Detecting femur-insert collisions to improve precision of fluoroscopic knee arthroplasty analysis

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 694-700

  Prins, A H ^a   Kaptein, B L ^a   Stoel, B C ^a   Reiber, J H C ^a   Valstar, E R ^a,b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Collision detection; Fluoroscopic analysis; Pose estimation

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY AND PRECISION; CAD MODELS; COLLISION DETECTION; FEMORAL COMPONENT; FLUOROSCOPIC ANALYSIS; IN-VIVO; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; ORIENTATION PARAMETER; OUT-OF-PLANE; OUT-OF-PLANE DIRECTION; PHANTOM STUDIES; POSE ESTIMATION; RELATIVE POSE; REVERSE ENGINEERED MODELS;

ERRORS; ESTIMATION; MOTION ESTIMATION; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS;

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BODY POSITION; ERROR; FEMUR; FLUOROSCOPY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IN VIVO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JOINT MOBILITY; KINEMATICS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MOTION; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; ALGORITHM; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EQUIPMENT; EVALUATION; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; METHODOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ALGORITHMS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMUR; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE;

EID: 77952496334     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: 18732380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.10.023     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Banks S., Hodge W. Accurate measurements of three-dimensional knee replacement kinematics using single-plane fluoroscopy. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 1996, 43(6):638-649.
2. Bland J., Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical assessment. Lancet 1986, 1(8476):307-310.
3. Canny J. A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1986, 8(6):679-698.
4. Hirokawa, S., Hossain, M.A., Kihara, Y., Ariyoshi, S., 2008. A 3D kinematic estimation of knee prosthesis using X-ray projection images: clinical assessment of the improved algorithm for fluoroscopy images. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.
5. Hoff, W., & Komistek, R., Dennis, D., Walker, S., Northcut, E., Spargo, K., 1996. Pose estimation of artificial knee implants in fluoroscopy images using a template matching technique. In: Proceedings of the Third IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision, 1996. WACV'96', pp. 181-186.
6. Hoff W., Komistek R., Dennis D., Gabriel S., Walker S. Three-dimensional determination of femoral-tibial contact positions under in vivo conditions using fluoroscopy. Clinical Biochemistry (Bristol, Avon) 1998, 13(7):455-472.
7. Kanisawa I., Banks A., Banks S., Moriya H., Tsuchiya A. Weight-bearing knee kinematics in subjects with two types of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 2003, 11(1):16-22.
8. Kaptein B., Valstar E., Stoel B., Rozing P., Reiber J. A new model-based RSA method validated using CAD models and models from reversed engineering. Journal of Biomechanics 2003, 36(6):873-882.
9. Komistek, R., Dennis, D., Mahfouz, M., 2003. In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of the normal human knee: Knee kinematics and total knee replacement design. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 410, 69-81.
10. Koning O.H., Kaptein B.L., Garling E.H., Hinnen J.W., Hamming J.F., Valstar E.R., van Bockel J.H. Assessment of three dimensional stent-graft dynamics by using fluoroscopic Roentgenographic stereophotogrammetric analysis. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2007, 46(4):773-779.
11. Li G., Van de Velde S., Bingham J. Validation of a non-invasive fluoroscopic imaging technique for the measurement of dynamic knee joint motion. Journal of Biomechanics 2008, 41(7):1616-1622.
12. Mahfouz M., Hoff W., Komistek R., Dennis D. A robust method for registration of three-dimensional knee implant models to two-dimensional fluoroscopy images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2003, 22(12):1561-1574.
13. OpCode, the collision detection library from the Open Dynamics Engine, http://www.ode.org.
14. Prins A.H., Kaptein B.L., Stoel B.C., Nelissen R.G.H.H., Reiber J.H.C., Valstar E.R. Handling modular hip implants in model-based RSA: combined stem-head models. Journal of Biomechanics 2008, 41(14):2912-2917.
15. Tashman S., Anderst W. In-vivo measurement of dynamic joint motion using high speed biplane radiography and CT: application to canine ACL deficiency. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2003, 125:238.
16. You B., Siy P., Anderst W., Tashman S. In vivo measurement of 3-D skeletal kinematics from sequences ofbiplane radiographs: application to knee kinematics. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2001, 20(6):514-525.
17. Zuffi S., Leardini A., Catani F., Fantozzi S., Cappello A. A model-based method for the reconstruction of total knee replacement kinematics. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 1999, 18(10):981-991.