Dynamic source inversion based on stable formulation and on identification of the resolution level via a multiscale approach

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 167, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 779-793

  Goto, Hiroyuki ^a   Sawada, Sumio ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Dynamics; Fault model; Inverse problem; Rupture propagation; Sensitivity; Stress distribution

Indexed keywords

FAULT PLANE; INVERSE ANALYSIS; INVERSION TECTONICS; PLANE STRAIN; RUPTURE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STRESS ANALYSIS;

EID: 33750724133     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: 1365246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03111.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Aki, K. & Richards P.G., 2002. Quantitative Seismology, 2nd edn, University Science Books, Sausalito, CA.
2. Andrews, D.J., 1976. Rupture velocity of plane-strain shear cracks, J. geophys. Res., 81, 5679-5687.
3. Donoho, D.L. & Johnstone, J.M., 1994. Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage, Biometrika, 81, 425-455.
4. Fukuyama, E. & Madariaga, R., 1998. Rupture dynamics of a planar fault in a 3D elastic medium: Rate- and slip-weakening friction, Bull seism. Soc. Am., 88, 1-17.
5. Graves, R.W. & Wald D.J., 2001. Resolution analysis of finite fault source inversion using one- and three-dimensional Green's functions, 1, Strong motions, J. geophys. Res., 106, 8745-8766.
6. Hartzell, S.H. & Heaton, T.H., 1983. Inversion of strong ground motion and teleseismic waveform data for the fault rupture history of the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake, Bull seism. Soc. Am., 73, 1553-1583.
7. Ida, Y., 1972. Cohesive force across the tip of a longitudinal-shear crack and Griffith's specific surface energy, J. geophys. Res., 77, 3796-3805.
8. Madariaga, R., Olsen, K.B. & Archuleta, R., 1998. Modeling dynamic rupture in a 3D earthquake fault model, Bull seism. Soc. Am., 88, 1182-1197.
9. Matsu'ura, M., Kataoka, H. & Shibazaki, B., 1992. Slip-dependent friction law and nucleation processes in earthquake rupture, Tectonophysics 211, 135-148.
10. Nakatani, M., 2001. Conceptual and physical clarification of rate and state friction: Frictional sliding as a thermally activated rheology, J. geophys. Res., 106, 13347-13380.
11. Peyrat, S. & Olsen, K.B., 2004. Nonlinear dynamic rupture inversion of the 2000 Western Tottori Japan, Earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L05604.
12. Piatanesi, A., Cocco, T.M. & Fukuyama, E., 2003. Mechanical interpretation of kinematic source models inferred from ground motion modeling: An application to the 2000 Western Tottori (Japan) Earthquake, Geophys. Res. Abstracts, 5, 10994.
13. Sekiguchi, H. & Iwata, T., 2002. Rupture process of the 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey, earthquake estimated from strong-motion waveforms, Bull seism. Soc. Am., 92, 300-311.
14. Wald, D.J. & Heaton, T.H., 1994. Spatial and temporal distribution of slip of the 1992 Landers, California earthquake, Bull seism. Soc. Am., 84, 668-691.
15. Wald, D.J., Heaton, T.H. & Helmberger D.V., 1991. Rupture model of the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake from the inversion of strong ground motion and broad-band teleseismic data, Bull seism. Soc. Am., 81, 1540-1572.
16. Yoshida, S., Koketsu, K., Shibazaki, B., Sagiya, T., Kato, T. & Yoshida Y., 1996. Joint inversion of the near- and far-field waveforms and geodetic data for the rupture process of the 1995 Kobe earthquake, J. Phys. Earth, 44, 437-454.