Identification of failure type in corroded pipelines: A Bayesian probabilistic approach

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 179, Issue 1-3, 2010, Pages 628-634

  Breton, T ^a   Sanchez Gheno, J C ^b   Alamilla, J L ^c   Alvarez Ramirez, J ^d  

^a Institute Francais de Mecanique Avancee   (France)

^b PEMEX   (Mexico)

^c INSTITUTO MEXICANO DEL PETRÓLEO   (Mexico)

^d DEPARTAMENTO DE QUÍMICA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Bayesian statistics; Corrosion; Failure; Hazardous material pipelines; Modeling

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN; BAYESIAN STATISTICS; BOUNDARY VICINITY; BURST TESTS; CATASTROPHIC EVENT; CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS; CORRODED PIPELINES; CORROSION FAILURES; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; FAILURE; FIRE EVENT; INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE; LARGE SIZES; MAINTENANCE POLICY; MECHANICAL PERFORMANCE; MODEL PARAMETERS; MODELING PROCESS; OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY; PREDICTIVE MODELS; PROBABILISTIC APPROACHES; PROBABILISTIC MODELS; RISK EVALUATION; STEEL PIPELINE;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; BUILDING MATERIALS; CORROSION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; GAS INDUSTRY; HAZARDOUS MATERIALS; MAINTENANCE; PIPELINES; RANDOM VARIABLES; STATISTICAL TESTS;

LEAKAGE (FLUID);

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; CORROSION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FAILURE ANALYSIS; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; HAZARDOUS WASTE; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; MAINTENANCE; MODELING; PIPELINE; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORROSION; MECHANICAL STRESS; OIL INDUSTRY; PIPELINE; POLLUTION TRANSPORT; PROBABILITY; SHEAR STRESS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; BAYES THEOREM; CORROSION; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FOSSIL FUELS; HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PETROLEUM; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TRANSPORTATION;

EID: 77952410631     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.03.049     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Muhlbauer W.K. Pipeline Risk Management Manual 2003, Gulf Publishing. third edition.
2. Bonvicini S., Leonelli P., Spadoni G. Risk analysis of hazardous materials transportation: evaluating uncertainty by means of fuzzy logic. J. Hazard. Mater. 1998, 62:59-74.
3. Jo Y.-D., Ahn B.J. A method of quantitative risk assessment for transmission pipeline carrying natural gas. J. Hazard. Mater. 2005, 123:1-12.
4. Hashiguchi K. Elastoplasticity Theory 2009, Springer-Verlag, New York.
5. Al-Anezi M.A., Rao S., Lobley G.R. Pipeline failure by transit fatigue. J. Failure Anal. Prevent. 2009, 9:35-38.
6. Li Sh.-X., Yu Sh.-R., Zeng H.-L., Li J.-H., Liang R. Predicting corrosion remaining life of underground pipelines with a mechanically-based probabilistic model. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 2009, 65:162-166.
7. Shannon R.E.W. The failure behaviour of line pipe defects. Int. J. Press. Vess. Piping. 1974, 2:243-255.
8. th Symposium on Line Pipe Research 1979.
9. Dziubinski M., Fratczak M., Markowski A.S. Aspects of risk analysis associated with major failures of fuel pipelines. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2006, 19:399-408.
10. ASME B31G, Manual for determining the remaining strength of corroded pipelines, ASME B31G-1991, New York.
11. Mok D.H.B., Pick R.J., Glover A.G., Hoff R. Bursting of line pipe with long external corrosion. Int. J. Press. Vess. Piping 1991, 46:195-216.
12. P.H. Vieth, J.F. Kiefner, Database of corroded pipe tests, Pipeline Research Council International, Inc., No. L51689, 1993.
13. Fu B., Kirkwood M.G. Predicting failure pressure of internally corroded line pipe using the finite element method. OMAE 1995, V:175-184.
14. D.R. Stephens, B.N. Leis, M.D. Kurre, D.L. Rudland, Development of an alternative failure criterion for residual strength of corrosion defects in moderate to high toughness pipe, Pipeline Research Council International, Inc., No. L51794, 1999.
15. Cronin D.S., Pick R.J. Prediction of the failure pressure for complex corrosion defects. Int. J. Press. Vess. Piping 2002, 79:279-287.
16. B.N. Leis, T.P. Forte, Managing the integrity of early pipelines-crack growth analysis and revalidation intervals. Report prepared to U. S: Department of Transportation Research and Special Projects Agency, Contract DTRS56-03-T-0003, Battelle Memorial Institute, 2005.
17. Zhu X.K., Leis B.N. Average shear stress yield criterion and its application to plastic collapse analysis of pipelines. Int. J. Press. Vess. Piping 2006, 83:663-671.
18. Oliveros J., Alamilla J.L., Astudillo E., Flores O. Prediction of failure pressures in pipelines with corrosion defects. J. Press. Vess. Technol. 2008, 130:021703.
19. Suresh Kumara M., Sujataa M., Venkataswamya M.A., Bhaumik S.K. Failure analysis of a stainless steel pipeline. Eng. Failure Anal. 2008, 15:497-504.
20. Li Sh.-X., Zeng H.-L., Yua Sh.-R., Zhai X., Chen Sh.-P., Liang R., Yu L. A method of probabilistic analysis for steel pipeline with correlated corrosion defects. Corros. Sci. 2009, 51:3050-3056.
21. M. Bony, J.L. Alamilla, R. Vai, E. Flores, Failure pressure in corroded pipelines based on equivalent solutions for undamaged pipe, J. Press. Vess. Tech., in press (2010).
22. Boukharouba T., Elboujdaini M., Pluvinage G. Damage and Fracture Mechanics 2009, Springer-Verlag, New York.
23. Benjamin J.R., Cornell C.A. Probability, Statistics, and Decision for Civil Engineers 1970, McGraw-Hill.
24. McCay D.F., Rowe J.J., Whittier N., Sankaranarayanan S., Schmidt Etkin D. Estimation of potential impacts and natural resource damages of oil. J. Hazard. Mater. 2004, 107:11-25.
25. Sosa E., Alvarez-Ramirez J. Time-correlations in the dynamics of hazardous material pipelines incidents. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 165:1204-1209.
26. Kwun H., Kim S.Y., Matsumoto H., Vinogradov S. Detection of axial cracks in tube and pipe using torsional guided waves. AIP Conf. Proc. 2008, 975:193-199.