Psychologically distinct classes of motor behavior inferred from individual differences: Evidence from a sequential stacking task

Journal of Motor Behavior

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 187-194

  Rosenbaum, David A ^a   Coelho, Chase J ^a   Rhode, Jewels D ^b   Santamaria, Joseph P ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SMITH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Grasping; Individual differences; Object manipulation; Planning; Reaching

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HAND; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77952481276     PISSN: 00222895     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00222891003757618     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
2. Bryden, P. J., & Roy, E. A. (2006). Preferential reaching across regions of hemispace in adults and children. Developmental Psychobiology, 48, 121-136.
3. Cohen, R. G., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2004). Where objects are grasped reveals how grasps are planned: Generation and recall of motor plans. Experimental Brain Research, 157, 486-495.
4. Goodnow, J. J. (1977). Children drawing. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Goodnow, J. J., & Levine, R. (1973). The grammar of action: Sequence and syntax in children's copying. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 82-98.
6. Haggard, P. (1998). Planning of action sequences. Acta Psychologica, 99, 201-215.
7. Helbig, C. R., & Gabbard, C. (2004). What determines limb selection for reaching? Research Quarterly Exercise and Sport, 75, 47-59.
8. Janssen, L., Beuting, M., Meulenbroek, R., & Steenbergen, B. (2008). Combined effects of planning and execution constraints on bimanual task performance. Experimental Brain Research, 192, 61-73.
9. Jax, S. A., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2007). Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: Evidence that the dorsal stream does not only control visually guided actions in real time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 425-441.
10. Jones, L. A., & Lederman, S. J. (2006). Human hand function. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. MacKenzie, C. L., & Iberall, T. (1994). The grasping hand. Amsterdam: North Holland.
12. Mamolo, C. M., Roy, E. A., Bryden, P. J., & Rohr, L. E. (2004). The effects of skill demands and object position on the distribution of preferred hand reaches. Brain and Cognition, 55, 349-351.
13. Meulenbroek, R. G. J., & Thomassen, A. J. W. M. (1991). Strokedirection preferences in drawing and handwriting. Human Movement Science, 10, 247-270.
14. Rosenbaum, D. A. (2008). Reaching and walking: Reaching distance costs more than walking distance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1100-1104.
15. Rosenbaum, D. A. (2010). Human motor control (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press/Elsevier.
16. Rosenbaum, D. A., Cohen, R. G., Jax, S. A., Van Der Wel, R., & Weiss, D. J. (2007). The problem of serial order in behavior: Lashley's legacy. Human Movement Science, 26, 525-554.
17. Rosenbaum, D. A., Cohen, R. G., Meulenbroek, R. G., & Vaughan, J. (2006). Plans for grasping objects. In M. Latash & F. Lestienne (Eds.), Motor control and learning over the lifespan (pp. 9-25). New York: Springer.
18. Rosenbaum, D. A., Marchak, F., Barnes, H. J., Vaughan, J., Slotta, J.,&Jorgensen,M. (1990).Constraints for action selection: Overhand versus underhand grips. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and performance XIII: Motor representation and control (pp. 321-342). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Rosenbaum, D. A., Weber, R. J., Hazelett, W. M., & Hindorff, V. (1986). The parameter remapping effect in human performance: Evidence from tongue twisters and finger fumblers. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 710-725.
20. Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225-260.
21. Stelmach, G. E., Castiello, U., & Jeannerod, M. (1994). Orienting the finger opposition space during prehension movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 178-186.
22. Van Der Wel, R. P., Fleckenstein, R., Jax, S., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2007). Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: Evidence for abstract spatio-temporal forms in human motor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1117-1126.
23. Van Sommers, P. (1984). Drawing and cognition: Descriptive and experimental studies of graphic production processes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
24. Weigelt, M., Kunde, W., & Prinz, W. (2006). End-state comfort in bimanual object manipulation. Experimental Psychology, 53, 143-148.
25. Wing, A. M., Haggard, P., & Flanagan, R. (Eds.). (1996). Hand and brain: Neurophysiology and psychology of hand movement. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.