A comparison of two cognitive test paradigms in a penetrating brain injury model

Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Volumn 189, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 84-87

  Davis, Angela R ^a,b   Shear, Deborah A ^a   Chen, Zhiyong ^a   Lu, Xi Chun M ^a   Tortella, Frank C ^a  

^a WALTER REED ARMY INSTITUTE OF RESEARCH   (United States)

^b Geneva Foundation   (United States)

Author keywords

Morris water maze; Novel object recognition; Penetrating brain injury; Traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER; BRAIN INJURY; BRAIN TISSUE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; GUNSHOT INJURY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MAZE TEST; MENTAL TEST; NEUROPROTECTION; NONHUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PENETRATING TRAUMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY;

ANIMALS; ATTENTION; BRAIN INJURIES; COGNITION; COGNITION DISORDERS; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; MALE; MAZE LEARNING; MEMORY DISORDERS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 77952552291     PISSN: 01650270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.03.012     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Abe H., Ishida Y., Iwasaki T. Perirhinal N-methyl-d-aspartate and muscarinic systems participate in object recognition in rats. Neurosci Lett 2004, 356:191-194.
2. Bellamy R, Zatjchuk R. The textbook of military medicine, Part I: Office of the Surgeon General, Department the Army, United States America, Washington, DC; 1998.
3. Broadbent N.J., Squire L.R., Clark R.E. Spatial memory, recognition memory, and the hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004, 101:14515-14520.
4. Chen Z., Tortella F.C., Dave J.R., Marshall V.S., Clark D.L., Sing G., Du F., Lu X.C. Human amnion-derived multipotent progenitor cell treatment alleviates traumatic brain injury-induced axonal degeneration. J Neurotraum 2009, 26:1987-1997.
5. Corrigan J.D., Whiteneck G., Mellick D. Perceived needs following traumatic brain injury. J. Head Trauma Rehabil 2004, 19:205-216.
6. Ennaceur A., Cavoy A., Costa J.C., Delacour J. A new one-trial test for neurobiological studies of memory in rats. 2. Effects of Piracetam and Pramiracetam. Behav Brain Res 1989, 33:197-207.
7. Ennaceur A., Delacour J. A new one-trial test for neurobiological studies of memory in rats. 1. Behavioral-data. Behav Brain Res 1988, 31:47-59.
8. Fujimoto S.T., Longhi L., Saatman K.E., McIntosh T.K. Motor and cognitive function evaluation following experimental traumatic brain injury. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2004, 28:365-378.
9. Graybiel A.M., Aosaki T., Flaherty A.W., Kimura M. The basal ganglia and adaptive motor control. Science 1994, 265:1826-1831.
10. Hamm R.J., Dixon C.E., Gbadebo D.M., Singha A.K., Jenkins L.W., Lyeth B.G., Hayes R.L. Cognitive deficits following traumatic brain injury produced by controlled cortical impact. J Neurotraum 1992, 9:11-20.
11. Morris R.G.M. Spatial localization does not require the presence of local cues. Learn Motiv 1981, 12:239-260.
12. Shear D.A., Williams A.J., Sharrow K., Lu X.C.M., Tortella F.C. Neuroprotective profile of dextromethorphan in an experimental model of penetrating ballistic-like brain injury. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2009, 94:56-62.
13. Smith D.H., Okiyama K., Thomas M.J., Claussen B., McIntosh T.K. Evaluation of memory dysfunction following experimental brain injury using the Morris water maze. J Neurotraum 1991, 8:259-269.
14. Thurman D., Alverson C., Dunn K., Guerrero J., Sniezek J. Traumatic brain injury in the United States: a public health perspective. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1999, 14:602-615.
15. Williams A.J., Hartings J.A., Lu X.C.M., Rolli M.L., Dave J.R., Tortella F.C. Characterization of a new rat model of penetrating ballistic brain injury. J Neurotraum 2005, 22:313-331.