Pulsed electromagnetic fields accelerate wound healing in the skin of diabetic rats

Bioelectromagnetics

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 318-323

  Goudarzi, Iran ^a,b   Hajizadeh, Sohrab ^a   Salmani, Mahmoud E ^b   Abrari, Kataneh ^b  

^a TARBIAT MODARES UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b DAMGHAN UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Diabetes; Pulsed electromagnetic field; Rat; Streptozocin; Wound healing

Indexed keywords

ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; TENSILE STRENGTH;

CONTROL GROUPS; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIABETIC RATS; EXPOSED TO; EXTREMELY LOW FREQUENCIES; PULSED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; STERILE SALINE; STREPTOZOCIN; WISTAR RAT; WOUND HEALING;

RATS;

ANIMALIA; RATTUS; RATTUS NORVEGICUS;

STREPTOZOCIN;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; EXPERIMENTAL DIABETES MELLITUS; INJURY; MALE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RAT; SKIN; TENSILE STRENGTH; WISTAR RAT; WOUND HEALING;

ANIMALS; DIABETES MELLITUS, EXPERIMENTAL; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; MALE; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; SKIN; STREPTOZOCIN; TENSILE STRENGTH; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 77952055673     PISSN: 01978462     EISSN: 1521186X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bem.20567     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aaron RK, Ciombor DM, Simon BG. 2004. Treatment of nonunions with electric and electromagnetic fields. Clin Orthop Relat Res 419: 21-29.
2. Agren MS, Engle MA, Mertz PM. 1994. Collagenase during burn wound healing: Influence of a hydrogel dressing and pulsed electrical stimulation. Plast Reconstr Surg 94: 518-524.
3. Athanasiou A, Karkambounas S, Batistatou A, Lykoudis E, Katsaraki A, Kartsiouni T, Papalois A, Evangelou A. 2007. The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on secondary skin wound healing: An experimental study. Bioelectromagnetics 28 (5) : 362-368.
4. Barker AT, Jaffe LF, Vanable JW. 1982. The glabrous epidermis of cavies contains a powerful battery. Am J Physiol 242: 358-366.
5. Bassett CA. 1993. Beneficial effects of electromagnetic fields. J Cell Biochem 51 (4) : 387-393.
6. Beer HD, Longaker MT, Werner S. 1997. Reduced expression of PDGF and PDGF receptors during impaired wound healing. J Invest Dermatol 109: 132.
7. Bouzarjomehri F, Hajizadeh S, Sharafati AA, Firoozabadi SMP. 2000. Effects of Low frequency pulsed electromagnetic fiels on wound healing in rat skin. Arch Intern Med 3: 23-27.
8. Brownlee M. 1992. Glycation products and the pathogenesis of diabetic complication. Diabetes Care 15: 1835-1843.
9. Callaghan MJ, Chang EI, Seiser N, Aarabi S, Ghali S, Kinnucan ER, Simon BJ, Gurtner GC. 2008. Pulsed electromagnetic fields accelerate normal and diabetic wound healing by increasing endogenous FGF-2 release. Plast Reconstr Surg 121 (1) : 130-141.
10. Candela S, Hernandez RE, Gagliardino JJ. 1979. Circadian variation of the streptozotocin diabetogenic effect in mice. Experientia 35: 1256.
11. Elias D, Prigozin H, Polak N, Rapoport M, Lohse AW, Cohen IR. 1994. Autoimmune diabetes induced by the beta-cell toxin STZ. Immunity to the 60-kDa heat shock protein and to insulin. Diabetes 43: 992.
12. Fahey TJ, Sadaty A, Jones WG, Barber A, Smoller B, Shires GT. 1991. Diabetes impairs the late inflammatory response to wound healing. J Surg Res 50: 308-313.
13. Goodman R, Henderson AS. 1986. Some biological effects of electromagnetic fields. Biochem Bioenerg 15: 39-55.
14. Goodson WH, Hunt TK. 1977. Studies in wound healing in experimental diabetes. J Surg Res 22: 221-227.
15. Goodson WH, Hunt TK. 1979. Wound healing and the diabetic patient. Surg Gynecol Obstet 149: 600-608.
16. Hajduch E, Darakhshan F, Hundal HS. 1998. Glucose uptake in rat adipocytes: Glu5 expression and the effects of streptozotocin-induced diabetes. Diabetologia 41: 821-828.
17. Hehenberger K, Hansson A, Heilborn JD, Abdel-Halim SM, Ostensson CG, Brismar K. 1998. Inhibited proliferation of fibroblasts derived from chronic diabetic wounds and normal dermal fibroblasts treated with high glucose is associated with increased formation of l-lactate. Wound Repair Regen 6: 135.
18. Hoogwerf BJ. 2001. Postoperative management of the diabetic patient. Med Clin North Am 85: 1213.
