Cues of intraguild predators affect the distribution of intraguild prey

Oecologia

Volumn 163, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 335-340

  Choh, Yasuyuki ^a,b   van der Hammen, Tessa ^a   Sabelis, Maurice W ^a   Janssen, Arne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Ideal free distribution; Intraguild predation; Phytoseiid mites; Predator avoidance; Predator prey interaction

Indexed keywords

ANTIPREDATOR DEFENSE; COEXISTENCE; CONSPECIFIC; IDEAL FREE DISTRIBUTION; INTRAGUILD PREDATION; JUVENILE; MITE; PREDATION RISK; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ECOSYSTEM; EGG LAYING; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FOOD CHAIN; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MITE; OOCYTE; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDATION; TIME;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; ECOSYSTEM; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FOOD CHAIN; MITES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; OVIPOSITION; OVUM; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; TIME FACTORS;

ACARI; IPHISEIUS DEGENERANS; NEOSEIULUS CUCUMERIS; PHYTOSEIIDAE;

EID: 77952321347     PISSN: 00298549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-010-1605-5     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Agarwala BK, Yasuda H, Kajita Y (2003) Effect of conspecific and heterospecific feces on foraging and oviposition of two predatory ladybirds: role of fecal cues in predator avoidance. J Chem Ecol 29: 357-376.
2. Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. Wiley, New York.
3. De Moraes GJ, McMurtry JA, Denmark HA, Campos CB (2004) A revised catalog of the mite family Phytoseiidae, 1st edn. Magnolia, Auckland.
4. Faraji F, Janssen A, van Rijn PCJ, Sabelis MW (2000) Kin recognition by the predatory mite Iphiseius degenerans: discrimination among own, conspecific, and heterospecific eggs. Ecol Entomol 25: 147-155.
5. Fretwell SD (1972) Populations in a seasonal environment. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
6. Fretwell SD, Lucas HL (1970) On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Acta Biotheor 19: 16-36.
7. Heithaus MR (2001) Habitat selection by predators and prey in communities with asymmetrical intraguild predation. Oikos 92: 542-554.
8. HilleRisLambers R, Dieckmann U (2003) Competition and predation in simple food webs: intermediately strong trade-offs maximize coexistence. Proc Biol Sci 270: 2591-2598.
9. Holt RD, Polis GA (1997) A theoretical framework for intraguild predation. Am Nat 149: 745-764.
10. Janssen A, Bruin J, Jacobs G, Schraag R, Sabelis MW (1997) Predators use volatiles to avoid prey patches with conspecifics. J Anim Ecol 66: 223-232.
11. Janssen A, Sabelis MW, Magalhães S, Montserrat M, van der Hammen T (2007) Habitat structure affects intraguild predation. Ecology 88: 2713-2719.
12. Lima SL (1998) Stress and decision making under the risk of predation: recent developments from behavioral, reproductive, and ecological perspectives. Adv Study Behav 27: 215-290.
13. Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68: 619-640.
14. Magalhães S, Tudorache C, Montseratt M, van Maanen R, Sabelis MW, Janssen A (2005) Diet of intraguild predators affects antipredator behavior in intraguild prey. Behav Ecol 16: 364-370.
15. Montserrat M, Janssen A, Magalhães S, Sabelis MW (2006) To be an intraguild predator or a cannibal: is prey quality decisive? Ecol Entomol 31: 430-436.
16. Montserrat M, Bas C, Magalhães S, Sabelis MW, de Roos AM, Janssen A (2007) Predators induce egg retention in prey. Oecologia 150: 699-705.
17. Montserrat M, Magalhães S, Sabelis MW, de Roos AM, Janssen A (2008) Patterns of exclusion in an intraguild predator-prey system depend on initial conditions. J Anim Ecol 77: 624-630.
18. Mylius SD, Klumpers K, de Roos AM, Persson L (2001) Impact of intraguild predation and stage structure on simple communities along a productivity gradient. Am Nat 158: 259-276.
19. Nakashima Y, Birkett MA, Pye BJ, Powell W (2006) Chemically mediated intraguild predator avoidance by aphid parasitoids: interspecific variability in sensitivity to semiochemical trails of ladybird predators. J Chem Ecol 32: 1989-1998.
20. Persons MH, Rypstra AL (2001) Wolf spiders show graded antipredator behavior in the presence of chemical cues from different sized predators. J Chem Ecol 27: 2493-2504.
21. Persson L, Eklov P (1995) Prey refuges affecting interactions between piscivorous perch and juvenile perch and roach. Ecology 76: 70-81.
22. Polis GA, Holt R (1992) Intraguild predation: the dynamics of complex trophic interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 7: 151-154.
23. Polis GA, Winemiller KO (1996) Food webs. Chapman & Hall, New York.
24. Polis GA, Myer CA, Holt RD (1989) The ecology and evolution of intraguild predation: potential competitors that eat each other. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20: 297-330.
25. R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
26. Rosenheim JA, Kaya HK, Ehler HE, Marois JJ, Jaffee BA (1995) Intraguild predation among biological control agents-theory and evidence. Biol Control 5: 303-335.
27. Rypstra AL, Schmidt JM, Reif BD, DeVito J, Persons MH (2007) Tradeoffs involved in site selection and foraging in wolf spider: effects of substrate structure and predation risk. Oikos 116: 853-863.
28. Sih A (1998) Game theory and predator-prey response race. In: Dugatkin LA, Reeve HK (eds) Advances in game theory and study of animal behavior. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 221-238.
29. Stephens D, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
30. van Rijn PCJ, Tanigoshi LK (1999) Pollen as food source for the predatory mites Iphiseius degenerans and Neoseiulus cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseiidae): dietary range and life history. Exp Appl Acarol 23: 785-802.
31. Venzon M, Janssen A, Pallini A, Sabelis MW (2000) Diet of a polyphagous arthropod predator affects refuge seeking of its thrips prey. Anim Behav 60: 369-375.
32. Wilder SM, Rypstra AL (2004) Chemical cues from an introduced predator (Mantodea, Mantidae) reduce the movement and foraging of a native wolf spider (Araneae, Lycosidae) in the laboratory. Environ Entomol 33: 1032-1036.