Constructing proximity: Relating to readers in popular and professional science

Journal of English for Academic Purposes

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 116-127

  Hyland, Ken ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

academic writing; interaction; popular science; research articles

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952106436     PISSN: 14751585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Becher T., and Trowler P. Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual inquiry and the cultures of disciplines (2001), SRHE and Open University Press, Milton Keynes
2. Berkenkotter C., and Huckin T. Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication (1995), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
3. In: Casanave C., and Vandrick S. (Eds). Writing for scholarly publication (2003), Lawrence Earlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
4. Hoey M. Textual interaction (2001), Routledge, London
5. Hyland K. Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing (2004), University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI
6. Hyland K. Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies 6 2 (2005) 173-191
7. Hyland K. Academic discourse (2009), Continuum, London
8. Kaufer D., and Geisler C. Novelty in academic writing. Written Communication 6 3 (1989) 286-311
9. Martin J., and White P. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English (2005), Palgrave/MacMillan, London
10. Miller T. Visual persuasion: a comparison of visuals in academic texts and the popular press. English for Specific Purposes 17 1 (1998) 29-46
11. Montgomery S. The scientific voice (1996), The Guildford Press, New York
12. Myers G. Writing biology: Texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge (1990), University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI
13. Myers G. Lexical cohesion and specialized knowledge in science and popular science texts. Discourse Processes 14 1 (1991) 1-26
14. Nwogu K. Structure of science popularizations: a genre analysis approach to the schema of popularized medical texts. English for Specific Purposes 10 (1991) 111-123
15. Pellechia M. Trends in science coverage: a content analysis of three US newspapers. Public Understanding of Science 6 (1997) 49-68
16. Sacks H., Schlegloff E., and Jefferson G. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language 50 (1974) 697-735
17. Swales J. Research genres (2004), CUP, Cambridge