19. Johnson DJ, Hentz VR. 1987. Electromagnetic field enhancement of rat wound tensile strength and pedicle skin flap survival. Trans BRAGS 7: 78-83.
20. Katsir G, Baram SC, Parola AH. 1998. Effect of sinusoidally varying magnetic fields on cell proliferation and adenosine deaminase specific activity. Bioelectromagnetics 19: 46-52.
21. Leigh IH, Bennett G. 1994. Pressure ulcers: Prevalence, etiology, and treatment modalities. A review. Am J Surg 167 (1A Suppl) : 25S-30S.
22. Lundeberg TCM, Eriksson CV, Malm M. 1992. Electrical nerve stimulation improves healing of diabetic ulcers. Ann Plast Surg 29: 328-331.
23. Macias MY, Battocletti JH, Sutton CH, Pintar FA, Maiman DJ. 2000. Directed and enhanced neurite growth with pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation. Bioelectromagnetics 21 (4) : 272-286.
24. Marhoffer W, Stein M, Maeser E, Federlin K. 1992. Impairment of polymorphonuclear leukocyte function and metabolic control of diabetes. Diabetes Care 15: 256.
25. Mikulies MH, Esterhai JL, Black J. 1986. Faradic stimulation produces an increase in ultimate tensile strength in surgically induced full thickness skin incisions. Trans BRAGS 6: 73-75.
26. Mulder G. 1991. Treatment of open skin wounds with electric stimulation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 72: 375-377.
27. Murray JC, Farndale RW. 1985. Modulation of collagen production in cultured fibroblasts by a low frequency pulsed magnetic fields. Biochim Biophys Acta 838: 95-105.
28. Patino O, Grana D, Bolgiani A, Prezzavento G, Mino J, Merlo A, Benaim F. 1996. Pulsed electromagnetic fields in experimental cutaneous wound healinginrats. J Burn Care Rehabil 17: 528-531.
29. Phillips T, Stanton B, Provan A, Lew R. 1994. A study of the impact of leg ulcers on quality of life: Financial, social, and psychological implications. J Am Acad Dermatol 31: 49-53.
30. Prakash K, Pundit P, Sharman KL. 1974. Studies in wound healing in experimental diabetes. Int Surg 59: 25-28.
31. Rees DA, Alcolado JC. 2005. Animal models of diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med 22: 359.
32. Reich JD, Tarjan PP. 1990. Electrical stimulation and skin: A review. Int J Dermatol 29: 395-400.
33. Robotti E, Zimbler AG, Kenna D, Grossman JA. 1999. The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on flexor tendon healing in chickens. J Hand Surg (Br) 24 (1) : 6-58.
34. Rodemann HP, Bayreuther K, Pfleiderer G. 1989. The differentiation of normal and transformed human fibroblasts in vitro influenced by electromagnetic fields. Exp Cell Res 182: 610-621.
35. Ryaby JT. 1998. Clinical effects of electromagnetic and electric fields on fracture healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355 Suppl: S205-S215.
36. Sermov D, Karba R, Valencic V. 1997. DC electrical stimulation for chronic wound healing enhancement. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 43: 271-277.
37. Stadelmann WK, Digenis AG, Tobin GR. 1998. Impediments to wound healing. Am J Surg 176: 39S-47S.
38. Strauch B, Patel MK, Rosen DJ, Mahadevia S, Brindzei N, Pilla AA. 2006. Pulsed magnetic field therapy increases tensile strength in a rat Achilles' tendon repair model. 31 (7) : 1131-1135.
39. Strauch B, Patel MK, Navarro JA, Berdichevsky M, Yu HL, Pilla AA. 2007. Pulsed magnetic fields accelerate cutaneous wound healing in rats. Plast Reconstr Surg 120 (2) : 425-430.
40. Tepper OM, Callaghan MJ, Chang EI, Galiano RD, Bhatt KA, Baharestani S, Gan J, Simon B, Hopper RA, Levine JP, Gurtner GC. 2004. Electromagnetic fields increase in vitro and in vivo angiogenesis through endothelial release of FGF-2. FASEB J 18 (11) : 1231-1233.
41. Thawer HA, Houghton PE. 1999. Effects of electrical stimulation on wound healing in diabetic mice. Wound Rep Reg 7: A332.
42. Thawer HA, Houghton PE, Kloth LC, Butryn A. 2000. Effects of electrical stimulation on wound closure in diabetic mice. Wound 12: 159-169.
43. Walker JL, Evans JM, Resing P, Guarnieri S, Meade P, Sisken BS. 1994. Enhancement of functional recovery following a crush lesion to the rat sciatic nerve by exposure to pulsed electromagnetic fields. Exp Neurol 125 (2) : 302-305.
44. Weiss DS, Kirsner R, Eagistein WH. 1990. Electrical stimulation and wound healing. Arch Dermatol 126: 222-225.
45. Yen-Patton GPA, Patton WF, Beer DM, Jacobson BS. 1988. Endothelial cell response to pulsed electromagnetic fields: Stimulation of growth rate and angiogenesis in vitro. J Cell Physiol 134: 37-46.