Tactile measures in the structure of intelligence

Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 53-59

  Decker, Scott L ^a,b  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive abilities; Intelligence; Tactile

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COGNITION; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; INTELLIGENCE; INTELLIGENCE TEST; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; STATISTICS; TOUCH;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; COGNITION; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; INTELLIGENCE; INTELLIGENCE TESTS; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; TOUCH; TOUCH PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77952600032     PISSN: 11961961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0015845     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Ackerman, P. L., Kyllonen, P. C., & Roberts, R. D. (1999). Learning and individual differences: Process, trait, and content determination. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2. Acton, G. S., & Schroeder, D. H. (2001). Sensory discrimination as related to general intelligence. Intelligence, 29, 263-271.
3. Alfonso, V. C., Flanagan, D. P., & Radwan, S. (2005). The impact of the Cattell-Horn-Carroll Theory on test development and interpretation of cognitive and academic abilities. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
4. Bakes, P. B., & Lindenberger, U. (1997). Emergence of a powerful connection between sensory and cognitive functions across the adult lifespan: A new window to the study of cognitive aging? Psychology and Aging, 12, 12-21.
5. Benton, A. L., & Sivan, A. B. (1993). Disturbances of the body schema. In K. M. Heilman & E. Valenstein (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology (pp. 123-140). New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Bickley, P. G., Keith, T. Z., & Wolfle, L. M. (1995). The three-stratum theory of cognitive abilities: Test of the structure of intelligence across the life span. Intelligence, 20, 309-328.
7. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
8. Carroll, J. B. (1997). The three-stratum theory of cognitive abilities. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests and issues (pp. 122-130). New York: The Guilford Press.
9. Curtis, B. A. (1990). Neurosciences: The basics. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.
10. Dean, R. S., & Woodcock, R. W. (2003). Examiner's Manual. Dean-Woodcock Neuropsychological Battery. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
11. Dean, R. S., Woodcock, R. W., Decker, S. L., & Schrank, F. A. (2003). A cognitive neuropsychological assessment system. In F. L. Schrank & D. P. Flanagan (Eds.), WJ III Clinical use and interpretation. San Diego: Elsevier Science.
12. Deary, I. J. (1994). Sensory discrimination and intelligence: Postmortem or resurrection? American Journal of Psychology, 107, 95-115.
13. Decker, S. L. (2004). Incremental validity of tactile measures in predicting letter-word identification skills. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 907-908.
14. Demetriou, A. (2002). Tracing psychology's invisible giant and its visible guards. In R. J. Sternberg & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), The general factor of intelligence: How general is it? Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Denburg, N. L., & Tranel, D. (2003). Acalculia and disturbances of the body schema. In K. M. Heilman & E. Valenstein (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology. (4th ed., pp. 161-184). New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Flanagan, D. P., & Harrison, P. L. (2005). Contemporary intellectual assessment. New York: Guilford Press.
17. Fletcher, J. M., Taylor, H. G., Morris, R., & Satz, P. (1982). Finger recognition skills and reading achievement: A developmental neuropsychological perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 124-132.
18. Fowler, P. C., Zillmer, E., & Newman, A. C. (1988). A multifactor model of the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery and its relationship to cognitive status and psychiatric diagnosis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 898-906.
19. Gallon, F. (1883). Inquiries into human faculty. London: Dent.
20. Gerstmann, J. (1940). Syndrome of finger agnosia, disorientation for right and left, agraphia and acalculia. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 44, 398-408.
21. Ghisletta, P., & Lindenberger, U. (2005). Exploring structural dynamics within and between sensory and intellectual functioning in old and very old age: Longitudinal evidence from the Berlin Aging Study. Intelligence, 33, 555-587.
22. Golden, C. J., Hammeke, T. A., & Purisch, A. D. (1981). The Luria-Nebraska neuropsychological battery. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
23. Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Halstead, W. C. (1947). Brain and intelligence: A quantitative study of the frontal lobes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor. Westport, CT: Praeger.
26. Kolb, B., & Whishaw, I. Q. (2003). Fundamentals of human neuropsychology (5th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers.
27. Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., & Loring, D. W. (2004). Neuropsychological Assessment (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Li, S. G, Jordanova, M., & Lindenberger, U. (1998). From good senses to good sense: A link between tactile information processing and intelligence. Intelligence, 26, 99-122.
29. Lindenberger, U., & Baltes, P. B. (1994). Sensory functioning and intelligence in old age: A strong connection. Psychology and Aging, 9, 339-355.
30. Lindenberger, U., Scherer, H., & Baltes, P. B. (2001). The strong connection between sensory and cognitive performance in old age: Not due to sensory acuity reductions operating during cognitive assessment. Psychology and Aging, 16, 196-205.
31. Livingston, R. B., Gray, R. M., Haak, R. A., & Jennings, E. (2000). Factor structure of the Reitan-Indiana Neuropsychological Battery for Children. Assessment, 7, 189-199.
32. MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84-89.
33. McGrew, K. S., & Flanagan, D. P. (1998). Intelligence Test Desk Reference (ITDR). The Gf-Gc Cross-Battery Assessment. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
34. Miller, C. J., & Hynd, G. W. (2004). What ever happened to developmental Gerstmann's Syndrome? Linkt to other pediatric, genetic, and neurode-velopmental syndromes. Journal of Child Neurology, 19, 282-289.
35. Nelson, K. (1996). Language in cognitive development: Emergence of the mediated mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36. Nettelbeck, T., & Young, R. (1990). Inspection time and intelligence in 7-yr-old children. A follow-up. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 1283-1289.
37. Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: Norton Library.
38. Raz, N., Willerman, L., & Yama, M. (1987). On sense and senses: Intelligence and auditory information processing. Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 201-210.
39. Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D. (2003). The significance of sensory-motor functions as indicators of brain dysfunction in children. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18, 11-18.
40. Roberts, R. D., Pallier, G., & Goff, G. N. (1999). Sensory processes within the structure of human cognitive abilities. In Learning and individual differences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
41. Roberts, R. D., Stankov, L., Pallier, G., & Dolph, B. (1997). Charting the cognitive sphere: Tactile-kinesthetic performance within the structure of intelligence. Intelligence, 25, 111-148.
42. Romo, R., & Salinas, E. (2001). Touch and go: Decision-making mechanisms in somatosensation. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 107-137.
43. Rourke, B. P. (1989). Nonverbal learning disabilities: The syndrome and the model. New York: Guilford Press.
44. Satz, P., Taylor, H. G., Friel, J., & Fletcher, J. M. (1978). Some developmental and predictive precursors of reading disabilities: A six-year follow-up. In A. L. Benton & D. Pearl (Eds.), Dyslexia (pp. 313-347). New York: Oxford University Press.
45. Spence, C, & Gallace, A. (2007). Recent developments in the study of tactile attention. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 196-207.
46. SPSS. (2005). SPSS for Windows. Chicago: SPSS.
47. Stankov, L. (2000). Structural extensions of a hierarchical view on human cognitive abilities. Learning and Individual Differences, 12, pp. 35.
48. Stankov, L., Seizova-Cajic, T., & Roberts, R. D. (2001). Tactile and kinesthetic perceptual processes within the taxonomy of human cognitive abilities. Intelligence, 29, 1-29.
49. Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Velicer, W. F., & Jackson, D. N. (1990). Component analysis versus common factor analysis: Some issues in selecting the appropriate procedure. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 1-28.
51. Widaman, K. F. (1993). Common factor analysis versus principle component analysis: Differentia] bias in representing model parameters? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 263-311.
52. Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III. Itasca: Riverside Publishing.
53. Woodward, H. R., Ridenour, T. A., Dean, R. S., & Woodcock, R. (2003). Generalizability of sensory and motor tests. International Journal of Neuroscience, 112, 1115-1137.
54. Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (1979). Best test design. Chicago: MESA Press.