'Slowing Down When You Should': Initiators and influences of the transition from the routine to the effortful

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1019-1026

  Moulton, Carol anne ^a,b   Regehr, Glenn ^a   Lingard, Lorelei ^a   Merritt, Catherine ^a   MacRae, Helen ^b  

^a TORONTO GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Automaticity; Expertise; Judgment; Nontechnical skills; Slowing down

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MEDICAL ERROR; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SURGERY; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; URBAN POPULATION;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; HOSPITALS, UNIVERSITY; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MEDICAL ERRORS; PROBLEM SOLVING; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE; URBAN POPULATION;

EID: 77952551083     PISSN: 1091255X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-010-1178-y     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Schön DA. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books, 1983.
2. Schön DA. Educating the reflective practitioner: toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1987.
3. Dreyfus HL, Dreyfus SE. Mind over machine. New York: Free, 1986.
4. Moulton CA, Regehr G, Mylopoulos M, MacRae HM. Slowing down when you should: a new model of expert judgment. Acad Med 2007; 82(10 Suppl): S109-S116.
5. Glaser B, Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine, 1967.
6. Charmaz K. Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y, eds. Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2000, pp 509-535.
7. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1998.
8. Morse J. The significance of saturation. Qual Health Res 1995; 5: 147-149.
9. Kelle U. Computer-aided qualitative data analysis: theory, methods and practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2002.
10. Moulton C, Regehr G, Lingard L, Merritt C, MacRae H. Operating from the other side of the table: control dynamics and the surgeon educator. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 210: 79-86.
11. Reason J. Safety in the operating theatre-part 2: human error and organisational failure. Qual Saf Health Care 2005; 14(1): 56-60.
12. Carthey J, de Leval MR, Reason JT. Institutional resilience in healthcare systems. Qual Health Care 2001; 10(1): 29-32.
13. Reason JT, Carthey J, de Leval MR. Diagnosing "vulnerable system syndrome": an essential prerequisite to effective risk management. Qual Health Care 2001; 10(Suppl 2): ii21-ii25.
14. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 2009; 360(5): 491-499.
15. Lingard L, Regehr G, Orser B et al. Evaluation of a preoperative checklist and team briefing among surgeons, nurses, and anesthesiologists to reduce failures in communication. Arch Surg 2008; 143(1): 12-17.
16. Custers EJ, Regehr G, Norman GR. Mental representations of medical diagnostic knowledge: a review. Acad Med 1996; 71(10 Suppl): S55-S61.
17. Regehr G, Norman GR. Issues in cognitive psychology: implications for professional education. Acad Med 1996; 71(9): 988-1001.
18. Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med 2004; 10: S1-S12.
19. Kahneman D. Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1973.
20. Cowan N, Elliot EM, Saults JS et al. On the capacity of attention: Its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes. Cogn Psychol 2005; 51: 42-100.
21. Simons DJ. Attentional capture and inattentional blindness. Trends Cogn Sci 2000; 4(4): 147-155.
22. Rensink RA, Oregan JK, Clark JJ. To see or not to see: the need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychol Sci 1997; 8(5): 368-373.
23. Evans JSBT. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annu Rev Psychol 2008; 59: 255-278.
24. De NW, Glumicic T. Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking. Cognition 2008; 106(3): 1248-1299.
25. Burke K. A rhetoric of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969.
26. Lingard L, Haber RJ. Teaching and learning communication in medicine: a rhetorical approach. Acad Med 1999; 74(5): 507-510.
27. Endsley MR. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors 1995; 37: 32-64.
28. Jones DG, Endsley MR. Sources of situation awareness errors in aviation. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1996; 67(6): 507-512.
29. Franzese CB, Stringer SP. The evolution of surgical training: perspectives on educational models from the past to the future. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2007; 40(6): 1227-1235, vii.
30. Rosenthal DM. Consciousness and its function. Neuropsychologia 2008; 46(3): 829-840.
31. Koriat A. The feeling of knowing: some metatheoretical implications for consciousness and control. Conscious Cogn 2000; 9(2 Pt 1): 149-171.
32. Kentridge RW, Heywood CA. Metacognition and awareness. Conscious Cogn 2000; 9: 308-312.
33. Mandler G. The consciousness continuum: from "qualia" to "free will". Psychol Res 2005; 69(5-6): 330-337.
34. Regehr G, Eva K. Self-assessment, self-direction, and the self-regulating professional. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 449: 34-38.
35. Epstein RM, Siegel DJ, Silberman J. Self-monitoring in clinical practice: a challenge for medical educators. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2008; 28(1): 5-13.