Evaluating the Pedagogical Value of Multimedia Learning Material: An Experimental Study in Primary School

Curriculum, Plans, and Processes in Instructional Design: International Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 331-352

  Olkinuora, Erkki ^a   Nurmi, Sami ^b  

^a Mirjamaija Mikkilä Erdmann   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952570307     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410610560-24     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Åkerlind, G., and Trevitt, A. (1999). Enhancing self-directed learning through educational technology:When students resist the change. Innovations in Education and Training International, 36(2), 96-105.
2. Ayersman, D. (1996). Reviewing the research on hypermedia-based learning. Journal of Research in Computing in Education, 28(4), 500-526.
3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
4. Bereiter, C., and Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago: Open Court.
5. Boekaerts, M. (1995). Self-regulated learning: Bridging the gap between metacognitive and metamotivation theories. Educational Psychologist, 30(4), 195-200.
6. Brosnan, M. (1998). Technophobia: The psychological impact of information technology. London:Routledge.
7. Chen, Q., and Zhang, J. (2000). Using ICT to support constructive learning. In D. Watson and T. Downes (Eds.), Communications and networking in education: Learning in a networked society (pp. 231-241). London: Kluwer.
8. Dillon, A., and Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control and style. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 322-349.
9. Federation of Epilepsy. (1997). Aivohakkeri [Brain hacker] [CD-ROM]. Helsinki, Finland: Author.
10. Harper, B., Hedberg, J., Corderoy, B., and Wright, R. (2000). Employing cognitive tools within interactive multimedia applications. In S. Lajoie (Ed.), Computers as cognitive tools: Vol. 2. No more walls (pp. 227-246). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Jacobson, M. J., and Archodidou, A. (2000). The design of hypermedia tools for learning: Fostering conceptual change and transfer of complex scientific knowledge. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(2), 149-199.
12. Järvelä, S., Lehtinen, E., and Salonen, P. (2000). Socio-emotional orientations as a mediating variable in teaching learning interaction: Implications for instructional design. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 44(3), 293-306.
13. Jonassen, D., Campbell, J., and Davidson, M. (1994). Learning with media: Restructuring the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 31-39.
14. Jonassen, D., Peck, K., and Wilson, B. (1999). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15. Jonassen, D., and Reeves, T. (1996). Learning with technology: Using computers as cognitive tools. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 693-719). New York: Macmillan.
16. Kozma, R. (1994). A reply: Media and methods. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(3), 11-14.
17. Kozma, R., Russell, J., Jones, J., Marx, N., and Davis, J. (1996). The use of multiple, linked representations to facilitate science understanding. In S. Vosniadou, E. De Corte, R. Glaser, and H. Mandl (Eds.), International perspectives on the design of technology-supported learning environments (pp. 41-60). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Kumpulainen, K., and Mutanen, M. (1999). The situated dynamics of peer group interaction:An introduction to an analytic framework. Learning and Instruction, 9, 449-473.
19. Lawless, K., and Brown, S. (1997). Multimedia learning environments: Issues of learner control and navigation. Instructional Science, 25, 117-131.
20. Lehtinen, E. (2000). Information and communication technology in education: Desires, promises, and obstacles. In D. Watson and T. Downes (Eds.), Communications and networking in education: Learning in a networked society (pp. 311-328). London: Kluwer.
21. Lehtinen, E., Vauras, M., Salonen, P., Olkinuora, E., and Kinnunen, R. (1995). Long-term development of learning activity: Motivational, cognitive and social interaction. Educational Psychologist, 30(1), 21-35.
22. Liao, Y. (1998). Effects of hypermedia versus traditional instruction on students’ achievements:A meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30(4), 341-360.
23. Mayer, R. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1-19.
24. Mikkilä, M., and Olkinuora, E. (1994). Problems of current textbooks and workbooks: Do they promote high-quality learning? In M. De Jong and B. Van Hout-Wolters (Eds.), Processoriented instruction and learning from text (pp. 151-164). Amsterdam: VU University Press.
25. Nurmi, S., and Jaakkola, T. (2002). Teknologiset oppimisympäristöt ja oppiminen [Technologysupported learning environments and learning]. In E. Lehtinen and T. Hiltunen (Eds.), Opettajuus ja oppiminen (pp. 114-129). Turku, Finland: Painosalama.
26. Olkinuora, E., Mikkilä-Erdmann, M., Nurmi, S., and Ottosson, M. (2001). Multimediaoppimateriaalin tutkimuspohjaista arviointia ja suunnittelun suuntaviivoja [Research-based assessment of multimedia learning material and main lines of planning] (Finnish Educational Research Association, Research in Educational Sciences 3). Turku, Finland: Painosalama.
27. Olkinuora, E., and Salonen, P. (1992). Adaptation, motivational orientation, and cognition in a subnormally performing child: A systemic perspective for training. In B. Y. L. Wong (Ed.), Contemporary intervention research in learning disabilities: An international perspective (pp. 190-213). New York: Springer.
28. Reeves, T. (1998). The impact of media and technology in schools. A research report prepared for The Bertelsmann Foundation [On-line]. Available: http://www.athensacademy.org/instruct/media tech/reeves0.html
29. Rouet, J., and Levonen, J. (1996). Studying and learning with hypertext: Empirical studies and their implications. In J. Rouet, J. Levonen, A. Dillon, and R. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 9-24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Salonen, P., Lehtinen, E., and Olkinuora, E. (1998). Expectations and beyond: The development of motivation and learning in a classroom context. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Ad- vances in research on teaching: Vol. 7. Expectations in the classroom (pp. 111-150). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
31. Tergan, S. (1997). Multiple views, contexts, and symbol systems in learning with hypertext/ hypermedia: A critical review of research. Educational Technology, 37(4), 5-18.
32. Vermunt, J. D. (1998). The regulation of constructive learning processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 149-171.
33. Vermunt, J. D., and Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 9, 257-280.
34. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.