Odor analysis of decomposing buried human remains

Journal of Forensic Sciences

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 384-391

  Vass, Arpad A ^a   Smith, Rob R ^a   Thompson, Cyril V ^a   Burnett, Michael N ^a   Dulgerian, Nishan ^b   Eckenrode, Brian A ^b  

^a OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b Federal Bureau of Investigation   (United States)

Author keywords

Buried bodies; Clandestine graves; Forensic science; Human decomposition; Human remains detection canines; Odor analysis

Indexed keywords

AMMONIA; CARBON DIOXIDE; HYDROGEN; METHANE; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND;

ARTICLE; DECOMPOSITION; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MASS SPECTROMETRY; ODOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

BURIAL; FORENSIC ANTHROPOLOGY; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY-MASS SPECTROMETRY; HUMANS; ODORS; ORGANIC CHEMICALS; POSTMORTEM CHANGES; VOLATILIZATION;

EID: 41149179205     PISSN: 00221198     EISSN: 15564029     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00680.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Vass AA, Smith RR, Thompson CV, Burnett MN, Wolf DA, Synstelien JA, et al. Decompositional odor analysis database. J Forensic Sci 2004 49 (4 760 9.
2. Killam EW. The detection of human remains. Springfield IL : Charles C. Thomas, 1990.
3. Komar D. The use of cadaver dogs in locating scattered, scavenged human remains: preliminary field test results. J Forensic Sci 1999 44 (2 405 8.
4. O'block R, Doere S, True N. The benefits of canine squads. J Police Sci Admin 1979 7 (2 155 60.
5. Department of the Treasury. Law enforcement canine training. Washington : US Printing Office, 1993.
6. Chapman S. Police dogs in North America. Springfield, IL : Charles C. Thomas, 1990.
7. Hoving GL. Buried body search technology. Identification News 1986 2 : 3 15.
8. Kalmus H. The discrimination by the nose of the dog of individual human odours and in particular the odours of twins. Brit J Anim Behav 1955 3 (1 25 31.
9. Kristofeck W. A Study of attitudes, knowledge and utilization of canine teams by the Louisville Division of Police. Louisville, KY : University of Louisville, 1991.
10. Lilly J, Puckett M. Social control and dogs: a sociohistorical analysis. Crime Delinquency 1997 43 (2 123 47.
11. Pearsall M, Verbruggen H. Scent detection. New York : Barkleigh Productions, 1982.
12. Schall R. An evaluation of the animal-behavior theory for earthquake prediction. Calif Geol 1988 41 (2 16 21.
13. Syrotuck W. Scent and the scenting dog. New York : Barkleigh Productions, 1977.
14. Lorenzo N, Wan TL, Harper RJ, Hsu YL, Chow M, Rose S, et al. Laboratory and field experiments used to identify Canis lupus var. familiaris active odor signature chemicals from drugs, explosives, and humans. Anal Bioanal Chem 2003 376 : 1212 24.
15. Statheropoulos M, Spiliopoulos C, Agapiou A. A study of volatile organic compounds evolved from the decaying human body. Forensic Sci Int 2005 153 : 147 55.
16. Soil Survey Staff. Soil taxonomy, agriculture handbook no. 436, Chapter 4. Washington : US Printing Office, 1975.
17. Edwards R, Chaney B, Bergman M. Temperature developmental units for insects. Pest & Crop Newsletter 1987 2 : 5 6.
18. Vass AA, Bass WM, Wolt JD, Foss JE, Ammons JT. Time since death determinations of human cadavers using soil solution. J Forensic Sci 1992 37 (5 1236 53.
19. Clark MA, Worrell MB, Pless JE. Postmortem changes in soft tissue. In : Haglund WD, Sorg MH, editors. Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains. Boca Raton, FL : CRC Press, 1997 151 60.
20. Turner B, Wiltshire P. Experimental validation of forensic evidence: a study of the decomposition of buried pigs in a heavy clay soil. Forensic Sci Int 1999 101 : 113 22.
21. Vass AA. Beyond the grave - understanding human decomposition. Microbiology Today 2001 28 : 190 2.