The processing of linear perspective and binocular information for action and perception

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 45, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 1420-1426

  Bruggeman, Hugo ^a   Yonas, Albert ^a   Konczak, Jürgen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Arm movement; Depth perception; Human; Monocular and binocular viewing; Motor control; Visual illusion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR; BINOCULAR VISION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION; MALE; MONOCULAR VISION; NORMAL HUMAN; RECOGNITION; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL ILLUSION; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CUES; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR;

EID: 33846217874     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Aglioti S., DeSouza J.F.X., and Goodale M.A. Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology 5 6 (1995) 679-685
2. Bruno N. When does action resist visual illusions?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 9 (2001) 379-382
3. Carey D.P. Do action systems resist visual illusions?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 3 (2001) 109-113
4. Franz V.H., Gegenfurtner K., Bülthoff H., and Fahle M.P. Grasping visual illusions: No evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychological Science 11 1 (2000) 20-25
5. Glickstein M. How are visual areas of the brain connected to motor areas for the sensory guidance of movement?. Trends in Neurosciences 23 12 (2000) 613-617
6. Goodale M.A., and Milner A.D. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences 15 1 (1992) 20-25
7. Hillis J.M., Watt S.J., Landy M.S., and Banks M.S. Slant from texture and disparity cues: Optimal cue combination. Journal of Vision 4 12 (2004) 967-992
8. Khan M.A., Franks I.M., Elliott D., Lawrence G.P., Chua R., Bernier P.-M., et al. Inferring online and offline processing of visual feedback in target-directed movements from kinematic data. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 30 8 (2006) 1106-1121
9. Knill D.C. Discrimination of planar surface slant from texture: Human and ideal observers compared. Vision Research 38 11 (1998) 1683-1711
10. Kroliczak G., Heard P., Goodale M.A., and Gregory R.L. Dissociation of perception and action unmasked by the hollow-face illusion. Brain Research 1080 1 (2006) 9-16
11. Maschke M., Gomez C.M., Tuite P.J., Pickett K., and Konczak J. Depth perception in cerebellar and basal ganglia disease. Experimental Brain Research 175 (2006) 165-176
12. Melmoth D.R., and Grant S. Advantages of binocular vision for the control of reaching and grasping. Experimental Brain Research 171 (2006) 371-388
13. Ungerleider L.G., and Mishkin M. Two cortical visual systems. In: Ingle D.J., Goodale M.A., and Mansfield R.J.W. (Eds). Analysis of visual behavior (1982), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA pp. 549-586
14. Vishton P.M., Rea J.G., Cutting J.E., and Nunez L.N. Comparing effects of the horizontal-vertical illusion on grip scaling and judgment: Relative versus absolute, not perception versus action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 6 (1999) 1659-1672
15. Winter D.A. Biomechanics of human movement (1979), Wiley, New York
16. Yonas A., Cleaves W.T., and Pettersen L. Development of sensitivity to pictorial depth. Science 200 (1978) 77-79