Review of the screening history of Alberta women with invasive cervical cancer

CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal

Volumn 157, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 513-519

  Stuart, Gavin C E ^a,d   Elizabeth McGregor, S ^a   Duggan, Maire A ^b   Nation, Jill G ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b TOM BAKER CANCER CENTRE   (Canada)

^c Alberta Cancer Board   (Canada)

^d NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOCARCINOMA; ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; CANADA; CANCER INVASION; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER STAGING; CYTOLOGY; DEMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

EID: 0030809997     PISSN: 08203946     EISSN: 14882329     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Miller AB. Planning cancer control strategies. Chronic Dis Can 1992-13(1): S22-5.
2. National Cancer Institute of Canada. Canadian cancer statistics 1996, Toronto: the Institute; Jan 1996.
3. Department of I lealth. The health of the nation: a strategffor health in England. Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Health by command of Her Majesty, July 1992. London: ILMSO; 1993.
4. Sigurdsson K. Effect of organized screening on the risk of cervical cancer. Evaluation of screening activity in Iceland, 1964-1991. Int J Cancer 1993;54: 563-70.
5. Alberta Cancer Registry 1992 annual report. Calgary: Alberta Cancer Board; 1995.
6. Creasman WT: New gynecologic cancer staging [editorial]. Gynecol Oncol 1995:58:157-8.
7. The Bethesda System for reporting cervical/vaginal cytologie diagnoses: revised after the second National Cancer Institute Workshop, April 29-30, 1991. Acta Cytol 1993;37:115-24.
8. Miller AB, Anderson G, Brisson J, LaidlawJ, Le Petrie N, Malcolmson P, et al. Report of a National Workshop on Screening for Cancer of the Cervix. Can McdAssocJ 1991;145:1301-25.
9. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd cd. New York- John Wiley & Sons; 1981.
10. Janerich DT, Hadjimichael O, Schwanz PE, Lowell DM, Aleigs JW, Merino MJ, et al. The screening histories of women with invasive cervical cancer, Connecticut. Am J Public Health 1995;85:791-4.
11. Sasieni PD, Cuzick J, Lynch-Farmery E. Estimating the efficacy of screening by auditing smear histories of women with and without cervical cancer. The National Co-ordinating Network for Cervical Screening Working Group. Br J Cancer 1996;73:1001-5.
12. Benoit AG, Krepart GV, Lotocki RJ. Results of prior cytologie screening in patients with a diagnosis of stage I carcinoma of the cervix. Am J Obstet Gymcol 1984; 148:690-4.
13. Carmichael JA, Jeffrey JF, Steele HD, Ohlke ID. The cytological history of 245 patients developing invasive cervical carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynccol 1984; 148:685-90.
14. Sweet L, Tesch AI, Dryer D, AIcAleer C. A review of the cervical cytology screening history of PEI women diagnosed with carcinoma of the cervix. 1981-1986. Chronic Dis Can 1991Jan:l-3.
15. Walter SD, Clarke EA, Hatcher J, Stitt LW. A comparison of physician and patient reports of Pap smear histories. J Clin Epidaiiiol 1988;41:401-10.
16. AlcKenna AIT, Speers AI, Alallin K, Warneckc R. Agreement between patient self-reports and medical records for Pap smear histories. AniJPrcv Med 1992;8.-287-91.
17. IARC Working Group on Cervical Cancer Screening. Summary chapter. In: Hakama AI, Aliller AB, Day NE, editors. Screening for cancer of the uterine cervix [IARC sei pub no 76]. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 1986:133-42.