Embryo quality in natural versus stimulated IVF cycles

Human Reproduction

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1457-1460

  Ziebe, S ^a   Bangsboll S ^a   Schmidt, K L T ^a   Loft, A ^a   Lindhard, A ^a   Andersen, A Nyboe ^a  

^a Rigshospitalet   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Developmental potential; Embryo quality; Impact of gonadotrophins; In vitro; In vivo

Indexed keywords

BUSERELIN; CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN; GONADORELIN AGONIST; GONADOTROPIN; RECOMBINANT FOLLITROPIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; CELL DIVISION; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYOPRESERVATION; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; EMBRYO; EMBRYO CULTURE; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FEMALE INFERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MENSTRUAL CYCLE; OOCYTE; OVARY FOLLICLE; OVULATION; OVULATION INDUCTION; QUALITY CONTROL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; THAWING;

EID: 3042681610     PISSN: 02681161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh264     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aboulghar MA, Mansour RT Serour GI, Ramzy AM and Amin YM (1997) Oocytes quality in patients with severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril 68,1017-1021.
2. Akagbosu A, Marcus S, Abusheikha N, Avery S and Brinsden P (1998) Does ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome affect the quality of oocytes. Hum Reprod 13,2583-2584.
3. Claman P, Armant DR, Seibel MM, Wang T-A, Oskowitz SP and Taymor ML (1987) The impact of preembryo quality and quantity on implantation and the establishment of viable pregnancies. J In Vitro Fertil Preembryo Transfer 4,218-222.
4. Claman P, Domingo M, Garner P et al (1993) Natural cycle in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer at the University of Ottawa: an inefficient therapy for tubal infertility. Fertil Steril 60,298-302.
5. Cummins JM, Breen TM, Harison KL, Shaw JM, Wilson LM and Hennessey JF (1986) A formula for scoring human preembryo growth rates in in vitro fertilization: its value in predicting pregnancy and in comparison with visual estimates of preembryo quality. J In Vitro Fertil Preembryo Transfer 3,284-295.
6. Ertzeid G and Storeng R (1992) The impact of ovarian stimulation on implantation and fetal development in mice. Hum Reprod 16,221-225.
7. Giorgetti C, Terriou P, Auquier P, Hans E, Spach J-L, Salzmann J and Roulier R (1995) Preembryo score to predict implantation after in-vitro fertilization: based on 957 single preembryo transfers. Hum Reprod 10,2427-2431.
8. Hardarson T, Hanson C, Sjögren A and Lundin K (2001) Human preembryos with unevenly sized blastomeres have lower pregnancy and implantation rates: indication for aneuploidy and multinucleation. Hum Reprod 16,313-318.
9. Ingerslev HJ, Højgaard A, Hindkjær J and Kesmodel U (2001) A randomized study comparing IVF in the unstimulated cycle with IVF following clomiphene citrate. Hum Reprod 16,696-702.
10. Johansson M, Hardarson T and Lundin K (2003) There is a cutoff limit in diameter between a blastomere and a small anucleate fragment. J Assist Reprod Genet 20,309-313.
11. Kaneko T, Saito H, Takahashi T, Ohta N, Saito T and Hiroi M (2000) Effect of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation on oocyte quality in terms of the incedence of apoptotic granulosa cells. J Assist Reprod Genet 17,580-585.
12. Kim SH, Kim CH, Suh CS, Moon SY, Lee JY and Chang YS (1996) Simultaneous program of natural-cycle in vitro fertilization and cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet 13,716-721.
13. Levy MJ, Gindoff P, Hall J and Stillman RJ (1991) The efficacy of natural versus stimulated cycle IVF-ET. Fertil Steril 56(Suppl),S15-16.
14. Lindheim SR, Vidali A, Ditkoff E and Sauer MV (1997) Poor responders to ovarian hyperstimulation may benefit from an attempt at natural-cycle oocyte retrieval. J Assist Reprod Genet 14,174-176.
15. MacDougall MJ, Tan SL, Hall V et al (1994) Comparison of natural with clomiphene citrate-stimulated cycles in in vitro fertilization: a prospective, randomized trial. Fertil Steril 61,1052-1057.
16. Ng EHY, Chui DKC, Tang OS et al (2001) In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer during natural cycles. J Reprod Med 46,95-99.
17. Ng EHY, Lau EYL, Yeung WSB and Ho PC (2003) Oocyte and embryo quality in patients with excessive ovarian response during in vitro fertilization treatment. J Assist Reprod Genet 20,186-191.
18. Paulson RJ, Sauer MV, Francis MM et al (1992) In vitro fertilization in unstimulated cycles: the University of Southern California experience. Fertil Steril 57,290-293.
19. Pelinck MJ, Hoek A, Simons AHM and Heineman MJ (2002) Efficacy of natural cycle IVF: a review of the literature. Hum Reprod Update 2,129-139.
20. Puissant F, Van Rysselberge M, Barlow P, Deweze J and Leroy F (1987) Preembryo scoring as a prognostic tool in IVF treatment. Hum Reprod 2,705-708.
21. Shulman A, Ben-Nun I, Ghetler Y, Kaneti H, Shilon M and Beyth Y (1993) Relationship between preembryo morphology and implantation rate after in vitro fertilization treatment in conception cycles. Fertil Steril 60,123-126.
22. Staessen C, Van den Abbeel E, Carlé M, Khan I, Devroey P and Van Steirteghem AC (1990) Comparison between human serum and Albuminar-20™ supplement for in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 5,336-341.
23. Staessen C, Camus M, Bollen N, Devroey P and Van Steirteghem AC (1992) The relationship between preembryo quality and the occurrence of multiple pregnancies. Fertil Steril 57,626-630.
24. Steer CV, Mills CL, Tan SL, Campbell S and Edwards RG (1992) The cumulative embryo score: a predictive embryo scoring technique to select the optimal number of embryos to transfer in an in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer programme. Hum Reprod 7,117-119.
25. Svalander P, Green B, Haglund K et al (1991) Natural versus stimulated cycles in IVF-ET treatment for tubal factor infertility. Hum Reprod 6(Suppl 1),101-102.
26. VanBlerkom J and Davis P (2001) Differential effects of repeated ovarian stimulation on cytoplasmic and spindle organization in metaphase II mouse oocytes matured in vivo and in vitro. Hum Reprod 16,757-764.
27. VanRoyen E, Mangelschots K, De Neubourg D, Laureys I, Ryckaert G and Gerris J (2001) Calculating the implantation potential of day 3 embryos in women younger than 38 years of age: a new model. Hum Reprod 16,326-332.
28. Ziebe S, Petersen K, Lindenberg L, Andersen A-G, Gabrielsen A and Nyboe Andersen A (1997) Embryo morphology or cleavage stages: how to select the best embryos for transfer after in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 12,1545-1549.
29. Ziebe S, Bech B, Petersen K, Mikkelsen AL, Gabrielsen A and Nyboe Andersen A (1998) Resumption of mitosis during post-thaw culture: a key parameter in selecting the right embryos for transfer. Hum Reprod 13,178-181.
30. Ziebe S, Lundin K, Loft A, Bergh C, Nyboe Andersen A, Selleskog U, Grøndahl C and Arce J-A (2003) Embryo morphology and total chromosomal constitution for chromosome 3, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y after 3 days of culture of 144 randomly selected donated human oocytes. Hum Reprod 18,2575-2581.