Convergence of direct, indirect, and objective risk-taking measures in gambling. The moderating role of impulsiveness and self-control

Journal of Psychology

Volumn 218, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 20-27

  Dislich, Friederike X R ^a   Zinkernagel, Axel ^a   Ortner, Tuulia M ^b   Schmitt, Manfred ^a  

^a University of Koblenz Landau ^*  (Germany)

^b FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Implicit association test; Objective personality tests; Predictive validity of indirect measures; Semantic misattribution procedure

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952494646     PISSN: 00443409     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/0044-3409/a000004     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, NJ: Sage.
2. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888-918.
3. Asendorpf, J. B., Banse, R., & Mücke, D. (2002). Double dissociation between implicit and explicit personality self-concept: The case of shy behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 380-393.
4. Banse, R., Imhoff, R., Schmidt, A. F., & Bernhardt, J. (submitted). An inkblot for male sexual preference: The sexual misattribution procedure.
5. Blais, A.-R., & Weber, E. U. (2001). A domain-specific risktaking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgement and Decision Making, 1, 33-47.
6. Blanton, H., Jaccard, J., Gonzales, P. M., & Christie, C. (2006). Decoding the implicit association test: Implications for criterion prediction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 192-212.
7. Brand, M., Fujiwara, E., Borsutzky, S., Kalbe, E., Kessler, J., & Markowitsch, H. J. (2005). Decision-making deficits of Korsakoff patients in a new gambling task with explicit rules: Associations with executive functions. Neuropsychology, 19, 267-277.
8. Brand, M., Heinze, K., Labudda, K., & Markowitsch, H. J. (2008). The role of strategies in deciding advantageously in ambiguous and risky situations. Cognitive Processing, 9, 159-173.
9. Carver, C. S. (2005). Impulse and constraint: Perspectives from personality psychology, convergence with theory in other areas, and potential for integration. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 312-333.
10. Cattell, R. B., & Warburton, F. W. (1967). Objective personality and motivation tests: A theoretical introduction and practical compendium. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
11. Czopp, A. M., Monteith, M. J., Zimmerman, R. S., & Lynam, D. R. (2004). Implicit attitudes as potential protection from risky sex: Predicting condom use with the IAT. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26, 227-236.
12. De Houwer, J. (2006). Using the Implicit Association Test does not rule out an impact of conscious propositional knowledge on evaluative conditioning. Learning and Motivation, 37, 176-187.
13. Egloff, B., & Schmukle, S. C. (2002). Predictive validity of an Implicit Association Test for assessing anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1441-1455.
14. Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and uses. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297-327.
15. Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229-238.
16. Friese, M., Hofmann, W., & Schmitt, M. (2008). When and why do implicit measures predict behavior? Empirical evidence for the moderating role of opportunity, motivation, and process reliance. European Review of Social Psychology, 19, 285-338.
17. Friese, M., Hofmann, W., & Wänke, M. (2008). When impulses take over: Moderated predictive validity of implicit and explicit attitude measures in predicting food choice and consumption behavior. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 397-419.
18. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
19. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test I: An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197-216.
20. Gschwendner, T., Hofmann, W., & Schmitt, M. (2008). Convergent and predictive validity of implicit and explicit anxiety measures as a function of specificity similarity and content similarity. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24, 254-262.
21. Hofmann, W., Gschwendner, T., Nosek, B., & Schmitt, M. (2005). What moderates implicit-explicit consistency? European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 335-390.
22. Hunt, M. K., Hopko, D. R., Bare, R., Lejeuz, C. W., & Robinson, E. V. (2005). Construct validity of the Balloon Analog Risk Task (BART): Associations with psychopathy and impulsivity. Assessment, 12, 416-428.
23. Johnson, J. G., Wilke, A., & Weber, E. U. (2004). A domainspecific scale measuring risk perceptions, expected benefits, and perceived-risk attitude in German-speaking populations. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 35, 153-163.
24. Karpinski, A., & Steinman, R. B. (2006). The single category implicit association test as a measure of implicit social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 16-32.
25. Kogan, N., & Wallach, M. A. (1964). Risk taking: A study in cognition and personality. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
26. Lejuez, C. W., Read, J. P., Kahler, C. W., Richards, J. B., Ramsey, S. E., & Stuart, G. L. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology, 8, 75-84.
27. Payne, B. K., Cheng, C. M., Govorun, O., & Stewart, B. D. (2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 277-293.
28. Ronay, R., & Kim, D. Y. (2006). Gender differences in explicit and implicit risk attitudes: A socially facilitated phenomenon. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 397-419.
29. Rudolph, A., Schröder-Abé, M., Schütz, A., Gregg, A. P., & Sedikides, C. (2008). Through a glass, less darkly? Reassessing convergent and discriminant validity in measures of implicit self-esteem. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24, 273-281.
30. Schmidt, A. F. (in preparation). Fragebogen zu selbststeuernden Kompetenzen (FSSTK) [Questionnaire of self-regulative competencies] University of Bonn.
31. Schmitt, M. (2009). Person · situation - interactions as moderators. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 267.
32. Smith, E. C., & DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 108-131.
33. Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271-324.
34. Thush, C., Wiers, R. W., Ames, S. L., Grenard, J. L., Sussman, S., & Stacy, A. W. (2009). Interactions between implicit and explicit cognition and working memory capacity in the prediction of alcohol use in at-risk adolescents. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 94, 116-124.
35. Zuckerman, M. (1991). Psychobiology of personality. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.