Identification of beer gushing caused by microbial infection of Schooner barley

Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists

Volumn 68, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 96-100

  Wang, Jin ^a   Zhao, Shujuan ^a   Jiang, Xiaolei ^a   Shi, Dianyu ^b   Shi, Weichen ^c   Zhao, Changxin ^a  

^a DALIAN POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Beijing Engineering Laboratory for Geriatric Nutrition Food Research   (China)

^c China Fermentation Industry Association (CFIA)   (China)

Author keywords

Beer gushing; Fusarium poae; Isolation and purification; Protein; Schooner barley

Indexed keywords

FUNGI; FUSARIUM; FUSARIUM POAE; HORDEUM;

EID: 77952066971     PISSN: 03610470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1094/asbcj-2010-0308-01     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Abildgren, M. P., Lund, F., Thrane, U., and Elmholt, S. Czapek-Dox agar containing iprodione and dicloran as a selective medium for the isolation of Fusarium species. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 5:83-86, 1987.
2. Amaha, M., and Kitabatake, K. Gushing in beer. In: Brewing Science, vol. 2. J. R. A. Pollock, ed. Academic Press, London. Pp. 457-489, 1981.
3. Andrews, S., and J. I. Pitt. Selective medium for isolation of Fusarium species and dematiaceous hyphomycetes from cereals. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 51:1235-1238, 1986.
4. Bradford, M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of proteindye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72:248-254, 1976.
5. Casey, G. P. Primary versus secondary gushing and assay procedures used to assess malt/beer gushing potential. Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. 33:229-235, 1996.
6. Draeger, M. Physical observations on the subject of gushing. Brauwelt Int. 4:363-367, 1996.
7. Gjertsen, P. Gushing in beer: Its nature, cause and prevention. Brew. Dig. 42:80-84, 1967.
8. Gjertsen, P., Trolle, B., and Andersen, K. Studies on gushing. II. Gushing caused by micro-organisms specially Fusarium species. Proc. Congr. Eur. Brew. Conv. 10:428-438, 1965.
9. Haikara, A. Gushing induced by fungi. In: Eur. Brew. Conv. Monogr. VI, Helsinki. Brauwelt-Verlag, Nürnberg, Germany. Pp. 251-259, 1980.
10. Haikara, A. Malt and beer from barley artificially contaminated with Fusarium in the field. In: Proc. Congr. Eur. Brew. Conv. 19:401-408, 1983.
11. Haikara, A., Sarlin, T., Nakari-Setälä, T., and Penttilä, M. Method for determining a gushing factor for a beverage. Patent EP 1071949, 2000.
12. Kitabatake, K., Fukushima, S., Kawasaki, I., and Amaha, M. Gushinginducing peptides in beer produced by Penicillium chrysogenum. In: Pep - tide Chemistry. H. Yonehara, ed. Protein Research Foundation, Osaka, Japan. Pp. 7-12, 1979.
13. Kleemola, T., Nakari-Setälä, T., Linder, M., Penttilä, M., Kotaviita, E., Olkku, J., and Haikara, A. Characterisation and detection of the gushing factors produced by fungi. Proc. Congr. Eur. Brew. Conv. 28:129-138, 2001.
14. Laemmli, U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680-685, 1970.
15. Lesse, A. J., Campagnari, A. A., Bittner, W. E., and Apicella, M. A. Increased resolution of lipopolysaccharides and lipooligosaccharides utilizing tricine-sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. J. Immunol. Methods 126:109-117, 1990.
16. Munar, M. J., and Sebree, B. Gushing: A maltster's view. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 55:119-122, 1997.
17. Pellaud, J. Gushing: State of the art. Jean de Clerck Chair X, Leuven, Belgium, 2002.
18. Prentice, N., and Sloey, W. Studies on barley microflora of possible importance to malting and brewing quality. Proc. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 1960, pp. 28-34.
19. Sarlin, T., Laitila, A., Pekkarinen, A., and Haikara, A. Differences between the effects of three Fusarium species on the quality of barley and malt. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 63:43-49, 2005.
20. Sarlin, T., Nakari-Setälä, T., Linder, M., Penttilä, M., and Haikara, A. Fungal hydrophobins as predictors of the gushing activity of malt. J. Inst. Brew. 111:105-111, 2005.
21. Schägger, H., and von Jagow, G. Tricine-sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for the separation of proteins in the range from 1 to 100 kDa. Anal. Biochem. 166:368-379, 1987.
22. Schwarz, P., Beattie, S., and Casper, H. Relationship between Fusarium infestation of barley and the gushing potential of malt. J. Inst. Brew. 102:93-96, 1996.
23. Schwarz, P. B., Casper, H. H., and Beattie, S. Fate and development of naturally occurring Fusarium mycotoxins during malting and brewing. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 53:121-127, 1995.
24. Thrane, U. Comparison of three selective media for detecting Fusarium species in foods: A collaborative study. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 29:149-156, 1996.
25. Vaag, P., Riis, P., Knudsen, A. D., Pedersen, S., and Meiling, E. A simple and rapid test for gushing tendency in brewing materials. Proc. Congr. Eur. Brew. Conv. 24:155-162, 1993.
26. Wessels, J. G. H. Developmental regulation of fungal cell wall formation. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 32:413-437, 1994.
27. Wessels, J. G. H. Fungal hydrophobins: Proteins that function at an interface. Trends Plant Sci. 1:9-15, 1996.
28. Wösten, H. A. B., de Vries, O. M. H., and Wessels, J. G. H. Interfacial self-assembly of fungal hydrophobin into a hydrophobic rootlet layer. Plant Cell 5:1567-1574, 1993.
29. Wösten, H. A. B., and Wessels, J. G. H. Hydrophobins, from molecular structure to multiple functions in fungal development. Mycoscience 38:363-374, 1997.