An integrated approach to identify the influential priority of the factors governing anaerobic H2 production by mixed cultures

Water Research

Volumn 44, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 3234-3242

  Fang, Fang ^a   Zeng, Raymond J ^a   Sheng, Guo Ping ^a   Yu, Han Qing ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

Author keywords

Anaerobic; Fuzzy analytic hierarchy; Grey relational entropy; Influential priority; Operating factor; Response surface methodology

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; BIOLOGICAL WATER TREATMENT; ENTROPY; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; INTEGRATED CONTROL; PH EFFECTS; SUBSTRATES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; VOLATILE FATTY ACIDS; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

ANAEROBIC; FUZZY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY; INFLUENTIAL PRIORITY; OPERATING FACTORS; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY;

HYDROGEN PRODUCTION;

ACETIC ACID; ALCOHOL; BIOGAS; BUTYRIC ACID; HYDROGEN; PROPIONIC ACID; VOLATILE FATTY ACID;

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; ANOXIC CONDITIONS; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; GENETIC ALGORITHM; WASTEWATER; WATER TREATMENT;

ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; ENTROPY; FUZZY SYSTEM; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; GENETIC ALGORITHM; HEATING; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD; TEMPERATURE; THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY; UPFLOW REACTOR; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT;

EID: 77952554599     PISSN: 00431354     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ahmad A.L., Ismail S., Bhatia S. Optimization of coagulation-flocculation process for palm oil mill effluent using response surface methodology. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39:2828-2834.
2. Ayag Z., Ozdemir R.G. A fuzzy AHP approach to evaluating machine tool alternatives. J. Intell. Manuf. 2006, 17:179-190.
3. Box G.E.P., Draper N.R. Empirical Model-building and Response Surfaces 1987, Wiley, New York.
4. Chou J.R., Tsai H.C. On-line learning performance and computer anxiety measure for unemployed adult novices using a grey relation entropy method. Inform. Process. Manag. 2009, 45:200-215.
5. Davila-Vazquez G., Alatriste-Mondragon A., de Leon-Rodriguez A., Razo-Flores E. Fermentative hydrogen production in batch experiments using lactose, cheese whey and glucose: influence of initial substrate concentration and pH. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33:4989-4997.
6. Fang F., Ni B.J., Yu H.Q. Estimating the kinetic parameters of activated sludge storage using weighted nonlinear least-squares and accelerating genetic algorithm. Water Res. 2009, 43:2595-2604.
7. Ghasempur S., Torabi S.F., Ranaei-Siadat S.O., Jalali-Heravi M., Ghaemi N., Khajeh K. Optimization of peroxidase-catalyzed oxidative coupling process for phenol removal from wastewater using response surface methodology. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41:7073-7079.
8. Hamalainen T., Klapuri H., Saarinen J., Ojala P., Kaski K. Accelerating genetic algorithm computation in tree shaped parallel computer. J. Syst. Architect. 1996, 42:19-36.
9. Jaganathan S., Erinjeri J.J., Ker J. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process based group decision support system to select and evaluate new manufacturing technologies. Int. J. Manuf. Technol. 2007, 32:1253-1262.
10. Jin J.L., Wang W.S., Cheng J.L., Huang S.F. Entropy coupled model of fuzzy pattern recognition and FAHP for reasonable allocation of water resources to region. J. Sichuan Univ. 2007, 39:9-13. (in Chinese).
11. Kraemer J.T., Bagley D.M. Improving the yield from fermentative hydrogen production. Biotechnol. Lett. 2007, 29:685-695.
12. Lay J.J. Modeling and optimization of anaerobic digested sludge converting starch to hydrogen. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2000, 68:269-278.
13. Lay J.J., Lee Y.J., Noike T. Feasibility of biological hydrogen production from organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Water Res. 1999, 33:2579-2586.
14. Logan B.E., Oh S.E., Kim I.S., van Ginkel S. Biological hydrogen production measured in batch anaerobic respirometers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36:2530-2535.
15. Mikhailov L., Tsvetinov P. Evaluation of services using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Appl. Soft. Comput. 2004, 5:23-33.
16. Mu Y., Yu H.Q., Wang Y. A kinetic approach to anaerobic hydrogen-producing process. Water Res. 2007, 41:1152-1160.
17. Mu Y., Zheng X.J., Yu H.Q., Zhu R.F. Biological hydrogen production by anaerobic sludge at various temperatures. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2006, 31:780-785.
18. Noorul Haq A., Marimuthu P., Jeyapaul R. Multi response optimization of machining parameters of drilling Al/SiC metal matrix composite using grey relational analysis in the Taguchi method. Int. J Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2008, 37:250-255.
19. Tesfamariam S., Sadiq R. Risk-based environmental decision-making using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP). Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2006, 21:35-50.
20. van Ginkel S., Sung S.W., Lay J.J. Biohydrogen production as a function of pH and substrate concentration. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35:4726-4730.
21. Wang J.L., Wan W. Optimization of fermentative hydrogen production process by response surface methodology. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33:6976-6984.
22. Wang Y., Mu Y., Yu H.Q. Comparative performance of two upflow anaerobic biohydrogen-producing reactors seeded with different sludges. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2007, 32:1086-1094.