Looks and lies: The role of physical attractiveness in online dating self-presentation and deception

Communication Research

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 335-351

  Toma, Catalina L ^a   Hancock, Jeffrey T ^a  

^a Cornell University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Computer mediated communication; Deception; Online dating; Physical attractiveness; Self presentation

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952382087     PISSN: 00936502     EISSN: 15523810     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0093650209356437     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Ahuvia, A.C., & Adelman, M.B. (1992). Formal intermediaries in the marriage market: A typology and review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 54, 452-463.
2. Barber, N. (1995). The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 395-424.
3. Baumeister, R.F. (1982). A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 3-26.
4. Baumeister, R.F., & Jones, E.E. (1978). When self-presentation is constrained by the target's knowledge: Consistency and compensation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 608-618.
5. Buller, D.B., & Burgoon, J.K. (1996). Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory, 6, 203-243.
6. Buss, D.M. (1988). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 616-628.
7. Buss, D.M., & Schmitt, D.P. (1993). Social strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232.
8. Daly, M.M., & Wilson, M. (1995). Discriminative parental solicitude and the relevance of evolutionary models to the analysis of motivational systems. In M. S. Gassaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 1269-1286). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Ellison, N.B., Heino, R.D., & Gibbs, J.L. (January, 2006). Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2). Retrieved January 22, 2010, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue2/ellison.html.
10. Feingold, A. (1992). Gender differences in mate selection preferences: A test of the parental investment model. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 125-139.
11. Fiore, A.T. (2004). Romantic regressions: An analysis of behavior in online dating systems. Unpublished master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
12. Gangestad, S.W., & Scheyd, G.J. (2005). The evolution of human physical attractiveness. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 523-548.
13. Gangestad, S.W., & Thornhill, R. (1997). Human sexual selection and developmental stability. In A. Simpson & D. T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolutionary social psychology (pp. 169-195). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor.
15. Hancock, J. (2007). Digital deception: When, where, and how people lie online. In K. McKenna, T. Postmes, U. Reips, & A. Joinson (Eds.), Oxford handbook of Internet psychology (pp. 287-301). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
16. Hancock, J.T., & Toma, C.L. (2009). Putting your best face forward: The accuracy of online dating photographs. Journal of Communication, 59, 367-386.
17. Hirschman, E.C. (1987). People as products: Analysis of a complex marketing exchange. Journal of Marketing, 51, 98-108.
18. Jagger, E. (2001). Marketing Molly and Melville: Dating in a postmodern, consumer society. Sociology, 35, 39-57.
19. Jones, E.E., & Pittman, T.S. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (pp. 231-262). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Kellermann, K. (1992). Communication: Inherently strategic and primarily automatic. Communication Monographs, 59, 288-300.
21. Kock, N. (2004). The psychobiological model: Towards a new theory of computer-mediated communication based on Darwinian evolution. Organization Science, 15, 327-348.
22. Langlois, J.H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A.J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390-423.
23. Leary, M.R. (1996). Self-presentation: Impression management and interpersonal behavior. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
24. Leary, M.R., & Kowalski, R.M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 34-47.
25. Lynn, M., & Bolig, R. (1985). Personal advertisements: Sources of data about relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 377-383.
26. McKenna, K.Y.A., & Bargh, J. (2000). Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implications of the Internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 57-75.
27. Riggio, R.E., Widaman, K.F., Tucker, J.S., & Salinas, C. (1991). Beauty is more than skin deep: Components of attractiveness. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 423-469.
28. Scheib, J.E., Gangestad, S.W., & Thornhill, R. (1999). Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London B., 266, 1913-1917.
29. Schlenker, B.R. (2002). Self-presentation. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 492-518). New York: Guilford.
30. Singh, D. (2004). Mating strategies of young women: Role of physical attractiveness. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 43-54.
31. Sprecher, S. (1989). The importance to males and females of physical attractiveness, earning potential, and expressiveness in initial attraction. Sex Roles, 21, 591-607.
32. Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S.W. (1993). Human facial beauty: Averageness, symmetry and parasite resistance. Human Nature, 4, 237-269.
34. Toma, C.L., Hancock, J.T., & Ellison, N.B. (2008). Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1023-1036.
35. Trivers, R. (1985). Social evolution. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.
36. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
37. Walther, J.B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-44.
38. Walther, J.B. (2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2538-2557.
39. Walther, J.B., & Parks, M.R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529-563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40. Walther, J.B., Gay, G., & Hancock, J.T. (2005). How do communication and technology researchers study the Internet? Journal of Communication, 55, 632-657.
41. Whitty, M. (2007). Love letters: The development of romantic relationships throughout the ages. In K. McKenna, T. Postmes, U. Reips, & A. Joinson (Eds.), Oxford handbook of Internet psychology (pp. 287-301). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.