A zonal RANS-LES method to determine the flow over a high-lift configuration

Computers and Fluids

Volumn 39, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1241-1253

  Zhang, Q ^a   Schroder W ^a   Meinke, M ^a  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

High lift configuration; RANS LES coupling; Zonal RANS LES method

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL EFFORT; COMPUTER RESOURCES; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; FORCING TERMS; HIGH REYNOLDS NUMBER FLOWS; HIGH-LIFT CONFIGURATION; RANS-LES COUPLING; SMALL-SCALE STRUCTURES; TRANSITIONAL BOUNDARY LAYERS; TURBULENT FLUCTUATION; TURBULENT SHEAR STRESS; VELOCITY PROFILES; WALL-PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION;

AIRFOILS; CIRCULAR CYLINDERS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; REYNOLDS NUMBER;

ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER;

EID: 77952480799     PISSN: 00457930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2010.02.006     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Rumsey C.L., Ying S.X. Prediction of high lift: review of present CFD capability. Prog Aerosp Sci 2002, 38:145-180.
2. Mellen CP, Fröhlich J, Rodi W. Lessons from the European LESFOIL project on LES of flow around an airfoil. AIAA paper 95-0111; 2002.
3. Spalart PR. Trends in turbulence treatments. AIAA paper 2002-2306; 2000.
4. Labourasse E., Sagaut P. Reconstruction of turbulent fluctations using a hybrid RANS/LES approach. J Comput Phys 2002, 182:302-336.
5. Spalart PR, Leonard A. Direct numerical simulation of equilibrium turbulent boundary layers. In: Proceedings of the 5th symposium on turbulent shear flows, Ithaca (NY); 1985.
6. Lund T.S., Wu X., Squires K.D. On the generation of turbulent inflow conditions for boundary layer simulations. J Comput Phys 1998, 140:233-258.
7. El-Askary W, Schröder W, Meinke M. LES of compressible wall-bounded flows. AIAA paper 2003-3554; 2003.
8. Meinke M, El-Askary WA, Zhang Q, Schröder W. Large eddy simulation of airfoil flows. In: Proceedings of the 4th aeroacoustic workshop SWING+, Aachen (Germany); 2004.
9. Terracol M. A zonal RANS/LES approach for noise sources prediction. Flow Turbul Combust 2006, 77:161-184.
10. Sandham N.D., Yao Y.F., Lawal A.A. Large-eddy simulation of a transonic turbulent flow over a bump. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 2003, 24:584-595.
11. Spille A, Kaltenbach H-J, Generation of turbulent inflow data with a prescribed shear-stress profile. In: 3rd AFSOR conference on DNS and LES, Arlington; 2001.
12. Keating A., Piomelli U., Balaras E., Kaltenbach H.-J. A priori and a posteriori tests of inflow conditions for LES. Phys Fluids 2004, 16(12):4696-4712.
13. Meinke M., Schröder W., Krause E., Rister Th. A comparison of second- and sixth-order methods for large-eddy simulations. Comput Fluids 2002, 31:695-718.
14. Liou M.S., Steffen Ch.J. A new flux splitting scheme. J Comput Phys 1993, 107:23-39.
15. van Leer B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's method. J Comput Phys 1979, 32:101-136.
16. Boris J.P., Grinstein F.F., Oran E.S., Kolbe R.L. New insights into large eddy simulation. Fluid Dyn Res 1992, 10:199-228.
17. Fureby C., Grinstein F. Monotonically integrated large eddy simulation of free shear flows. AIAA J 1999, 37(5):544-556.
18. LeVeque R.J. Finite volume methods for hyperbolic problems 2002, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
19. Rütten F., Schröder W., Meinke M. Large-eddy simulation of low frequency oscillations of the Dean vortices in turbulent pipe bend flows. Phys Fluids 2005, 17:035107.
20. Spalart PR, Allmaras SR, A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. AIAA paper 92-0439; 1992.
21. Freund J. Proposed inflow/outflow boundary condition for direct computation of aerodynamic sound. AIAA J 1997, 35(4):740-742.
22. Schröder W., Meinke M., Ewert R., El-Askary W.A. LES based trailing-edge noise prediction. DNS/LES - progress and challenges 2001, 689-698. Greyden Press, Columbus (OH). C. Liu, L. Sakell, T. Beutner (Eds.).
23. Guo X., Schröder W., Meinke M. Large-eddy simulations of film cooling flows. Comput Fluids 2005, 35:587-606.
24. Schlüter J.U., Pitsch H., Moin P. LES inflow conditions for coupling with Reynolds averaged flow solvers. AIAA J 2004, 42(3):478-484.
25. Le H., Moin P., Kim J. Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over a backward-facing step. J Fluid Mech 1997, 330:349-374.
26. Batten P., Goldberg U., Chakravarthy S. Interfacing statistical turbulence closures with large-eddy simulation. AIAA J 2004, 42:485-492.
27. Moser R.D., Kim J., Mansour N.N. Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow up to Reτ=590. Phys Fluids 1999, 4(11):943-945.
28. Jeong J., Hussain F. On the identification of a vortex. J Fluid Mech 1995, 285:69-94.
29. Poinsot T.J., Lele S.K. Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible viscous flows. J Comput Phys 1992, 101:104-129.
30. W. Cabot. Local dynamic subgrid-scale models in channel flow. CTR annual research briefs - 1994, Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University; 1994. p. 143-59.
31. Lund TS, Kaltenbach H-J. Experiments with explicit filtering for LES using a finite-difference method. CTR annual research briefs - 1995, Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University; 1995, p. 91-105.
32. Würz W, Guidati S, Herr S. Aerodynamische Messungen im Laminarwindkanal im Rahmen des DFG-Forschungsprojektes SWING+ Testfall 2. Institute of Aerodynamics and Gasdynamics, University Stuttgart; 2002.
33. Morgan PE, Visbal MR, Large-eddy simulation of airfoil flows, AIAA paper 2003-777; 2003.
34. Rogallo R.S., Moin P. Numerical simulation of turbulent flows. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 1984, 16:99-137.
35. Garnier E., Mossi M., Sagaut P., Comte P., Deville M. On the use of shock-capturing schemes for large-eddy simulations. J Comput Phys 1999, 153:273-311.