Utility of vaginal and rectal contrast medium in MRI for the detection of deep pelvic endometriosis

European Radiology

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1003-1010

  Chassang, M ^a   Novellas, S ^a   Bloch Marcotte, C ^a   Delotte, J ^a   Toullalan, O ^b   Bongain, A ^a   Chevallier, P ^a  

^a CENTRE HOSPITALIER UNIVERSITAIRE DE NICE   (France)

^b Centre Hospitalier de Cannes   (France)

Author keywords

Contrast media; Endometriosis; MRI; Rectum; Vaginal

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENDOMETRIOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFERTILITY; LAPAROSCOPY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PELVIS PAIN SYNDROME; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONTRAST MEDIA; ENDOMETRIOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; PELVIS; RECTUM; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VAGINA; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77952096947     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1627-8     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. PR Koninckx C Meuleman S Demeyere E Lesaffre FJ Cornillie 1991 Suggestive evidence that pelvic endometriosis is a progressive disease, whereas deeply infiltrating endometriosis is associated with pelvic pain Fertil Steril 55 759 765 1:STN:280:DyaK3M7osVCluw%3D%3D 2010001
2. C Chapron A Fauconnier M Vieira, et al. 2003 Anatomical distribution of deeply infiltrating endometriosis: surgical implications and proposition for a classification Hum Reprod 18 157 161 10.1093/humrep/deg009 12525459 (Pubitemid 36138869)
3. ML Kataoka K Togashi T Yamaoka, et al. 2005 Posterior cul-de-sac obliteration associated with endometriosis: MR imaging evaluation Radiology 234 815 823 10.1148/radiol.2343031366 15665220 (Pubitemid 40250825)
4. J Ford J English WA Miles T Giannopoulos 2004 Pain, quality of life and complications following the radical resection of rectovaginal endometriosis BJOG 111 353 356 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00093.x 15008772 (Pubitemid 38446112)
5. J Hollett-Caines GA Vilos DA Penava 2003 Laparoscopic mobilization of the rectosigmoid and excision of the obliterated cul-de-sac J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 10 190 194 10.1016/S1074-3804(05)60297-6 12732770 (Pubitemid 37082530)
6. JA Abbott J Hawe RD Clayton R Garry 2003 The effects and effectiveness of laparoscopic excision of endometriosis: a prospective study with 2-5 year follow-up Hum Reprod 18 1922 1927 10.1093/humrep/deg275 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3svksl2msA%3D%3D 12923150 (Pubitemid 37107569)
7. DB Redwine JT Wright 2001 Laparoscopic treatment of complete obliteration of the cul-de-sac associated with endometriosis: long-term follow-up of en bloc resection Fertil Steril 76 358 365 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)01913-6 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvivFCltg%3D%3D 11476786 (Pubitemid 32703827)
8. N Chopin M Vieira B Borghese, et al. 2005 Operative management of deeply infiltrating endometriosis: results on pelvic pain symptoms according to a surgical classification J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12 106 112 10.1016/j.jmig.2005. 01.015 15904612 (Pubitemid 40800363)
9. R Zanardi C Del Frate C Zuiani M Bazzocchi 2003 Staging of pelvic endometriosis based on MRI findings versus laparoscopic classification according to the American Fertility Society Abdom Imaging 28 733 742 10.1007/s00261-003- 0005-2 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3srkvFChug%3D%3D 14628887 (Pubitemid 37040185)
10. C Roy C Balzan V Thoma B Sauer A Wattiez J Leroy 2009 Efficiency of MR imaging to orientate surgical treatment of posterior deep pelvic endometriosis Abdom Imaging 34 251 259 10.1007/s00261-008-9367-9 18235982
