Effect of slice angle on inhomogeneity artifact and its correction in slice-selective MR imaging

Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part A: Bridging Education and Research

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 238-248

  Jung, Kwan Jin ^a,b   Moon, Chan Hong ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b University of Pittsburgh   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Inhomogeneity artifact; Oblique slice; Slice readout offset; Susceptibility artifact; View angle tilting

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952045742     PISSN: 15466086     EISSN: 15525023     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cmr.a.20143     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ludeke KM, Roschmann P, Tischler R. 1985. Susceptibility artefacts in NMR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 3:329-343.
2. Sekihara K, Kuroda M, Kohno H. 1984. Image restoration from non-uniform magnetic field influence for direct Fourier NMR imaging. Phys Med Biol 29:15-24.
3. O'donnell M, Edelstein WA. 1985. NMR imaging in the presence of magnetic field inhomogeneities and gradient field nonlinearities. Med Phys 12:20-26.
4. Lai C-M. 1983. Reconstructing NMR images from projections under inhomogeneous magnetic field and non-linear field gradients. Phys Med Biol 28:925-938.
5. Butts K, Pauly JM, Gold GE. 2005. Reduction of blurring in view angle tilting MRI. Magn Reson Med 53:418-424.
6. Chang H, Fitzpatrick J. 1992. A technique for accurate magnetic resonance imaging in the presence of field inhomogeneities. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 11:319-329.
7. Pauchard Y, Smith MR, Mintchev MP. 2005. Improving geometric accuracy in the presence of susceptibility difference artifacts produced by metallic implants in magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 24:1387-1399.
8. Sekihara K, Kohno H. 1987. Image restoration from nonuniform static field influence in modified echoplanar imaging. Med Phys 14:1087-1089.
9. Sumanaweera T, Glover G, Binford T, Adler J. 1993. MR susceptibility misregistration correction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 12:251-259.
10. Belaroussi B, Benoit-Cattin H, Odet C. 2006. CASTI: correction of susceptibility artifact in MR images using MRI simulation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing. Atlanta, GA. pp 897-900.
11. Cho ZH, Kim DJ, Kim YK. 1988. Total inhomogeneity correction including chemical shifts and susceptibility by view angle tilting. Med Phys 15:7-11.
12. Jung KJ, Cho ZH. 1991. Reduction of flow artifacts in NMR diffusion imaging using view-angle tilted line-integral projection reconstruction. Magn Reson Med 19:349-360.
13. Daniel BL, Butts K. 2000. The use of view angle tilting to reduce distortions in magnetic resonance imaging of cryosurgery. Magn Reson Imaging 18:281-286.
14. Viano AM, Gronemeyer SA, Haliloglu M, Hoffer FA. 2000. Improved MR imaging for patients with metallic implants. Magn Reson Imaging 18:287-295.
15. Kolind SH, MacKay AL, Munk PL, Xiang QS. 2004. Quantitative evaluation of metal artifact reduction techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging 20:487-495.
16. Olsen RV, Munk PL, Lee MJ, Janzen DL, MacKay AL, Xiang QS, Masri B. 2000. Metal artifact reduction sequence: early clinical applications. Radiographics 20:699-712.
17. Butts K, Pauly JM, Daniel BL, Kee S, Norbash AM. 1999. Management of biopsy needle artifacts: techniques for RF-refocused MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 9:586-595.
18. Chang SD, Lee MJ, Munk PL, Janzen DL, MacKay A, Xiang QS. 2001. MRI of spinal hardware: comparison of conventional T1-weighted sequence with a new metal artifact reduction sequence. Skeletal Radiol 30:213-218.
19. Haacke EM. 1999. Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design, Vol. 27. New York: Wiley. 914 p.
20. Reichenbach JR, Venkatesan R, Yablonskiy DA, Thompson MR, Lai S, Haacke EM. 1997. Theory and application of static field inhomogeneity effects in gradient-echo imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 7:266-279.
21. Hayman LA, Shukla V, Ly C, Taber KH. 2003. Clinical and imaging anatomy of the scalp. J Comput Assist Tomogr 27:454-459.
22. Jung KJ. 1991. A study of fluctuating flow in NMR imaging: application to arteriography and diffusion imaging. Ph.D. Thesis, Daejon: Korea Advance Institute of Science and Technology.
23. Bakker CJ, Bhagwandien R, Moerland MA, Ramos LM. 1994. Simulation of susceptibility artifacts in 2D and 3D Fourier transform spin-echo and gradientecho magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 12:767-774.
24. Yang QX, Smith MB, Briggs RW, Rycyna RE. 1999. Microimaging at 14 tesla using GESEPI for removal of magnetic susceptibility artifacts in T(2)(*)weighted image contrast. J Magn Reson 141:1-6.
25. Gai N, Axel L. 1997. Characterization of and correction for artifacts in linogram MRI. Magn Reson Med 37:275-284.
26. Lai C-M. 1982. Reconstructing NMR images under magnetic fields with large inhomogeneities. J Phys Part E: Sci Instrum 15:1093-1100.
27. Norris DG. 2001. Implications of bulk motion for diffusion-weighted imaging experiments: effects, mechanisms, and solutions. J Magn Reson Imaging 13:486-495.
28. Pipe JG. 1999. Motion correction with PROPELLER MRI: application to head motion and free-breathing cardiac imaging. Magn Reson Med 42:963-969.
29. Deichmann R, Gottfried JA, Hutton C, Turner R. 2003. Optimized EPI for fMRI studies of the orbitofrontal cortex. Neuroimage 19(2 Part 1):430-441.
30. Ojemann JG, Akbudak E, Snyder AZ, McKinstry RC, Raichle ME, Conturo TE. 1997. Anatomic localization and quantitative analysis of gradient refocused echo-planar fMRI susceptibility artifacts. Neuroimage 6:156-167.