Adaptation of experimental yeast populations to stressful conditions in relation to population size

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 791-796

  Samani, P ^a   Bell, G ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Beneficial mutation; Effective population size; Experimental evolution; Limits to selection; Response to selection; Saccharomyces paradoxus

Indexed keywords

SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ADAPTATION; EVOLUTIONARILY STABLE STRATEGY; MUTATION; NATURAL SELECTION; POPULATION SIZE; SALINITY TOLERANCE; YEAST;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; DRUG EFFECT; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SACCHAROMYCES;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; GENETIC VARIATION; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SACCHAROMYCES; SELECTION, GENETIC; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES PARADOXUS;

EID: 77952529450     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.01945.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bell G. The ecology and genetics of fitness in Chlamydomonas. V. The relationship between genetic correlation and environmental variance. Evolution 1992, 46:561-566.
2. Bell G. Selection. The Mechanism of Evolution 2008, 2nd edn, Oxford University Press, Oxford
3. Bell G, Collins S. Adaptation, extinction and global change. Evol. Appl. 2008, 1:3-16.
4. Bell G, Gonzalez A. Evolutionary rescue can prevent extinction following environmental change. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12:942-948.
5. Bull JJ, Badgett MR, Wichman HA. Big-benefit mutations in a bacteriophage inhibited with heat. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2000, 17:942-950.
6. Burch CL, Chao L. Evolution by small steps and rugged landscapes in the RNA virus φ6. Genetics 1999, 151:921-927.
7. Cuevas JM, Elena SF, Moya A. Molecular basis of adaptive convergence in experimental populations of RNA viruses. Genetics 2002, 162:533-542.
8. De Visser JAGM, Rozen DE. Limits to adaptation in asexual populations. J. Evol. Biol. 2005, 18:779-788.
9. De Visser JAGM, Zeyl CW, Gerrish PJ, Blanchard JL, Lenski RE. Diminishing returns from mutation supply rate in asexual populations. Science 1999, 283:404-406.
10. Falconer DS. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics 1981, Longman, London
11. Gerrish PJ, Lenski RE. The fate of competing beneficial mutations in an asexual population. Genetica 1998, 102/103:127-144.
12. Giaever G. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 2002, 418:387-391.
13. Gomulkiewicz R, Holt RD. When does evolution by natural selection prevent extinction? Evolution 1995, 49:201-207.
14. Lang GI, Murray AW. Estimating the per-base-pair mutation rate in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2008, 178:67-82.
15. Lenski RE, Rose MR, Simpson SC, Tadler SC. Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichi coli. 1. Adaptation and divergence during 2,000 generations. Am. Nat. 1991, 138:1315-1341.
16. Lynch M, Lande R. Evolution and extinction in response to environmental change. Biotic Interactions and Global Climate Change 1993, 234-250. Kareiva PM, Kingsolver JGHuey RB. In, eds, pp, Sinauer, Sunderland, MA
17. Lynch M, Sung W, Morris K, Crown N, Landry CR, Dopman EB, Dickinson WJ, Okamoto K, Kulkarni S, Hartl DL, Thomas WK. A genome-wide view of the spectrum of spontaneous mutations in yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105:9272-9277.
18. Miralles R, Moya A, Elena SF. Diminishing returns of population size in the rate of RNA virus adaptation. J. Virol. 2000, 74:3566-3571.
19. Perron GG, Zasloff M, Bell G. Experimental evolution of resistance to an antimicrobial peptide. Proc. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2006, 273:251-256.
20. Saffhill R, Schneider-Bernloehr H, Orgel LE, Spiegelman S. In vitro selection of bacteriophage Qβ RNA variants resistant to ethidium bromide. J. Mol. Biol. 1970, 51:531-539.
21. Sanjuan R, Moya A, Elena SF. The distribution of fitness effects caused by single-nucleotide substitutions in an RNA virus. PNAS 2004, 101:8396-8401.
22. Warringer J, Ericson E, Fernandez L, Nerman O, Blomberg A. High-resolution yeast phenomics resolves different physiological features in the saline response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100:15724-15729.
23. Weber KE. Increased selection response in larger populations. I. Selection for wing-tip height in Drosophila melanogaster at three population sizes. Genetics 1990, 125:579-584.
24. Weber KE, Diggins LT. Increased selection response in larger populations. II. Selection for ethanol vapor resistance in Drosophila melanogaster at two population sizes. Genetics 1990, 125:585-597.
25. Willi Y, van Buskirk J, Hoffmann AA. Limits to the adaptive potential of small populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2006, 17:433-458.