Retinal versus physical stimulus size as determinants of visual perception in simultanagnosia

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 48, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1677-1682

  Huberle, Elisabeth ^a   Driver, Jon ^b   Karnath, Hans Otto ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Global local; Retinal size; Simultanagnosia; Spatial attention; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BINOCULAR VISION; BRAIN ATROPHY; CASE REPORT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PERCEPTION DISORDER; SIMULTANAGNOSIA; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 77952553358     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.02.013     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Bakin J.S., Nakayama K., Gilbert C.D. Visual responses in monkey areas V1 and V2 to three-dimensional surface configurations. Journal of Neuroscience 2000, 20:8188-8198.
2. Barlow H.B., Blakemore C., Pettigrew J.D. The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination. Journal of Physiology 1967, 193:327-342.
3. Bálint R. Seelenlähmung des 'Schauens', optische Ataxie, räumliche Störung der Aufmerksamkeit. Monatschrift für Psychiatrie und Neurologie 1909, 25:51-181.
4. Binet A., Simon T. Methodes nouvelles pour le diagnostic du niveau intellectual des anormaux. L'Annee psychologique 1905, 11:191-336.
5. Bradshaw M.F., Parton A.D., Eagle R.A. The interaction of binocular disparity and motion parallax in determining perceived depth and perceived size. Perception 1998, 27:1317-1331.
6. Bruggeman H., Yonas A., Konczak J. The processing of linear perspective and binocular information for action and perception. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:20-26.
7. Clavagnier S., Fruhmann Berger M., Klockgether T., Moskau S., Karnath H.-O. Involvement of posterior parietal cortex in gestalt perception. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:2330-2336.
8. Coslett H.B., Lie E. Simultanagnosia: Effects of semantic category and repetition blindness. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:1853-1863.
9. Coslett H.B., Saffran E. Simultanagnosia. To see but not to see. Brain 1991, 114:1523-1545.
10. Cumming B.G., Parker A.J. Responses of primary visual cortical neurons to binocular disparity without depth perception. Nature 1997, 389:280-283.
11. Cumming B.G., Parker A.J. Binocular neurons in V1 of awake monkeys are selective for absolute, not relative, disparity. Journal of Neuroscience 1999, 19:5602-5618.
12. Cumming B.G., Parker A.J. Local disparity not perceived depth is signaled by binocular neurons in cortical area V1 of the Macaque. Journal of Neuroscience 2000, 20:4758-4767.
13. Dalrymple, K. A., Bischof, W. F., Cameron, D., Barton, J. J., Kingstone, A. Simulating simultanagnosia: Spatially constricted vision mimics local capture and the global processing deficit. Exp Brain Res, in press.
14. Dalrymple K.A., Kingstone A., Barton J.J. Seeing trees OR seeing forests in simultanagnosia: Attentional capture can be local or global. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:871-875.
15. Day R.H. Visual spatial illusions: A general explanation. Science 1972, 175:1335-1340.
16. Demeyere N., Rzeskiewicz A., Humphreys K.A., Humphreys G.W. Automatic statistical processing of visual properties in simultanagnosia. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:2861-2864.
17. Duncan J., Bundesen C., Olson A., Humphreys G., Ward R., Kyllingsbaek S., et al. Attentional functions in dorsal and ventral simultanagnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2003, 20:675-701.
18. Emmert E. Größenverhältnisse der Nachbilder. Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde 1881, 19:443.
19. Farah M. Visual agnosia: Disorders of object recognition and what they tell us about normal vision 1990, MIT Press, Cambridge.
20. Fitzpatrick V., Pasnak R., Tyer Z.E. The effect of familiar size at familiar distances. Perception 1982, 11:85-91.
21. Fox J., Mayhew J.E. Texture discrimination and the analysis of proximity. Perception 1979, 8:75-91.
22. Friedman H.R., Goldman-Rakic P.S. Coactivation of prefrontal cortex and inferior parietal cortex in working memory tasks revealed by 2DG functional mapping in the rhesus monkey. Journal of Neuroscience 1994, 14:2775-2788.
23. Friedman-Hill S.R., Robertson L.C., Treisman A. Parietal contributions to visual feature binding: Evidence from a patient with bilateral lesions. Science 1995, 269:853-855.
24. Gillam B. Separation relative to length determines the organization of two lines into a unit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1981, 7:884-889.
25. Granrud C.E. Size constancy in infants: 4-month-olds' responses to physical versus retinal image size. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:1398-1404.
26. Holmes G. The organization of the visual cortex in man. Proceedings of the Royal Society 1945, 132:348-361.
27. Hubel D.H., Wiesel T.N. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. Journal of Physiology 1962, 160:106-154.
