Ovarian stimulation retards postimplantation development and alters global gene expression profile of blastocysts in mouse

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 93, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 2770-2773

  Zhang, Xinyan ^a,b   Wang, Li ^b   Li, Xiuli ^a   Li, Ke ^b   Fang, Jing ^b   Yao, Yuanqing ^a  

^a CHINESE PLA GENERAL HOSPITAL   (China)

^b PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR CONTAINING FIBULIN; GENE PRODUCT; GONADOTROPIN; HISTOCOMPATIBILY 2 K1; NUCLEAR FACTOR; NUCLEAR FACTOR OF KAPPA LIGHT POLYPEPTIDE; RETICULOCALBIN 1; RETICULOCALBIN 2; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR FOXC1; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BLASTOCYST; CELL COUNT; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EXPERIMENTAL MOUSE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FETUS MORTALITY; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE FUNCTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GROWTH RETARDATION; HUMAN; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; NIDATION; OVARY HYPERSTIMULATION; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL;

ANIMALS; BLASTOCYST; EMBRYO IMPLANTATION; EMBRYO, MAMMALIAN; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; MICE; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; OVULATION INDUCTION;

EID: 77952105262     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.03.018     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Jones Jr. H.W., Jones G.S., Andrews M.C., Acosta A., Bundren C., Garcia J., et al. The program for in vitro fertilization at Norfolk. Fertil Steril 38 (1982) 14-21
2. Schieve L.A. The promise of single-embryo transfer. N Engl J Med 354 (2006) 1190-1193
3. Nikas G., Develioglu O.H., Toner J.P., and Jones Jr. H.W. Endometrial pinopodes indicate a shift in the window of receptivity in IVF cycles. Hum Reprod 14 (1999) 787-792
4. Basir G.S., O W., Ng E.H., and Ho P.C. Morphometric analysis of peri-implantation endometrium in patients having excessively high oestradiol concentrations after ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod 16 (2001) 435-440
5. Fossum G.T., Davidson A., and Paulson R.J. Ovarian hyperstimulation inhibits embryo implantation in the mouse. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf 6 (1989) 7-10
6. Ertzeid G., and Storeng R. The impact of ovarian stimulation on implantation and fetal development in mice. Hum Reprod 16 (2001) 221-225
7. Ziebe S., Bangsboll S., Schmidt K.L., Loft A., Lindhard A., and Nyboe Andersen A. Embryo quality in natural versus stimulated IVF cycles. Hum Reprod 19 (2004) 1457-1460
8. Nikas G., Develioglu O.H., Toner J.P., and Jones Jr. H.W. Endometrial pinopodes indicate a shift in the window of receptivity in IVF cycles. Hum Reprod 14 3 (1999) 787-792
9. Dokras A., Sargent I.L., and Barlow D.H. Human blastocyst grading: an indicator of developmental potential?. Hum Reprod 8 (1993) 2119-2127
10. Ebert K.M., Hammer R.E., and Papaioannou V.E. A simple method for counting nuclei in the preimplantation mouse embryo. Experientia 41 (1985) 1207-1209
11. Zeng G.Q., and Cao Y.J. Co-culture of mouse embryos with monolayer of uterine epithelial cells. Acta Zoologica Sinica 42 (1996) 212-217
12. Livak K.J. ST Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCt method. Methods 25 (2001) 402-408
13. Nguyen D.V., and Rocke D.M. Tumor classification by partial least squares using microarray gene expression data. Bioinformatics 18 (2002) 39-50