Trade-offs among dynamic parameters inferred from results of dynamic source inversion

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Volumn 100, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 910-922

  Goto, Hiroyuki ^a   Sawada, Sumio ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC PARAMETERS; ESTIMATION PARAMETERS; FRICTION LAWS; GOVERNING PARAMETERS; GROUND MOTIONS; HISTORICAL EARTHQUAKES; LOG-LOG PLOTS; RATE PROFILES; RUPTURE TIME; SENSITIVITY TESTS; SLIP DISTRIBUTION; SLIP RATES; SOURCE INVERSION; SYNTHETIC TESTS; WAVE FORMS;

COMMERCE; FRICTION; OPTICAL TESTING;

PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INVERSION; EARTHQUAKE RUPTURE; ESTIMATION METHOD; GROUND MOTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; PALEOSEISMICITY; SEISMIC DATA; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SLIP RATE; SOURCE PARAMETERS; TRADE-OFF;

EID: 77952649590     PISSN: 00371106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1785/0120080250     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Aagaard, B. T., G. Anderson, and K. W. Hudnut (2004). Dynamic rupture modeling of the transition from thrust to strike-slip motion in the 2002 Denali fault earthquake, Alaska, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 94, S190-S201.
2. Aochi, H., and E. Fukuyama (2002). Three-dimensional nonplanar simulation of the 1992 Landers earthquake, J. Geophys. Res. 107, 2035.
3. Bouchon, M. (1997). The state of stress on some faults of the San Andreas system as inferred from near-field strong motion data, J. Geophys. Res. 102,11731-11744.
4. Cochard, A., and R. Madariaga (1994). Dynamic rupture faulting under rate-dependent friction, Pure. Appl. Geophys. 142, 419-445.
5. Corish, S., C. Bradley, and K. Olsen (2007). Assessment of a nonlinear dynamic rupture inversion technique applied to a synthetic earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 97, 901-914.
6. Dalguer, L. A., K. Irikura, and J. Riera (2003). Generation of new cracks accompanied by the dynamic shear rupture propagation of the 2000 Tottori (Japan) earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93, 2236-2252.
7. Dalguer, L. A., K. Irikura, W. Zhang, and J. D. Riera (2002). Distribution of dynamic and static stress changes during 2000 Tottori (Japan) earthquake: Brief interpretation of the earthquake sequences; foreshocks, mainshock and aftershocks, Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, 1758.
8. Day, S. M., L. A. Dalguer, N. Lapusta, and Y. Liu (2005). Comparison of finite difference and boundary integral solutions to three-dimensional spontaneous rupture, J. Geophys. Res. 110, B12307.
9. Fukuyama, E., and T. Mikumo (2006). Dynamic rupture propagation during the 1891 Nobi, central Japan, earthquake: A possible extension to the branched faults, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 96, 1257-1266.
10. Goto, H., and S. Sawada (2006a). Dynamic source inversion based on stable formulation and on identification of the resolution level via a multi-scale approach, Geophys. J. Int. 167, 779-793.
11. Goto, H., and S. Sawada (2006b). Dynamic source inversion based on stable formulation, Proc. of the 1st Eur. Conf. Earthq. Eng. Seismol., no. 1539, 1-10.
12. Goto, H., L. Ramirez-Guzman, and J. Bielak (2008). Numerical simulation of dynamic fault rupture propagation based on a combination of BIEM and FEM solutions, Proc. of the 14th World Conf. Earthq. Eng., 12-17 October 2008, Beijuing, China.
13. Guatteri, M., and P. Spudich (2000). What can strong-motion data tell us about slip-weakening fault-friction laws?, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 90,98-116.
14. Harris, R. A., J. F. Dolan, R. Hartleb, and S. M. Day (2002). The 1999 Izmit, Turkey, earthquake: A 3D dynamic stress transfer model of intra earthquake triggering, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92, 245-255.
15. Ida, Y. (1972). Cohesive force across the tip of a longitudinal-shear crack and Griffith's specific surface energy, J. Geophys. Res. 77, 3796-3805.
16. Ide, S., and M. Takeo (1997). Determination of constitutive relations of fault slip based on seismic wave analysis, J. Geophys. Res. 102, 27379-27391.
17. Mikumo, T., K. B. Olsen, E. Fukuyama, and Y. Yagi (2003). Stress-breakdown time and slip-weakening distance inferred from slip-velocity functions on earthquake faults, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93, 264-282.
18. Miyatake, T. (1992a). Reconstruction of dynamic rupture process of an earthquake with constraints of kinematic parameters, Geophys. Res. Lett. 19, 349-352.
19. Miyatake, T. (1992b). Dynamic rupture process of inland earthquakes in Japan weak and strong asperities, Geophys. Res. Lett. 19, 1041-1044.
20. Miyatake, T., Y. Yagi, and T. Yasuda (2004). The dynamic rupture process of the 2001 Geiyo, Japan, earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L12612.
21. Ohnaka, M. (2003). A constitutive scaling law and a unified comprehension for frictional slip failure, shear fracture of intact rock, and earthquake rupture, J. Geophys. Res. 108, 2080.
22. Peyrat, S., and K. Olsen (2004). Nonlinear dynamic rupture inversion of 2000 western Tottori Japan, earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L05604.
23. Peyrat, S., K. Olsen, and R. Madariaga (2004). Which dynamic rupture parameters can be estimated from strong ground motion and geodetic data?, Pure Appl. Geophys. 161, 2155-2169.
24. Pulido, N., and K. Irikura (2000). Estimation of dynamic rupture parameters from the radiated seismic energy and apparent stress, Geophys. Res. Lett. 27, 3945-3948.
25. Quin, H. (1990). Dynamic stress drop and rupture dynamics of the October 15,1979 Imperial Valley, California earthquake, Tectonophysics 175, 93-117.
26. Song, S. G., and G. C. Beroza (2004). A simple dynamic model for the 1995 Kobe, Japan earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L18613.
27. Walsh, J. L. (1923). A closed set of normal orthogonal functions, American J. Mathematics 45, 5-24.
28. Wessel, P., and W. H. F. Smith (1998). New, improved version of generic mapping tools released, Eos Trans. AGU 79, 579.
29. Zhang, W., T. Iwata, K. Irikura, A. Pitarka, and H. Sekiguchi (2004). Dynamic rupture process of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L10695.