28. Hubel D.H., Wiesel T.N. Stereoscopic vision in macaque monkey. Cells sensitive to binocular depth in area 18 of the macaque monkey cortex. Nature 1970, 225:41-42.
29. Huberle E., Karnath H.O. Global shape recognition is modulated by the spatial distance of local elements-Evidence from simultanagnosia. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:905-911.
30. Jackson S.R., Newport R., Shaw A. Monocular vision leads to a dissociation between grip force and grip aperture scaling during reach-to-grasp movements. Current Biology 2002, 12:237-240.
31. Janssen P., Vogels R., Liu Y., Orban G.A. At least at the level of inferior temporal cortex, the stereo correspondence problem is solved. Neuron 2003, 37:693-701.
32. Karnath H.O. Bálint-Holmes syndrome. Neuropsychologie 2006, 225-236. Springer, Heidelberg. 2nd edition. H.-O. Karnath, P. Thier (Eds.).
33. Karnath H.O., Ferber S., Rorden C., Driver J. The fate of global information in dorsal simultanagnosia. Neurocase 2000, 6:295-306.
34. Kinsbourne M., Warrington E.K. A disorder of simultaneous form perception. Brain 1962, 85:461-486.
35. Luria A.R. Disorders of " simultaneous perception" in a case of bilateral occipitoparietal brain injury. Brain 1959, 82:437-449.
36. McCrea S.M., Buxbaum L.J., Coslett H.B. Illusory conjunctions in simultanagnosia: Coarse coding of visual feature location?. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:1724-1736.
37. Murray S.O., Boyaci H., Kersten D. The representation of perceived angular size in human primary visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience 2006, 9:429-434.
38. Navon D. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology 1977, 9:353-383.
39. Nienborg H., Cumming B.G. Macaque V2 neurons, but not V1 neurons, show choice-related activity. Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26:9567-9578.
40. Pilewski J.L., Martin B.A. Effects of monocular versus binocular viewing in the Ames Distorted-Room illusion. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1991, 72:306.
41. Poggio G.F., Fischer B. Binocular interaction and depth sensitivity in striate and prestriate cortex of behaving rhesus monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology 1977, 40:1392-1405.
42. Prytulak L.S., Bordie D.A. Effect of length, density, and angel between arms of Gestalt grouping. British Journal of Psychology 1975, 66:91-99.
43. Rafal R.D. Balint syndrome. Behavioral neurology and neuropsychology 1997, 337-356. McGraw-Hill, New York. T.E. Feinberg, M.J. Farah (Eds.).
44. Rafal R.D., Robertson L. The neurology of visual attention. The cognitive neurosciences 1995, 625-648. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. M. Gazzaniga (Ed.).
45. Rizzo M., Hurtig R. Looking but not seeing: Attention, perception, and eye movements in simultanagnosia. Neurology 1987, 37:1642-1648.
46. Rizzo M., Robin D.A. Simultanagnosia: A defect of sustained attention yields insights on visual information processing. Neurology 1990, 40:447-455.
47. Roe A.W., Parker A.J., Born R.T., DeAngelis G.C. Disparity channels in early vision. Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 27:11820-11831.
48. Roid G.H. Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales 2003, Riverside Publishing, Itasca, IL. 5th edition.
49. Shalev L., Chajut E., Humpreys G.W. Interactive perceptual and attentional limits in visual extinction. Neurocase 2005, 11:452-462.
50. Subramanian A., Dickinson C. Size constancy in visual impairment: A comparison with normally sighted individuals. Opthalmic and Physiologic Optics 2004, 24:350-354.
51. Tang-Wai D.F., Graff-Radford N.R., Boeve B.F., Dickson D.W., Parisi J.E., Crook R., et al. Clinical, genetic, and neuropathologic characteristics of posterior cortical atrophy. Neurology 2004, 63:1168-1174.
52. Thomas O.M., Cumming B.G., Parker A.J. A specialization for relative disparity in V2. Nature Neuroscience 2002, 5:472-478.
53. Trotter Y., Celebrini S., Stricanne B., Thorpe S., Imbert M. Neural processing of stereopsis as a function of viewing distance in primate visual cortical area V1. Journal of Neurophysiology 1996, 76:2872-2885.
54. Ungerleider L.G., Courtney S.M., Haxby J.V. A neural system for human visual working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1998, 95:883-890.
55. Westheimer G. Cooperative neural processes involved in stereoscopic acuity. Experimental Brain Research 1972, 36:585-597.
56. Wolpert I. Die Simultanagnosie. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie 1924, 93:397-415.