Does screening history explain the ethnic differences in stage at diagnosis of cervical cancer in New Zealand?

International Journal of Epidemiology

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 156-165

  Brewer, Naomi ^a   Pearce, Neil ^a   Jeffreys, Mona ^b   Borman, Barry ^a   Ellison Loschmann, Lis ^a  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

New Zealand; Screening; Uterine cervical neoplasms

Indexed keywords

CANCER; ETHNICITY; RISK FACTOR; RURAL SOCIETY; SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS; SURVIVAL; WOMENS HEALTH;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASIAN; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER STAGING; CONTROLLED STUDY; ETHNIC DIFFERENCE; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAORI; NEW ZEALAND; PACIFIC ISLANDER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDENTIAL AREA; SOCIAL STATUS; URBAN RURAL DIFFERENCE; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA; ETHNOLOGY; MORTALITY; RURAL POPULATION; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICS; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR; VAGINA SMEAR;

NEW ZEALAND;

FEMALE; HUMANS; NEOPLASM STAGING; NEW ZEALAND; RURAL POPULATION; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 77952317403     PISSN: 03005771     EISSN: 14643685     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyp303     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ministry of Health. Cancer: New Registrations and Deaths 2005. Revised Edition. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Health, 2009.
2. The Descriptive Epidemiology Group of IARC. Globocan 2002. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2002.
3. National Cervical Screening Programme. Cervical Screening in New Zealand. A Brief Statistical Review of the First Decade. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Health, 2005.
4. Brewer N, McKenzie F, Wong KC, Ellison-Loschmann L. National Cervical Screening Programme. Annual Monitoring Report 2006. Wellington, New Zealand: Centre for Public Health Research, Massey University, 2008.
5. Paul S, Tobias M, Wright C. Setting Outcome Targets for the National Cervical Screening Programme. A Report for the National Screening Unit. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Health, 2005.
6. National Screening Unit. Guidelines for Cervical Screening in New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Health, 2008.
7. Brewer N, Pearce N, Jeffreys M, White P, Ellison-Loschmann L. Demographic differences in stage at diagnosis and cervical cancer survival in New Zealand 1994-2005. J Women's Health 2009;18:955-63.
8. Sadler L, Priest P, Peters J, Crengle S, Jackson R. The New Zealand Cervical Cancer Audit Report. Whakamātau mate pukupuku taiawa o Aotearoa. Screening of Women with Cervical Cancer, 2000-2002. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Health, 2004.
9. Benedet JL, Pecorelli S, Ngan HYS et al. Staging Classifications and Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gynaecological Cancers. Geneva, Switzerland: International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2006.
10. New Zealand Department of Statistics. Ethnicity in New Zealand: Recommendations for a Standard Classification. Discussion Paper. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Department of Statistics, 1990.
11. Ministry of Health. Cancer in New Zealand: Trends and Projections. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Health, 2002.
12. Ministry of Health. Cancer Patient Survival Covering the Period 1994 to 2003. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Health, 2006.
13. Crampton P, Salmond C, Kirkpatrick R. Degrees of Deprivation in New Zealand. An Atlas of Socioeconomic Difference. 2nd edn. Auckland, New Zealand: David Bateman Ltd, 2004.
14. Statistics New Zealand. Classification of Urban Area. Wellington, New Zealand: Statistics New Zealand, 2008.
15. Young JL Jr, Roffers SD, Ries LAG, Fritz AG, Hurlbut AA (eds). Seer Summary Staging Manual - 2000: Codes and Coding Instructions. Bethesda, MD, USA: National Cancer Institute, NIH Pub. No. 01-4969, 2001.
16. Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A et al. International Classification of Diseases for Oncology. 3rd edn. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2000.
17. Vizcaino AP, Moreno V, Bosch FX, Munoz N, Barros-Dios XM, Parkin DM. International trends in the incidence of cervical cancer: I. Adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous cell carcinomas. Int J Cancer 1998;75: 536-45.
