Variations in pelvic and other sagittal spinal parameters as a function of race in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Spine

Volumn 35, Issue 10, 2010, Pages

  Lonner, Baron S ^a   Auerbach, Joshua D ^b   Sponseller, Paul ^c   Rajadhyaksha, Amar D ^a   Newton, Peter O ^d  

^a NYU HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Lumbar lordosis; Pelvic incidence; Sagittal balance; Scoliosis

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; KYPHOSIS; LORDOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PELVIS RADIOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RACE DIFFERENCE; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY;

ADOLESCENT; AGE FACTORS; ANTHROPOMETRY; CAUSALITY; COMPUTER COMMUNICATION NETWORKS; CONTINENTAL POPULATION GROUPS; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIATION; HUMANS; KYPHOSIS; LORDOSIS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; PELVIS; POSTURE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOLOGY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCOLIOSIS; SEX FACTORS; SPINE; THORACIC VERTEBRAE;

EID: 77951987097     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bb4f96     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Mac-Thiong JM, Berthonnaud E, Dimar JR II, et al. Sagittal alignment of the spine and pelvis during growth. Spine 2004; 29: 1642-7.
2. Marty C, Boisaubert B, Descamps H, et al. The sagittal anatomy of the sacrum among young adults, infants, and spondylolisthesis patients. Eur Spine J 2002; 11: 119-25.
3. Rajnics P, Templier A, Skalli W, et al. The association of sagittal spinal and pelvic parameters in asymptomatic persons and patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech 2002; 15: 24-30.
4. Vedantam R, Lenke LG, Keeney JA, et al. Comparison of standing sagittal spinal alignment in asymptomatic adolescents and adults. Spine 1998; 23: 211-5.
5. Jackson RP, Kanemura T, Kawakami N, et al. Lumbopelvic lordosis and pelvic balance on repeated standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and untreated patients with constant low back pain. Spine 2000; 25: 575-86.
6. Jackson RP, McManus AC. Radiographic analysis of sagittal plane alignment and balance in standing volunteers and patients with low back pain matched for age, sex, and size. A prospective controlled clinical study. Spine 1994; 19: 1611-8.
7. Jackson RP, Peterson MD, McManus AC, et al. Compensatory spinopelvic balance over the hip axis and better reliability in measuring lordosis to the pelvic radius on standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and patients. Spine 1998; 23: 1750-67.
8. Korovessis P, Stamatakis M, Baikousis A. Segmental roentgenographic analysis of vertebral inclination on sagittal plane in asymptomatic versus chronic low back pain patients. J Spinal Disord 1999; 12: 131-7.
9. Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Hecquet J, et al. Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 1998; 7: 99-103.
10. Rajnics P, Templier A, Skalli W, et al. The importance of spinopelvic parameters in patients with lumbar disc lesions. Int Orthop 2002; 26: 104-8.
11. Van Royen BJ, De Gast A, Smit TH. Deformity planning for sagittal plane corrective osteotomies of the spine in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur Spine J 2000; 9: 492-8.
12. Van Royen BJ, Toussaint HM, Kingma I, et al. Accuracy of the sagittal vertical axis in a standing lateral radiograph as a measurement of balance in spinal deformities. Eur Spine J 1998; 7: 408-12.
13. Vaz G, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, et al. Sagittal morphology and equilibrium of pelvis and spine. Eur Spine J 2002; 11: 80-7.
14. Labelle H, Roussouly P, Chopin D, et al. Spino-pelvic alignment after surgical correction for developmental spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 2008; 17: 1170-6.
15. Duval-Beaupere G, Schmidt C, Cosson P. A Barycentremetric study of the sagittal shape of spine and pelvis: the conditions required for an economic standing position. Ann Biomed Eng 1992; 20: 451-62.
16. Fernand R, Fox DE. Evaluation of lumbar lordosis. A prospective and retrospective study. Spine 1985; 10: 799-803.
17. Hanson P, Magnusson SP, Simonsen EB. Differences in sacral angulation and lumbosacral curvature in black and white young men and women. Acta Anat (Basel) 1998; 162: 226-31.
18. Hanson P, Magnusson SP, Sorensen H, et al. Differences in the iliolumbar ligament and the transverse process of the L5 vertebra in young white and black people. Acta Anat (Basel) 1998; 163: 218-23.
19. Labelle H, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, et al. The importance of spinopelvic balance in L5-S1 developmental spondylolisthesis: a review of pertinent radiologic measurements. Spine 2005; 30 (suppl 6) : S27-34.
20. Jackson RP, Phipps T, Hales C, et al. Pelvic lordosis and alignment in spondylolisthesis. Spine 2003; 28: 151-60.
21. Labelle H, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, et al. Spondylolisthesis, pelvic incidence, and spinopelvic balance: a correlation study. Spine 2004; 29: 2049-54.
22. Mac-Thiong JM, Labelle H, Charlebois M, et al. Sagittal plane analysis of the spine and pelvis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis according to the coronal curve type. Spine 2003; 28: 1404-9.
23. Ritzman TF, Upasani VV, Bastrom TP, et al. Comparison of compensatory curve spontaneous derotation after selective thoracic or lumbar fusions in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2008; 33: 2643-7.
24. Upasani VV, Tis J, Bastrom T, et al. Analysis of sagittal alignment in thoracic and thoracolumbar curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: how do these two curve types differ? Spine 2007; 32: 1355-9.
25. Potter BK, Lenke LG, Kuklo TR. Prevention and management of iatrogenic flatback deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86-A:1793-808.
26. Lafage V, Schwab F, Skalli W, et al. Standing balance and sagittal plane spinal deformity: analysis of spinopelvic and gravity line parameters. Spine 2008; 33: 1572-8.
27. Schwab F, Lafage V, Boyce R, et al. Gravity line analysis in adult volunteers: age-related correlation with spinal parameters, pelvic parameters, and foot position. Spine 2006; 31: E959-67.
28. Sangole AP, Aubin CE, Labelle H, et al. Three-dimensional classification of thoracic scoliotic curves. Spine 2009; 34: 91-9.