Gaze scribing in physics problem solving

Eye Tracking Research and Applications Symposium (ETRA)

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 45-48

  Rosengrant, David ^a  

^a KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Education research; Gaze scribing; Physics problem solving

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION RESEARCH; ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT; EYE TRACKERS; EYE-TRACKING; GAZE SCRIBING; IN-FIELD; PHYSICS EDUCATION; SCAN PATTERNS;

RESEARCH; VIDEO RECORDING;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 77952411023     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1743666.1743676     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. CHI, M. FELTOVICH, P., AND GLASER R. 1981. Categoriza-tion and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices. Cognitive Science 5, 121-152.
2. DUCHOWSKI, A. 2007. Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice, 2nd Ed. Springer-Verlag.
3. DUIT, R., AND RHONEK, C. 1997 Learning and Understand-ing Key Concepts in Electricity. In Connecting Research in Physics Education with Teacher Education, A. Tiberghien, E.L.Jossem, and J. Barojas, Eds., The International Commission on Physics Education, 1-6
4. ENGELHARDT, P., AND BEICHNER, R 2004. Students' Understanding of Direct Current Resistive Electrical Circuits. American Journal of Physics, 72, 98-115.
5. ERICSSON, K., AND SIMON, H. 1984. Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
6. GERACE, W. 2001. Problem Solving and Conceptual Under-standing. In Proceedings of the 2001 Physics Education Re-search Conference, S. Franklin, J. Marx, K. Cummings, Eds., Physics Education Research Conference, Annual Conference, 33-36.
7. JOHSUA, S. 1984. Students' Interpretation of Simple Electrical Circuit Diagrams, International Journal of Science Education, 6, 12. 271-275.
8. KINDFIELD, A. 1994. Understanding a Basic Biological Process: Expert and Novice Models of Meiosis, Science Education, 78, 255-283.
9. KOZMA, R. AND RUSSELL, J. 1997. Multimedia and Under-standing: Expert and Novice Responses to Different Chemical Representations of Chemical Phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 9, 949-968.
10. LARKIN, J., MCDERMOTT, J., SIMON, D. AND SIMON, H. 1980. Expert and Novice Performance in Solving Physics Prob-lems. Science, 208, 1335-1342.
11. METIOUI, A., BRASSARD, C., LEVASSEUR, J. AND LA-VOICE, M. 1996. The Persistence of Students' Unfounded Beliefs About Electrical Circuits: The Case of Ohm's Law. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 2, 193-212.
12. ROSENGRANT, D., ETKINA, E., AND VAN HEUVELEN, A. 2007. An Overview of Recent Research on Multiple Representations. In Proceedings of the 2006 Physics Education Research Conference, L. McCullough, P. Heron, and L.Hsu, Eds., Physics Education Research Conference, Annual Conference, 149-152.
13. ROSENGRANT, D., THOMSON, C., AND MZOUGHI, T., (PRESS). Comparing Experts and Novices in Solving Electrical Circuit Problems With the Help of Eye-Tracking. Submitted to the Proceedings of the 2009 Physics Education Research Confe-rence.
14. STYLIANO, D. AND SILVER, E. 2004. The Role of Visual Representations in Advanced Mathematical Problem Solving: An Examination of Expert-Novice Similarities and Differences. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6, 4, 353-387.