Effects of idealized joint geometry on finite element predictions of cartilage contact stresses in the hip

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 43, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1351-1357

  Anderson, Andrew E ^a,b   Ellis, Benjamin J ^b   Maas, Steve A ^b   Weiss, Jeffrey A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Boundary conditions; Cartilage pressures; Conchoid; Finite element; Hip; Sphere

Indexed keywords

BONE GEOMETRY; BONE MATERIALS; BONE-CARTILAGE INTERFACE; CARTILAGE MECHANICS; CARTILAGE SURFACES; COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; CONSTANT THICKNESS; CONTACT AREAS; CONTACT PRESSURES; CONTACT STRESS; DISTRIBUTED PATTERNS; FE MODEL; FINITE ELEMENT; FINITE ELEMENT MODELS; FINITE-ELEMENT PREDICTIONS; FITTING ERROR; HIP; HIP CARTILAGE; HIP JOINTS; JOINT GEOMETRY; LOADING CONDITION; RIGID BONES; SIMPLIFIED MODELS; SOCKET JOINTS; STAIR-CLIMBING; SUBJECT-SPECIFIC;

BIOMECHANICS; BONE; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; CARTILAGE; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; DEFORMATION; FORECASTING; HIP PROSTHESES; LIGAMENTS; PRESSURE; SPHERES; STAIRS; STRESSES;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

ARTICLE; ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DEFORMATION; BONE STRESS; CADAVER; CONTACT STRESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HIP; HUMAN; INTERFACE PRESSURE; MECHANICAL STRESS; MECHANICAL TORSION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE STRESS; WEIGHT BEARING;

