psychology, 9, 5-37.
4. Held, J. D., & Wolfe, J. H. (1997/this issue). Validities of unit-weighted composites of the ASVAB and the ECAT battery. Military Psychology, 9, 77-84.
5. Horst, P. (1954). A technique for the development of a differential prediction battery. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 68, 1-31.
6. Horst, P. (1955). A technique for the development of a multiple absolute prediction battery. Psycho-logical Monographs: General and Applied, 69, 1-21.
7. Peterson, N. G., Oppler, S. H., Sager, C. E., & Rosse, R. L. (in press). Analysis of the Enhanced Computer-Administered Test battery: An evaluation of potential revisions and additions to the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
8. Sager, C. E., Peterson, N. G., Oppler, S. H., Rosse, R. L., & Walker, C. B. (1997/this issue). An examination of five indexes of test battery performance: Analysis of the ECAT battery. Military Psychology, 9, 97-120.
9. Scholarios, D. M., Johnson, C. D., & Zeidner, J. (1994). Selecting predictors for maximizing the classification efficiency of a battery. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 412-424.
10. Wolfe, J. H. (1997/this issue). Incremental validity of ECAT battery factors. Military Psychology, 9, 49-76.
11. Wolfe, J. H., Alderton, D. L., Larson, G. E., & Held, J. D. (1995). Incremental validity of Enhanced Computer-Administered Testing (ECAT) (Rep. No. TN 95-6). San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center. (NTIS No. AD-A307708)