Changes in episiotomy practice: Evidence-based medicine in action

Expert Review of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 301-309

  Lappen, Justin R ^a   Gossett, Dana R ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Episiotomy; Evidence based medicine; Incontinence; Pelvic floor; Perineal laceration; Pregnancy; Vaginal delivery

Indexed keywords

DISEASE SEVERITY; EPISIOTOMY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEAD INJURY; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; PELVIS INJURY; PERINEUM INJURY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROTECTION; REVIEW; SEXUAL FUNCTION; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

EID: 77952231720     PISSN: 17474108     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1586/eog.10.21     Document Type: Review

References (63)

1. Kilpatrick S, Garrison E. Normal labor and delivery. In: Obstetrics, Normal and Problem Pregnancies (5th Edition). Gabbe S (Ed.). Churchill Livingston Elsevier, PA, USA, 303-321 (2007).
2. Ould F. A Treatise on Midwifery in Three Parts. Nelson & Connor, Dublin, Ireland. (1742).
3. DeLee JB. The prophylactic forceps operation. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1, 34-44 (1920).
4. Thacker SB, Banta HD. Benefits and risks of episiotomy: an interpretive review of the English language literature, 1860-1980. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 38(6), 322-338 (1983).
5. Sleep J, Grant A, Garcia J, Elbourne D, Spencer J, Chalmers D. The West Berkshire perineal management trial. Br. Med. J. (Clin. Res. Ed.) 289(6445), 587-590 (1984). (Pubitemid 14009870)
6. Kaltreider DF, Dixon DM. A study of 710 complete lacerations following central episiotomy. South. Med. J. 41, 814-820 (1948).
7. Harrison RF, Brennan M, North PM, Reed JV, Wickam EA. Is routine episiotomy necessary? Br. Med. J. (Clin. Res. Ed.) 288(6435), 1971-1974 (1984). (Pubitemid 14081780)
8. Thorp JM, Bowes WA, Brame RG, Cefalo R. Selected use of midline episiotomy: effect on perineal trauma. Obstet. Gynecol. 70(2), 587-590 (1987). (Pubitemid 17099864)
9. Green JR, Soohoo SL. Factors associated with rectal injury in spontaneous deliveries. Obstet. Gynecol. 73(5), 732-738 (1989).
10. Shiono P, Klebanoff MA, Carey JC. Midline episiotomies: more harm than good? Obstet. Gynecol. 75(5), 765-770 (1990). (Pubitemid 20139154)
11. Anthony S, Buitendijk SE, Zondervan KT et al. Episiotomies and the occurrence of severe perineal lacerations. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 101, 1064-1067 (1994). (Pubitemid 24376868)
12. Labrecque M, Baillargeon L, Dallaire M, Tremblay A, Pinault J-J, Gingras S. Association between median episiotomy and severe perineal lacerations in primiparous women. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 156(6), 797-802 (1997). (Pubitemid 27145875)
13. Bodler-Adler B, Bodner K, Kaider A et al. Risk factors for third-degree perineal tears in vaginal delivery, with an analysis of episiotomy types. J. Reprod. Med. 46(8), 752-756 (2001). (Pubitemid 32802000)
14. Eason E, Labrecque M, Wells G, Feldman P. Preventing perineal trauma during childbirth: a systematic review. Obstet. Gynecol. 95(3), 464-471 (2000). (Pubitemid 30100520)
15. Argentine Episiotomy Trial Collaborative Group. Routine vs selective episiotomy: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 342, 1517-1518 (1993). (Pubitemid 23362169)
16. Baumann OM, Hammoud AO, McNeeley SG, DeRose E, Kudish B, Hendrix S. Factors associated with anal sphincter laceration in 40,923 primaparous women. Int. Urogynecol. J. 18, 985-990 (2007). (Pubitemid 350130399)
17. De Leeuw JW, Struijk PC, Vierhout ME, Wallenburg HCS. Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 108(4), 383-387 (2001).
18. Fenner DE, Genberg B, Brahma P, Marek L, DeLancey JO. Fecal and urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery with anal sphincter disruption in an obstetrics unit in the United States. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 189(6), 1543-1550 (2003). (Pubitemid 38056421)
19. Crawford LA, Quint EH, Pearl ML, DeLancey JL. Incontinence following rupture of the anal sphincter during delivery. Obstet. Gynecol. 82(4), 527-531 (1993). (Pubitemid 23278252)
