Building topographic subspace model with transfer learning for sparse representation

Neurocomputing

Volumn 73, Issue 10-12, 2010, Pages 1662-1668

  Liu, Yang ^a   Cheng, Jian ^a   Xu, Changsheng ^a   Lu, Hanqing ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF AUTOMATION   (China)

Author keywords

Image classification; Image retrieval; Sparse representation; Topographic subspace model; Transfer learning

Indexed keywords

AUXILIARY DATA; CLASS LABELS; DESCRIPTORS; DISCRIMINATIVE FEATURES; IMAGE DATASETS; PHOTOMETRIC IMAGES; ROTATION INVARIANT; SPARSE REPRESENTATION; SUBSPACE LEARNING; SUBSPACE MODELS; TOPOGRAPHIC MODELS; TOPOGRAPHIC SUBSPACE MODEL; TRAINING DATA; TRAINING IMAGE; TRANSFER LEARNING; VISUAL CORTEXES;

IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; IMAGE CODING; IMAGE RETRIEVAL; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; SALINITY MEASUREMENT;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

ARTICLE; GEOMETRY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE RETRIEVAL; KERNEL METHOD; LEARNING ALGORITHM; PHOTOMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL CORTEX;

EID: 77952548790     PISSN: 09252312     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2009.11.041     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. J. Sivic, A. Zisserman, Video google: a text retrieval approach to object matching in videos, in: Proceedings of ICCV, 2003.
2. Bay H., Ess A., Tuytelaars T., Van Gool L. SURF: speeded up robust features. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 2008, 110(3):346-359.
3. Y.G. Jiang, C.W. Ngo, J. Yang, Towards optimal bag-of-features for object categorization and semantic video retrieval, in: International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval, 2007.
4. L. Fei-Fei, R. Fergus, P. Perona, Learning gen-erative visual models from few training examples: an incremental Bayesian approach tested on 101 object categories, CVPR Workshop on Gen.-Model Based Vision, 2004.
5. H. Jegou, M. Douze, C. Schmid, Hamming embedding and weak geometric consistency for large scale image search, in: ECCV, 2008.
6. Lyons M.J., Budynek J., Akamatsu S. Automatic classification of single facial images. IEEE Transactions on PAMI 1999, 21:1357-1362.
7. Yu H., Yang J. A direct LDA algorithm for high-dimensional data with application to face recognition. Pattern Recognition 2001, 34(10):2067-2070.
8. R. Raina, A. Battle, H. Lee, B. Packer, A.Y. Ng, Self-taught learning: transfer learning form unlabeled data, in: ICML, 2007, pp. 759-766.
9. A. Quattoni, M. Collins, T. Darrell, Transfer learning for image classification with sparse prototype representations, CVPR, 2008, pp. 1-8.
10. A. Zweig, D. Weinshall, Exploiting object hierarchy: combining models from different categor levels, in: ICCV, 2007.
11. Pang Y., Yuan Y., Li X. Generalised nearest feature line for subspace learning. Electronics Letters 2007, 43(20).
12. Yan W., Liu Q., Lu H., Ma S. Multiple similarities based kernel subspace learning for image classification. ACCV 2006, 244-253.
13. Tao D., Tang X., Li X., Wu X. Asymmetric bagging and random subspace for support vector machines-based relevance feedback in image retrieval. IEEE Transactions on PAMI 2006, 28:1088-1099.
14. Tao D., Li X., Wu X., Maybank S.J. Geometric mean for subspace selection. IEEE Transactions on PAMI 2009, 31(2):260-274.
15. Pang Y., Yuan Y., Li X. Iterative subspace analysis based on feature line distance. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 2009, 18(4):903-907.
16. Peng X., King I. A biased minimax probability machine-based scheme for relevance feedback in image retrieval. Neurocomputing 2009, 72(7-9):2046-2051.
17. D.Cai, X.He, J.Han, Spectral regression: a unified subspace learning framework for content-based image retrieval, in: ACM MM, 2007, pp. 403-412.
18. Tao D., Tang X., Li X. Which components are important for interactive image searching?. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and System for Video Technology 2008, 10(1).
19. J. Yang, K. Yu, Y. Gong, T. Huang, Linear spatial pyramid matching using sparse coding for image classification, CVPR, 2009, pp. 1794-1801.
20. K. Kavukcuoglu, M. Ranzato, R. Fergus, Y. LeCun, Learning invariant features through topographic filter maps, CVPR, 2009, pp. 1605-1612.
21. J. Philbin, O. Chum, M. Isard, J. Sivic, A. Zisserman, Lost in quantization: improving particular object retrieval in large scale image databases, CVPR, 2008, pp. 1-8.
22. S.J. Pan, Q. Yang, A survey on transfer learning, Report. http://www.cse.ust.hk/sinnopan/publications/TLsurvey_0822.pdf.
23. D. Lowe, Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints, IJCV, 2004, pp. 91-110.
24. K. Yan, S. Rahul, PCA-SIFT: a more distinctive representation for local image descriptors, CVPR, 2004, pp. 506-513.
25. H. Lee, A. Battle, R. Raina, A.Y. Ng, Efficient sparse coding algorithms, NIPS, 2006.
26. Olshausen B.A., Field D.J. Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature 1996, 381:607-609.
27. Hyvärinen, Hoyer P.O., Inki M. Topographic independent component analysis. Neural Computation 2001, 13(7):1527-1558.
28. Hyvärinen A., Hoyer P.O. A two-layer sparse coding model learns simple and complex cell receptive fields and topography from natural images. Vision Research 2001, 41(18):2413-2423.
29. K. Grauman, T. Darrell, The pyramid matching kernel: discriminative classification with sets of image features, in: ICCV, 2005.