Preliminary soilwater conductivity analysis to date clandestine burials of homicide victims

Forensic Science International

Volumn 198, Issue 1-3, 2010, Pages 126-133

  Pringle, Jamie K ^a   Cassella, John P ^b   Jervis, John R ^a  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b STAFFORDSHIRE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Clandestine grave; Conductivity; Forensic geoscience; PBI; PMI

Indexed keywords

WATER;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CADAVER; CARCASS; CONDUCTANCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRIME; DECOMPOSITION; DOMESTIC ANIMAL; FORENSIC IDENTIFICATION; HOMICIDE; NONHUMAN; POSTHUMOUS CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RURAL AREA; SOIL ANALYSIS; SWINE; TEMPERATURE; TIME; UNITED KINGDOM; WASTE DISPOSAL; WATER ANALYSIS;

EID: 77952291309     PISSN: 03790738     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.02.005     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Ruffell A., McKinley J. Forensic geoscience: applications of geology, geomorphology and geophysics to criminal investigations. Earth Sci. Rev. 2005, 69:235-247.
2. Brilis G.M., Gerlach C.L., van Waasbergen R.J. Remote sensing tools assist in environmental forensics. Part I. Digital tools-traditional methods. Environ. Forensics 2000, 1:63-67.
3. Brilis G.M., van Waasbergen R.J., Stokely P.M., Gerlach C.L. Remote sensing tools assist in environmental forensics. Part II. Digital tools. Environ. Forensics 2000, 1:1-7.
4. Lasseter A., Jacobi K.P., Farley R., Hensel L. Cadaver dog and handler team capabilities in the recovery of buried human remains in the Southeastern United States. J. Forensic Sci. 2003, 48:1-5.
5. Ruffell A., McKinley J. Geoforensics 2009, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, p. 332.
6. Owsley D.W. Techniques for locating burials, with emphasis on the probe. J. Forensic Sci. 1995, 40:735-740.
7. Ruffell A.A. Burial location using cheap and reliable quantitative probe instruments. Forensic Sci. Int. 2005, 163:207-211.
8. France D.L., Griffin T.J., Swanburg J.G., Lindemann J.W., Davenport G.C., Trammell V., Armbrust C.T., Kondratieff B., Nelson A., Castellano K., Hopkins D. A multidisciplinary approach to the detection of clandestine graves. J. Forensic Sci. 1992, 37:1445-1458.
9. Nobes D.C. The search for " Yvonne": a case example of the delineation of a grave using near-surface geophysical methods. J. Forensic Sci. 2000, 45:715-721.
10. Cheetham P. Forensic geophysical survey. Forensic Archaeology: Advances in Theory and Practice 2005, 62-95. Routledge Publishers, Abingdon. J. Hunter, M. Cox (Eds.).
11. Hunter J.R., Brickley M.B., Bourgeois J., Bouts W., Bourguignon L., Hubrecht F., de Winne J., Van Haaster H., Hakbijl T., de Jong H., Smits L., Van Wijngaarden L.H., Luschen M. Forensic archaeology, forensic anthropology and Human Rights in Europe. Sci. Justice 2001, 41:173-178.
12. Bull P.A, Morgan R.M., Freudiger-Bonzon J. A critique of the present use of some geochemical techniques in geoforensic analysis. Forensic Sci. Int. 2008, 178:e35-e40.
13. Marshall T.K. Estimating the time of death: the use of the cooling formula in the study of post-mortem body cooling. J. Forensic Sci. 1962, 7:189-210.
14. Green M.A., Wright J.C. Postmortem interval estimation from body temperature data only. Forensic Sci. Int. 1985, 28:35-46.
15. Henssge C. Death time estimation in case work. I. The rectal temperature time of death nomogram. Forensic Sci. Int. 1988, 38:209-236.
16. von Zuben C.J., Bassanezi R.C., von Zuben F.J. Theoretical approaches to forensic entomology. II. Mathematical model of larval development. J. Appl. Entamol. 1998, 12:275-278.
17. Arnaldos M., García I., Romera E., Presa J.J., Luna A. Estimation of postmortem interval in real cases based on experimentally obtained entomological evidence. Forensic Sci. Int. 2005, 149:57-65.
18. Marchenko M.I. Medicolegal relevance of cadaver entomofauna for the determination of the time of death. Forensic Sci. Int. 2001, 120:89-109.
19. Madea B., Herrmann N., Henbge C. Precision of estimating the time since death by vitrous potassium-comparison of two different equations. Forensic Sci. Int. 1990, 46:277-284.
20. Singh D., Prashad R., Parkash C., Bansal Y.S., Sharma S.K., Pandey A.N. Linearization of the relationship between serum sodium, potassium concentration, their ratio and time since death in Chandigarh zone of north-west India. Forensic Sci. Int. 2002, 130:1-7.
21. Sabucedo A.J., Furton J.K. Cardiac troponin I: a time since death marker. Forensic Sci. Int. 2003, 134:11-16.
22. Madea B. Is there recent progress in the estimation of the post-mortem interval by means of thanatochemistry?. Forensic Sci. Int. 2005, 151:139-149.