20. Gainey HL. Postpartum observation of pelvic tissue damage: further studies. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 70, 800-807 (1955).
21. Fritel X, Schaal JP, Fauconnier A, Bertrand V, Levet C, Pigné A. Pelvic floor disorders 4 years after first delivery: a comparative study of restrictive versus systematic episiotomy. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 115(10), 247-252 (2008). (Pubitemid 350233605)
22. Mous M, Muller SA, de Leeuw JW. Long-term effects of anal sphincter rupture during vaginal delivery: faecal incontinence and sexual complaints. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 115(11), 234-238 (2008). (Pubitemid 350233598)
23. Sorensen SM, Bondeson H, Istre O, Vilmann P. Perineal rupture following vaginal delivery. Long-term consequences. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 67(4), 315-318 (1988). (Pubitemid 19190467)
24. Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJ, Strijers FL, Dekker GA, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen SG. Third-degree obstetric perineal tears: long term clinical and functional outcomes after primary repair. Br. J. Surg. 85(10), 1433-1438 (1998).
25. Sleep J, Grant A. West Berkshire perineal management trial: three year followup. Br. Med. J. (Clin. Res. Ed.) 295, 749-751 (1987). (Pubitemid 17132785)
26. Rockner G. Urinary incontinence after perineal trauma at childbirth. Scand. J. Caring Sci. 4, 169-172 (1990).
27. Klein MC, Gauthier JF, Robbins JM et al. Relationship of episiotomy to perineal trauma and morbidity, sexual dysfunction, and pelvic floor relaxation. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 171(3), 591-598 (1994).
28. Sartore A, De Seta F, Maso G, Pregazzi R, Grimaldi E, Guaschino S. The effects of mediolateral episiotomy on pelvic floor function after vaginal delivery. Obstet. Gynecol. 103(4), 669-673 (2004). (Pubitemid 40459026)
29. Ejegård H, Ryding EL, Sjögren B. Sexuality after delivery with episiotomy: a long-term follow-up. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 66, 1-7 (2008). (Pubitemid 352009121)
30. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Episiotomy. ACOG Practice Bulletin 71. Obstet. Gynecol. 107, 957-962 (2006).
31. Delancey J. Episiotomy: what's the angle? Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 103(1), 5-8 (2008).
32. Kearney R, Miller JM, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey J. Obstetric factors associated with levator ani muscle injury after vaginal birth. Obstet. Gynecol. 107(1), 144-149 (2006). (Pubitemid 43755516)
33. Gainey HL. Postpartum observation of pelvic tissue damage. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 45, 457-466 (1943).
34. Hartmann K, Viswanathan M, Palmieri R, Gartlehner G, Thorp J, Lohr KN. Outcomes of routine episiotomy: a systematic review. JAMA 293(17), 2141-2148 (2005). (Pubitemid 40617067)
35. Borghi J, Fox-Rushby J, Bergel E, Abalos E, Hutton G, Carroli G. The cost-effectiveness of routine versus restrictive episiotomy in Argentina. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 186(2), 221-228 (2002). (Pubitemid 34165437)
36. Carroli G, Mignini L. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 1, CD000081 (2009).
37. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health. Intrapartum Care: Care of Healthy Women and Their Babies During Childbirth. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Press, London, UK, 168-170 (2007).
38. Robinson JN, Norwitz ER, Cohen AP, Lieberman E. Predictors of episiotomy use at first vaginal delivery. Obstet. Gynecol. 96(2), 214-218 (2000). (Pubitemid 30447341)
39. Howden NL, Weber AM, Meyn LA. Episiotomy use among residents and faculty compared with private practitioners. Obstet. Gynecol. 103(1), 114-118 (2004).
40. Goode KT, Weiss PM, Koller C, Kimmel S, Hess LW. Episiotomy rates in private vs resident service deliveries: a comparison. J. Reprod. Med. 51(3), 190-192 (2006).
41. Gossett DR, Dunsmoor Su R. Episiotomy practice in a community hospital practice. J. Reprod. Med. 53(10), 803-808 (2008).