11. K Kinkel KA Frei C Balleyguier C Chapron 2006 Diagnosis of endometriosis with imaging: a review Eur Radiol 16 285 298 10.1007/s00330-005-2882-y 16155722 (Pubitemid 43149627)
12. C Del Frate R Girometti M Pittino G Del Frate M Bazzocchi C Zuiani 2006 Deep retroperitoneal pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging appearance with laparoscopic correlation Radiographics 26 1705 1718 10.1148/rg.266065048 17102045
13. M Bazot E Darai R Hourani, et al. 2004 Deep pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging for diagnosis and prediction of extension of disease Radiology 232 379 389 10.1148/radiol.2322030762 15205479 (Pubitemid 38971276)
14. C Jarlot E Anglade N Paillocher D Moreau L Catala C Aubé 2008 MR imaging features of deep pelvic endometriosis: correlation with laparoscopy J Radiol 89 1745 1754 10.1016/S0221-0363(08)74479-2 1:STN:280: DC%2BD1M%2FksFWhsQ%3D%3D 19106831
15. HK Ha YT Lim HS Kim TS Suh HH Song SJ Kim 1994 Diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis: fat-suppressed T1-weighted vs conventional MR images Am J Roentgenol 163 127 131 1:STN:280:DyaK2c3nvFGmtg%3D%3D
16. L Mondot S Novellas M Senni, et al. 2006 Pelvic prolapse: static and dynamic MRI Abdom Imaging 32 775 783 10.1007/s00261-006-9168-y
17. D Akata U Kerimoglu T Hazirolan, et al. 2005 Efficacy of transvaginal contrast-enhanced MRI in the early staging of cervical carcinoma Eur Radiol 15 1727 1733 10.1007/s00330-005-2645-9 16034642 (Pubitemid 41102371)
18. L Van Hoe D Vanbeckevoort R Oyen U Itzlinger I Vergote 1999 Cervical carcinoma: optimized local staging with intravaginal contrast-enhanced MR imaging-preliminary results Radiology 213 608 611 10551250
19. M Urban HR Rosen N Hölbling, et al. 2000 MR imaging for the preoperative planning of sphincter-saving surgery for tumors of the lower third of the rectum: use of intravenous and endorectal contrast materials Radiology 214 503 508 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7jvVKlug%3D%3D 10671600
20. E van Leeuwen 1990 Between scientific application and therapy: the ethical consideration Dev Biol Stand 71 161 170 2205524
21. MA Brown RF Mattrey S Stamato 2005 MRI of the female pelvis using vaginal gel AJR 185 1221 1227 10.2214/AJR.04.1660 16247138
22. H Takeuchi R Kuwatsuru M Kitade, et al. 2005 A novel technique using magnetic resonance imaging jelly for evaluation of rectovaginal endometriosis Fertil Steril 83 442 447 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.08.021 15705388 (Pubitemid 40221802)
23. I Kikuchi H Takeuchi R Kuwatsuru, et al. 2009 Diagnosis of complete cul-de-sac obliteration (CCDSO) by the MRI jelly method J Magn Reson Imaging 29 365 370 10.1002/jmri.21618 19161189
24. M Bazot J Nassar E Daraï, et al. 2005 Value of sonography and MR imaging for the evaluation of deep pelvic endometriosis J Radiol 86 461 467 10.1016/S0221-0363(05)81390-3 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MvkslGntA%3D%3D 16114201 (Pubitemid 40805776)
25. MS Abrao MO Gonçalves JA Dias Jr S Podgaec LP Chamie R Blasbalg 2007 Comparison between clinical examination, transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of deep endometriosis Hum Reprod 22 3092 3097 10.1093/humrep/dem187 17947378 (Pubitemid 351696760)
26. C Chapron JB Dubuisson V Pansini, et al. 2002 Routine clinical examination is not sufficient for diagnosing and locating deeply infiltrating endometriosis J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 9 115 119 10.1016/S1074-3804(05)60117- X 11960033 (Pubitemid 34457068)
27. M Bazot I Thomassin R Hourani A Cortez E Darai 2004 Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography for deep pelvic endometriosis Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 24 180 185 10.1002/uog.1108 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2czotleqsA%3D%3D 15287057 (Pubitemid 39061844)