Why can't Hong Kong forget the june 4th incident? Media, social organization, nation-state and collective memory

Mass Communication Research

Volumn , Issue 103, 2010, Pages 215-259

  Chan, Joseph M ^a   Lee, Francis L F ^a  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Collective memory; June 4th incident; Media; Nation state; Social organization

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952173923     PISSN: 10161007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Chinese source
2. Chinese source
3. Chinese source
4. Chinese source
5. Chinese source
6. Chinese source
7. Chinese source
8. Chinese source
9. Chinese source
10. Chinese source
11. Chinese source
12. Calhoun, C. (1994). Neither gods nor emperors: Students and the struggle for democracy in China. Berkeley: University of California Press.
13. Chan, J. M., & Lee, C. C. (1991). Mass media and political transition: The Hong Kong press in China's orbit. N.Y.: Guilford Press.
14. Chan, J. M., & Lee, F. L. F. (in press). The primacy of local interest and press freedom in Hong Kong: A survey study of journalists. Journalism.
15. Dayan, D., & Katz, E. (1992). Media events. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
16. Ferree, M. M., Gamson, W. A., Gerhards, J., & Rucht, D (2002). Shaping abortion discourse: Democracy and the public sphere in Germany and the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Foucault, M. (1977). Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews. In D. Bouchard & S. Simon (Eds.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
18. Fung, A. (2007). Political economy of Hong Kong media: Producing a hegemonic voice. Asian Journal of Communication, 17(2), 159-171.
19. Halbwachs, M. (1992). On collective memory (L. A. Coser, Trans, and Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1952).
20. He, Z., & Zhu, J. (1994). The "Voice of America" and China: Zeroing in on Tiananmen Square. Journalism Monographs, 143.
21. He, Z. (1996). Mass media and Tiananmen. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
22. Ho, W. (2007). Politics, cultures, and school curriculum: The struggles in Hong Kong. Discourse, 28(2), 139-157.
23. Hobsbawm, E., & Ranger, T. (Eds.) (1983). The invention of tradition. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
24. Kluver, A. R. (2002). The logic of new media in international affairs. New Media & Society, 4(4), 499-517.
25. Lee, C. C., & Chan, J. M. (1990). The Hong Kong press coverage of the Tiananmen protests. Gazette, 46, 175-195.
26. Lee, F. L. F. (2007a). Strategic interaction, cultural co-orientation, and press freedom in Hong Kong. Asian Journal of Communication, 17(2), 134-147.
27. Lee, F. L. F. (2007b). Objectivity as self-censorship? Hong Kong citizens' beliefs in media neutrality and perceptions of press freedom. Asian Survey, 47(3), 434-454.
28. Lee, F. L. F., & Chan, J. M. (2005). Political attitudes, participation, and Hong Kong identities after 1997. Issues & Studies, 41(2), 1-35.
29. Lee, F. L. F., & Chan, J. M. (2009). The organizational production of self-censorship in the Hong Kong media. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 14, 112-133.
30. Lee, C. C., & Yang, J. H. (1995). Foreign news and national interest: Comparing U.S. and Japanese coverage of a Chinese student movement. Gazette, 56, 1-18.
31. Marchetti, G. (2006). From Tian 'anmen to Times Square: Transnational China and the Chinese diaspora on global screens, 1989-1997. Temple University Press.
32. Mathews, G., Ma, E., & Lui, T. (2008). Hong Kong, China: Learning to belong to a nation London: Routledge.
33. Misztal, B. (2003). Theories of social remembering. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
34. Schudson, M. (1992). Watergate in American Memory. New York: Basic Books.
35. Schudson, M. (1995). Dynamics of distortion in collective memory. In Schacter, D. L. (Ed.), Memory distortion: How minds, brains, and societies reconstruct the past (pp. 346-364). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36. Schudson, M. (1997). Lives, laws and language: Commemorative vs. non-commemorative forms of effective public memory. The Communication Review, 2(1), 3-17.
37. Schwartz, B. (1991). Iconography and collective memory: Lincoln's image in the American mind. Sociological Quarterly, 32, 301-319.
38. Schuman, H., & Scott, J. (1989). Generations and collective memories. American Sociological Review, 54(June), 359-381.
39. So, A. (1999). Hong Kong's embattled democracy. New York: John Hopkins University Press.
40. So, C., & Chan, J. M. (2007). Professionalism, politics and market force: Survey studies of Hong Kong journalists 1996-2006. Asian Journal of Communication, 17(2), 148-158.
41. Wang, S. J. (1992). Factors influencing cross-national news treatment of a critical national event. Gazette, 49, 193-214.
42. Wasserstrom, J. N. (2003). Current Chinese protests and the prism of Tiananmen. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politic, 8, 81-86.
43. Zelizer, B. (1992). Covering the body: The Kennedy assassination, the media, and the shaping of collective memory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44. Zerubavel, E. (1981). Hidden rhythms: Schedules and calendars in sociall Life. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
45. Zerubavel, E. (1996). Social memories: Steps to a sociology of the past. Qualitative Sociology, 19(3), 283-299.
46. Zhao, D. (2001). The power of Tiananmen: State-society relations and the 1989 Beijing student movement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.