23. Payne J.A. A summer carrion study of the baby pig Sus scrofa Linnaeus. Ecology 1965, 46:592-602.
24. Carter D.O., Tibbett M. Decomposition chemistry in a burial environment. Soil Analysis in Forensic Taphonomy: Chemical and Biological Effects of Buried Human Remains 2009, 225-246. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA. M. Tibbett, D.O. Carter (Eds.).
25. Kashyap V.K., Pillay V.V. Efficacy of entomological methods in estimation of post mortem interval: a comparative analysis. Forensic Sci. Int. 1989, 40:245-250.
26. Perry Ill W.L., Bass W.M., Riggsby W.S., Sirotkin K. The autodegradation of Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) in human rib bone and its relationship to the time interval since death. J. Forensic Sci. 1988, 33:144-153.
27. Vass A.A., Bass W.M., Wolt J.D., Foss J.E., Ammons J.T. Time since death determinations of human cadavers using soil solution. J. Forensic Sci. 1992, 37:1236-1253.
28. Jarvis D.R. Nitrogen levels in long bones from coffin burials interred for periods of 26-90 years. Forensic Sci. Int. 1997, 85:199-208.
29. Ramsthaler F., Kreutz K., Zipp K., Verhoff M.A. Dating skeletal remains with luminol-chemiluminescence: validity, intra- and inter-observer error. Forensic Sci. Int. 2009, 187:47-50.
30. Forbes S.L. Potential determinants of postmortem and postburial interval of buried remains. Soil Analysis in Forensic Taphonomy: Chemical and Biological Effects of Buried Human Remains 2009, 225-246. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA. M. Tibbett, D.O. Carter (Eds.).
31. McKeown A.H., Bennett J.L. A preliminary investigation of postmortem tooth loss. J. Forensic Sci. 1995, 40:755-757.
32. Swift B., Lauder I., Black S., Norris J. An estimation of the post-mortem interval in human skeletal remains: a radionuclide and trace element approach. Forensic Sci. Int. 2001, 117:73-87.
33. Forbes S.L. Time since death: a novel approach to dating skeletal remains. Aust. J. Forensic Sci. 2004, 36:67-72.
34. Forbes S.L., Dent B.B., Stuart B.H. The effect of soil type on adipocere formation. Forensic Sci. Int. 2005, 154:35-43.
35. Van Belle L.E., Carter D.O., Forbes S.L. Measurement of ninhydrin reactive nitrogen influx into gravesoil during aboveground and belowground carcass (Sus domesticus) decomposition. Forensic Sci. Int. 2009, 193:37-41.
36. Rodriguez W.C. Decomposition of buried and submerged bodies. Forensic Taphonomy: The Postmortem Fate of Human Remains 1997, 459-468. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA. W.D. Haglund, M.H. Sorg (Eds.).
37. Swift M.J., Heal O.W., Anderson J.M. Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems 1979, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
38. Hopkins D.W. The role of soil organisms in terrestrial decomposition. Soil Analysis in Forensic Taphonomy: Chemical and Biological Effects of Buried Human Remains 2009, 53-66. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA. M. Tibbett, D.O. Carter (Eds.).
39. Haslam T.C., Tibbett M. Soils of contrasting pH affect the decomposition of buried mammalian (Ovis aries) skeletal muscle tissue. J. Forensic Sci. 2009, 54:900-904.
40. Henssge C., Madea B. Estimation of the time since death. Forensic Sci. Int. 2007, 165:182-184.
41. Bisegna P., Henßge C., Althaus L., Guisti G. Estimation of the time since death: sudden increase of ambient temperature. Forensic Sci. Int. 2008, 176:196-199.
42. Karhunen P.J., Goebeler S., Winberg O., Tuominen M. Time of death of victims found in cold water environment. Forensic Sci. Int. 2008, 176:17-22.
43. Carter D.O., Yellowlees D., Tibbett M. Temperature affects microbial decomposition of cadavers (Rattus rattus) in contrasting soils. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2008, 40:129-137.
44. Carter D.O., Tibbett M. Cadaver decomposition and soil: processes. Soil Analysis in Forensic Taphonomy: Chemical and Biological Effects of Buried Human Remains 2009, 29-52. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, USA. M. Tibbett, D.O. Carter (Eds.).
45. Breitmeier D., Graefe-Kirci U., Albrecht K., Weber N., Tröger H.D., Kleemann W.J. Evaluation of the correlation between time corpses spent in in-ground graves and findings at exhumation. Forensic Sci. Int. 2005, 154:218-223.
46. Rodriguez W.C., Bass W.M. Insect activity and its relationship to decay rates of human cadavers in East Tennessee. J. Forensic Sci. 1983, 28:423-432.
47. Turner B., Wiltshire P. Experimental validation of forensic evidence: a study of the decomposition of buried pigs in heavy clay soil. Forensic Sci. Int. 1999, 101:113-122.