42. Webb DA, Culhane J. Time of day variation in rates of obstetric intervention to assist in vaginal delivery. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 56(8), 577-578 (2002). (Pubitemid 34791473)
43. Webb DA, Culhane J. Hospital variation in episiotomy use and the risk of perineal trauma during childbirth. Birth 29(2), 132-136 (2002). (Pubitemid 34526512)
44. Ruderman J, Carroll JC, Reid AJ, Murray MA. Are physicians changing the way they practice obstetrics? CMAJ 148(3), 409-415 (1993). (Pubitemid 23071594)
45. Klein MC, Kaczorowski J, Robbins JM, Gauthier RJ, Jorgensen SH, Joshi AK. Physicians beliefs and behaviour during a randomized controlled trial of episiotomy: consequences for the women in their care. CMAJ 153(6), 769-779 (1995).
46. Olatunbosun OA, Eduoard L, Pierson RA. Physicians attitudes toward evidence based obstetric practice: a questionnaire survey. Br. Med. J. 316, 365-366 (1998).
47. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 282(15), 1458-1465 (1999).
48. Grigoriadis T, Athanasiou S, Zisou A, Antsaklis A. Episiotomy and perineal repair practices among obstetricians in Greece. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 106(1), 27-29 (2009).
49. Macelod M, Murphy DJ. Operative vaginal delivery and the use of episiotomy-a survey of practice in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Eur. J. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 136, 178-183 (2008).
50. Robinson JN, Norwitz ER, Cohen AP, McElrath TF, Lieberman ES. Episiotomy, operative vaginal delivery, and significant perineal trauma in nulliparous women. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 181, 1180-1184 (1999).
51. Youssef R, Ramalingam U, Macleod M, Murphy DJ. Cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at instrumental vaginal delivery. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 112, 941-945 (2005). (Pubitemid 40896961)
52. Kudish B, Blackwell S, McNeeley SG et al. Operative vaginal delivery and midline episiotomy: a bad combination for the perineum. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 195, 749-754 (2006). (Pubitemid 44292144)
53. de Leeuw JW, de Wit C, Kuijken JPJA, Bruinse HW. Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 115, 104-108 (2008). (Pubitemid 350209613)
54. Murphy DJ, Macleod M, Bahl R, Goyder K, Howarth L, Strachan B. A randomized controlled trial of routine versus restrictive use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery: a multicenter pilot study. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 115, 1695-1703 (2008).
55. Macleod M, Strachan B, Bahl R et al. A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 115, 1688-1694 (2008).
56. Tincello DG, Williams A, Fowler GE, Adams EJ, Richmond DH, Alfirevic Z. Differences in episiotomy technique between midwives and doctors. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 110, 1041-1044 (2003). (Pubitemid 37510144)
57. Andrews V, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Jones PW. Are mediolateral episiotomies actually mediolateral? Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 112, 1156-1158 (2005). (Pubitemid 41632676)
58. Andrews V, Sultan AH, Thakar R, Jones PW. Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective study. Birth 33, 17-22 (2006). (Pubitemid 44448220)
59. Eogan M, Daly L, O'Connell PR, O'Herlihy C. Does the angle of episiotomy affect the incidence of anal sphincter injury? Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 113(2), 190-194 (2006).
60. Goffman D, Heo H, Pardanani S, Merkatz IR, Bernstein PS. Improving shoulder dystocia management among resident and attending physicians using simulations. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 199(3), 294.e1-5 (2008).
61. Fuchs KM, Miller RS, Berkowitz RL. Optimizing outcomes through protocols, multidisciplinary drills, and simulation. Semin. Perinatol. 33(2), 104-108 (2009).
62. Boonyasai RT, Windish DM, Chakraborti C, Feldman LS, Rubin HR, Bass EB. Effectiveness of teaching quality improvement to clinicians. JAMA 298(9), 1023-1037 (2007).
63. Eason E, Feldman P. Much ado about a little cut: is episiotomy worthwhile? Clinical commentary. Obstet. Gynecol. 95(4), 616-618 (2000).