18. Health Canada. Cervical Cancer Screening in Canada: 1998 Surveillance Report. Ottawa, Canada: Health Canada, 2002.
19. Ministry of Health. National Cervical Screening Programme. Interim Operational Policy and Quality Standards. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Health, 2000.
20. Spayne J, Ackerman I, Milosevic M, Seidenfeld A, Covens A, Paszat L. Invasive cervical cancer: A failure of screening. Eur J Public Health 2007;18:162-65.
21. Sasieni P, Adams J, Cuzick J. Benefit of cervical screening at different ages: evidence from the UK audit of screening histories. Br J Cancer 2003;89:88-93.
22. Independent Monitoring Group of the National Cervical Screening Programme. National Cervical Screening Programme. Annual Monitoring Report 2001. Dunedin, New Zealand: Hugh Adam Cancer Epidemiology Unit, University of Otago, 2004.
23. Robson B, Harris R editors. Hauora: Māori Standards of Health IV. A Study of the Years 2000-2005. Wellington, New Zealand: Te Ropu Rangahau Hauora a Eru Pomare, 2007.
24. Haynes R, Pearce J, Barnett R. Cancer survival in New Zealand: ethnic, social and geographical inequalities. Soc Sci Med 2008;67:928-37.
25. Tobias M, Yeh LC. How much does health care contribute to health inequality in New Zealand? Aust NZ J Public Health 2007;31:207-10.
26. McFadden K, McConnell D, Salmond C, Crampton P, Fraser J. Socioeconomic deprivation and the incidence of cervical cancer in New Zealand: 1988-1998. NZ Med J 2004;117:U1172.
27. Metcalf PA, Scragg RR, Schaaf D, Dyall L, Black PN, Jackson RT. Comparison of different markers of socioeconomic status with cardiovascular disease and diabetes risk factors in the diabetes, heart and health survey. NZ Med J 2008;121:45-56.
28. Coppell K. National Cervical Screening Programme. Annual Monitoring Report 2002. Wellington, New Zealand: National Screening Unit, Ministry of Health, 2006.
29. Coppell K. National Cervical Screening Programme. Annual Monitoring Report 2003. Wellington, New Zealand: National Screening Unit: Ministry of Health, 2006.
30. Brewer N, McKenzie F, Travier N, Jeffreys M. on be half of the NCSP IMG. National Cervical Screening Programme. Annual Monitoring Report 2004. Wellington, New Zealand: Centre for Public Health Research, Massey University, 2007.
31. Brewer N, McKenzie F, Wong KC, Ellison-Loschmann L. National Cervical Screening Programme. Annual Monitoring Report 2005. Wellington, New Zealand: Centre for Public Health Research, Massey University, 2008.
32. Stuart GC, McGregor SE, Duggan MA, Nation JG. Review of the screening history of Alberta women with invasive cervical cancer. Can Med Assoc J 1997;157:513-19.
33. Sung H-Y, Kearney KA, Miller M, Kinney W, Sawaya GF, Hiatt RA. Papanicolaou smear history and diagnosis of invasive cervical carcinoma among members of a large prepaid health plan. Cancer 2000;88:2283-89.
34. Andrae B, Kemetli L, Sparen P et al. Screening-preventa- ble cervical cancer risks: Evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100:622-29.
35. Bos AB, Rebolj M, Habbema JD, van Ballegooijen M. Nonattendance is still the main limitation for the effectiveness of screening for cervical cancer in the Netherlands. Int J Cancer 2006;119:2372-75.
36. Krane JF, Granter SR, Trask CE, Hogan CL, Lee KR. Papanicolaou smear sensitivity for the detection of adeno- carcinoma of the cervix: a study of 49 cases. Cancer 2001; 93:8-15.
37. Boon ME, de Graaff Guilloud JC, Kok LP, Olthof PM, van Erp EJM. Efficacy of screening for cervical squamous and adenocarcinoma. The Dutch experience. Cancer 1987;59:862-66.
38. Boddington MM, Spriggs AI, Cowdell RH. Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: cytological evidence of a long preclinical evolution. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1976;83:900-3.
39. Sasieni P, Adams J. Changing rates of adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix in England. Lancet 2001;357:1490-93.
40. Ratima K, Paul C, Skegg DC. Cervical smear histories of Maori women developing invasive cervical cancer. NZ Med J 1993;106:519-21.
41. Downs LS, Smith JS, Scarinci I, Flowers L, Parham G. The disparity of cervical cancer in diverse populations. Gynecol Oncol 2008;109:S22-30.
42. Harris R, Tobias M, Jeffreys M, Waldegrave K, Karlsen S, Nazroo J. Racism and health: the relationship between experience of racial discrimination and health in New Zealand. Soc Sci Med 2006;63:1428-41.
43. Harris R, Tobias M, Jeffreys M, Waldegrave K, Karlsen S, Nazroo J. Effects of self-reported racial discrimination and deprivation on Māori health and inequalities in New Zealand: cross-sectional study. Lancet 2006;367: 2005-9.