48. Forbes S.L., Dent B.B., Stuart B.H. The effect of the burial environment on adipocere formation. Forensic Sci. Int. 2005, 154:24-34.
49. Wilson A.S., Janaway R.C., Holland A.D., Dodson H.I., Barran E., Pollard A.M. Modelling the buried human body environment in upland climes using three contrasting field sites. Forensic Sci. Int. 2007, 169:6-18.
50. Vass A.A., Wolt J.D., Foss J.E., Ammons J.T., Bass W.M. Time since death determinations of human cadavers using soil solutions. J. Forensic Sci. 2002, 37:1236-1253.
51. Vass A.A., Barshick S.-A., Sega G., Caton J., Skeen J.T., Love J.C., Synstelien J.A. Decomposition chemistry of human remains: a new method for determining the post mortem interval. J. Forensic Sci. 2002, 47:542-553.
52. Matias M.J., Marques da Silva M., Goncalves L., Peralta C., Grangeia C., Martinho E. An investigation into the use of geophysical methods in the study of aquifer contamination by graveyards. Near Surf. Geophys. 2004, 2:131-136.
53. Young C.P., Blackmore P.J., Reynolds P.J., Leavens A. Pollution potential of cemeteries, draft guidance. R&D Technical Report P223 1999, Environmental Agency, Bristol, UK.
54. Hopkins D.W., Wiltshire P.E.J., Turner B.D. Microbial characteristics of soils from graves: an investigation at the interface of soil microbiology and forensic science. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2000, 14:283-288.
55. Knight M.J., Dent B.B. A watery grave-the role of hydrogeology in cemetery practise, Australian Cemeteries and Crematoria Association 1995. National Conference in Sydney, Reproduced in Institute of Burial and Cremation Administration 1996.
56. Spongberg A.L., Becks P.M. Inorganic soil contamination from cemetery leachate. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2000, 117:313-327.
57. Carter D.O., Yellowlees D., Tibbett M. Using ninhydrin to detect gravesoil. J. Forensic Sci. 2008, 53:397-400.
58. Vass A.A., Smith R.R., Thompson C.V., Burnett M.N., Wolf D.A., Synstelien J.A., Eckenrode B.A., Dulgerian N. Decompositional odor analysis database-phase I. J. Forensic Sci. 2004, 49:760-769.
59. Vass A.A., Smith R.R., Thompson C.V., Burnett M.N., Dulgerian N., Eckenrode B.A. Odor analysis of decomposing buried human remains. J. Forensic Sci. 2008, 53:384-391.
60. Dekeirsschieter J., Verheggen F.J., Gohy M., Hubrecht F., Bourguignon L., Lognay G., Haubruge E. Cadaveric volatile organic compounds released by decaying pig carcasses (Sus domesticus) in different biotopes. Forensic Sci. Int. 2009, 189:46-53.
61. Benninger L.A., Carter D.O., Forbes S.L. The biochemical alteration of soil beneath a decomposing carcass. Forensic Sci. Int. 2008, 180:70-75.
62. Janaway R.C. Decomposition of materials associated with buried cadavers. Soil Analysis in Forensic Taphonomy: Chemical and Biological Effects of Buried Human Remains 2009, 153-201. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA. M. Tibbett, D.O. Carter (Eds.).
63. Ellwood B.B. Electrical resistivity surveys in two historical cemeteries in northeast Texas: a method for delineating unidentified burial shafts. Hist. Archaeol. 1990, 24:91-98.
64. Pringle J.K., Jervis J.R., Cassella J.P., Cassidy N.J. Time-lapse geophysical investigations over a simulated urban clandestine grave. J. Forensic Sci. 2008, 53:1405-1416.
65. Jervis J.R., Pringle J.K., Cassella J.P., Tuckwell G.T. Using soil and groundwater to understand resistivity surveys over a simulated clandestine grave. Criminal and Environmental Soil Forensics 2009, 271-284. Springer Publishing, Dortrecht, The Netherlands. K. Ritz, L. Dawson, D. Miller (Eds.).
66. Jervis J.R., Pringle J.K., Tuckwell G.T. Time-lapse resistivity surveys over simulated clandestine burials. Forensic Sci. Int. 2009, 192:7-13.
67. Harrison M., Donnelly L.J. Locating concealed homicide victims: developing the role of geoforensics. Criminal and Environmental Soil Forensics 2009, 197-219. Springer Publishing, Dortrecht, The Netherlands. K. Ritz, L. Dawson, D. Miller (Eds.).
68. Grossmann J., Udluft P. The extraction of soil water by the suction-cup method: a review. J. Soil Sci. 1991, 42:83-93.
69. VanLaerHoven S.L., Anderson G.S. Insect succession on buried carrion in two biogeoclimatic zones of British Columbia. J. Forensic Sci. 1999, 44:32-43.
70. Prangnell J., McGowan G. Soil temperature calculation for burial site analysis. Forensic Sci. Int. 2009, 191:104-109.
71. Jaggers K.A., Rogers T.L. The effects of soil environment on postmortem interval: a macroscopic analysis. J. Forensic Sci. 2009, 54:1217-1222.
72. Carter D.O., Tibbett M. Does repeated burial of skeletal muscle tissue (Ovis aries) in soil affect subsequent decomposition?. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2008, 40:529-535.