Combining messy phenological time series

Phenological Research: Methods for Environmental and Climate Change Analysis

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 147-158

  Schaber, Jörg ^a   Badeck, Franz ^b   Doktor, Daniel ^c   Von Bloh, Werner ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR MOLECULAR GENETICS   (Germany)

^b POTSDAM INSTITUTE FOR CLIMATE IMPACT RESEARCH   (Germany)

^c IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Gaussian mixtures; Linear models; Outliers; Robust estimation; Station effects

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952637252     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-3335-2_7     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Akaike H (1974) A new look at statistical model identification. IEEE T Automat Contr AC 19:716-723.
2. Aono Y, Kazui K (2007) Phenological data series of cherry tree flowering in Kyoto, Japan, and its application to reconstruction of springtime temperatures since the 9th century. Int J Climatol 28:905-914, DOI: 10.1002/joc.1594.
3. Chmielewski F-M, Rötzer T (2001) Response of tree phenology to climate change across Europe. Agricult Forest Meterol 108:101-112.
4. Doktor D, Badeck F-W, Hattermann F et al. (2005) Analysis and modelling of spatially and temporally varying phenological phases. In: Renard P, Demougeot-Renard H, Froidevaux R (eds) Geostatistics for environmental applications. Proceedings of the fifth European conference on geostatistics for environmental applications, Springer, Berlin, pp 137-148.
5. Dose V, Menzel A (2004) Bayesian analysis of climate change impacts in phenology. Global Change Biol 10:259-272.
6. Estrella N, Menzel A (2006) Responses of leaf colouring in four deciduous tree species to climate and weather in Germany. Climate Res 32:253-267.
7. Gilardi N, Bengio S, Kanevski M (2002) Conditional gaussian mixture models for environmental risk mapping. IEEE International Workshop on Neural Networks for Signal Processing (NNSP), pp 777-786.
8. Häkkinen R, Linkosalo T, Hari P (1995) Methods for combining phenological time series: Application to budburst in birch (B. pendula) in Central Finland for the period 1896-1955. Tree Physiol 15:721-726.
9. Koenker R (2006) quantreg: Quantile Regression. R package version 4.01, http://www.r-project.org.
10. Koenker R, Ng P, SparseM: Sparse Linear Algebra. R package version 0.71. http://www.econ.uiuc.edu/∼roger/research/sparse/sparse.html.
11. Lieth H (ed) (1974) Phenology and seasonality modelling. Springer, Berlin.
12. Linkosalo T (1999) Regularities and patterns in the spring phenology of some boreal trees. Silva Fenn 33:237-245.
13. Linkosalo T (2000) Analyses of the spring phenology of boreal trees and its response to climate change. Dissertation, University of Helsinki.
14. Linkosalo T, Häkkinen R, Hari P (1996) Improving the reliability of a combined phenological time series by analyzing observation quality. Tree Physiol 16:661-664.
15. Linkosalo T, Carter TR, Häkkinen R, Hari P (2000) Predicting spring phenology and frost damage risk of Betula spp. under climatic warming: A comparison of two models. Tree Physiol 20:1175- 1182.
16. Menzel A, Estrella N, Heitland W et al. (2008) Bayesian analysis of the species-specific lengthening of the growing season in two European countries and the influence of an insect pest. Int J Biometeorol 52:209-218, DOI 10.1007/s00484-007-0113-8.
17. Menzel A, Sparks TH, Estrella N et al. (2006) Altered geographic and temporal variability in phenology in response to climate change. Global Ecol Biogeogr 15:498-504.
18. Milliken GA, Johnson DE (1992) Analysis of messy data. Volume I: Designed experiments. Chapman and Hall, New York.
19. Parmesan C (2006) Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 37:637-669.
20. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-Plus. Statistics and computing. Springer, New York.
21. Poland WB, Shachter RD (1994) Three approaches to probability model selection. In: Lopez de Mantaras R, Poole D (eds) Uncertainty in artificial intelligence: Proceedings of the tenth conference, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, pp 478-483.
22. R Development Core Team (2007) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://www.Rproject.Org.
23. Reaumur RA (1735) Observations du thermomètre faites à Paris pendant l'année 5 comparées avec celles qui ont été faites sous la ligne, à l'Isle de France, à Alger et en quelques-unes de nos Îles de l'Amérique. Mémoires de l'academie royale des sciences Paris, 737-754.
24. Rencher AC (2000) Linear models in statistics. John Wiley, New York.
25. Rosenzweig C, Casassa G, Imeson A et al. (2007) Assessment of observed changes and responses in natural and managed systems. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP et al. (eds) Climate change 2007. Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental panel on climate change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 79-131.
26. Schaber J (2002) Phenology in Germany in the 20th century: methods, analyses and models (PIK-Report No. 78). PIK, Potsdam, downloadable at: http://www.pikpotsdam.de/research/publications/pikreports.
27. Schaber J (2007) Pheno: Auxiliary functions for phenological data analysis. R package version 1.3. http://www.r-project.org.
28. Schaber J, Badeck FW (2002) Evaluation of methods for the combination of phenological time series and outlier detection. Tree Physiol 22:973-982.
29. Schaber J, Badeck FW (2005) Plant phenology in Germany over the 20th century. Reg Environ Change 5:37-46.
30. Schwartz MD (ed) (2003) Phenology: An integrative environmental science. Tasks for vegetation science, vol 39. Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
31. Searle SR (1971) Linear models. John Wiley, New York.
32. Searle SR (1987) Linear models for unbalanced data. John Wiley, New York.