ANIMALS; CARTILAGE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; WALKING; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 77951977005     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.01.010     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Afoke N.Y., Byers P.D., Hutton W.C. Contact pressures in the human hip joint. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1987, 69(4):536-541.
2. Anderson A.E., Ellis B.J., Maas S.A., Peters C.L., Weiss J.A. Validation of finite element predictions of cartilage contact pressures in the human hip joint. J. Biomech. Eng. 2008, 130(5):051008.
3. Anderson A.E., Ellis B.J., Peters C.L., Weiss J.A. Cartilage thickness: factors influencing multidetector CT measurements in a phantom study. Radiology 2008, 246(1):133-141.
4. Anderson A.E., Peters C.L., Tuttle B.D., Weiss J.A. Subject-specific finite element model of the pelvis: development, validation and sensitivity studies. J. Biomech. Eng. 2005, 127(3):364-373.
5. Ateshian G.A., Ellis B.J., Weiss J.A. Equivalence between short-time biphasic and incompressible elastic material responses. J. Biomech. Eng. 2007, 129(3):405-412.
6. Beck M., Kalhor M., Leunig M., Ganz R. Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2005, 87(7):1012-1018.
7. Bergmann G. Hip98: Data Collection of Hip Joint Loading on CD-ROM 1998, Free University and Humboldt University, Berlin.
8. Bergmann G., Deuretzbacher G., Heller M., Graichen F., Rohlmann A., Strauss J., Duda G.N. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J. Biomech. 2001, 34(7):859-871.
9. Bitsakos C., Kerner J., Fisher I., Amis A.A. The effect of muscle loading on the simulation of bone remodeling in the proximal femur. J. Biomech. 2005, 38(1):133-139.
10. Buchler P., Ramaniraka N.A., Rakotomanana L.R., Iannotti J.P., Farron A. A finite element model of the shoulder: application to the comparison of normal and osteoarthritic joints. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon) 2002, 17(9-10):630-639.
11. Cooperman D.R., Wallensten R., Stulberg S.D. Acetabular dysplasia in the adult. Clin. Orthop. 1983, 175:79-85.
12. Dalstra M., Huiskes R., van Erning L. Development and validation of a three-dimensional finite element model of the pelvic bone. J. Biomech. Eng. 1995, 117(3):272-278.
13. Ferguson S.J., Bryant J.T., Ganz R., Ito K. The influence of the acetabular labrum on hip joint cartilage consolidation: a poroelastic finite element model. J. Biomech. 2000, 33(8):953-960.
14. Ferguson S.J., Bryant J.T., Ganz R., Ito K. An in vitro investigation of the acetabular labral seal in hip joint mechanics. J. Biomech. 2003, 36(2):171-178.
15. Genda E., Iwasaki N., Li G., MacWilliams B.A., Barrance P.J., Chao E.Y. Normal hip joint contact pressure distribution in single-leg standing-effect of gender and anatomic parameters. J. Biomech. 2001, 34(7):895-905.
16. Genda E., Konishi N., Hasegawa Y., Miura T. A computer simulation study of normal and abnormal hip joint contact pressure. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 1995, 114(4):202-206.
17. Harris W.H. Etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin. Orthop. 1986, 213:20-33.
18. Hestenes M.R. Multiplier and gradient methods. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 1969, 4:303-320.
19. Hughes T.J., Liu W.K. Nonliner finite element analysis of shells: Part I. two dimensional shells. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. 1981, 27:167-181.
20. Iglic A., Kralj-Iglic V., Daniel M., Macek-Lebar A. Computer determination of contact stress distribution and size of weight bearing area in the human hip joint. Comput. Meth. Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 2002, 5(2):185-192.
21. Ipavec M., Brand R.A., Pedersen D.R., Mavcic B., Kralj-Iglic V., Iglic A. Mathematical modeling of stress in the hip during gait. J. Biomech. 1999, 32(11):1229-1235.
22. Ipavec M., Iglic A., Iglic V.K., Srakar F. Stress distribution on the hip joint articular surface during gait. Pflugers Arch. 1996, 431(6, Suppl. 2):R275-R276.
23. Kang M. Hip joint center location by fitting conchoid shape to the acetabular rim region of MR images. Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS 2004, IEEE, San Francisco, CA, USA.
24. Kang M., Sadri H., Moccozet L., Magnenat-Thalmann N., Hoffmeyer P. Accurate simulation of hip joint range of motion. IEEE Proc. Comput. Animation 2002, pp. 1087-4844(2).
25. Kim W.Y., Hutchinson C.E., Andrew J.G., Allen P.D. The relationship between acetabular retroversion and osteoarthritis of the hip. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2006, 88(6):727-729.
26. Li L., Shirazi-Adl A., Buschmann M.D. Investigation of mechanical behavior of articular cartilage by fibril reinforced poroelastic models. Biorheology 2003, 40(1-3):227-233.
27. Macirowski T., Tepic S., Mann R.W. Cartilage stresses in the human hip joint. J. Biomech. Eng. 1994, 116(1):10-18.
28. Maker, B.N., Ferencz, R.M., Hallquist, J.O., 1990. NIKE3D: a nonlinear, implicit, three-dimensional finite element code for solid and structural mechanics. Technical Report UCRL-MA (105268), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
29. Mankin H.J. The reaction of articular cartilage to injury and osteoarthritis (first of two parts). N. Engl. J. Med. 1974, 291(24):1285-1292.
30. Mankin H.J. The reaction of articular cartilage to injury and osteoarthritis (second of two parts). N. Engl. J. Med. 1974, 291(25):1335-1340.
31. Mavcic B., Pompe B., Antolic V., Daniel M., Iglic A., Kralj-Iglic V. Mathematical estimation of stress distribution in normal and dysplastic hips. J. Orthop. Res. 2002, 20(5):1025-1030.
32. Menschik F. The hip joint as a conchoid shape. J. Biomech. 1997, 30(9):971-973.
33. Michaeli D.A., Murphy S.B., Hipp J.A. Comparison of predicted and measured contact pressures in normal and dysplastic hips. Med. Eng. Phys. 1997, 19(2):180-186.
34. Mow V.C., Setton L.A., Guilak F., Ratcliffe A. Mechanical factors in articular cartilage and their role in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritic Disorders 1995, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
35. Murphy S., Tannast M., Kim Y.J., Buly R., Millis M.B. Debridement of the adult hip for femoroacetabular impingement: indications and preliminary clinical results. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2004, 429:178-181.
36. Park S., Hung C.T., Ateshian G.A. Mechanical response of bovine articular cartilage under dynamic unconfined compression loading at physiological stress levels. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2004, 12(1):65-73.
37. Phillips A.T., Pankaj P., Howie C.R., Usmani A.S., Simpson A.H. Finite element modeling of the pelvis: inclusion of muscular and ligamentous boundary conditions. Med. Eng. Phys. 2007, 29(7):739-748.
38. Pistoia W., van Rietbergen B., Laib A., Ruegsegger P. High-resolution three-dimensional-pQCT images can be an adequate basis for in-vivo microFE analysis of bone. J. Biomech. Eng. 2001, 123(2):176-183.
39. Poole A.R. Imbalances of anabolism and catabolism of cartilage matrix components in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritic Disorders 1995, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
40. Reynolds D., Lucas J., Klaue K. Retroversion of the acetabulum. A cause of hip pain. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1999, 81(2):281-288.
41. Rushfeldt P.D., Mann R.W., Harris W.H. Improved techniques for measuring in vitro the geometry and pressure distribution in the human acetabulum-I. Ultrasonic measurement of acetabular surfaces, sphericity and cartilage thickness. J. Biomech. 1981, 14(4):253-260.
42. Russell M.E., Shivanna K.H., Grosland N.M., Pedersen D.R. Cartilage contact pressure elevations in dysplastic hips: a chronic overload model. J. Orthop. Surg. 2006, 1:6.
43. Shepherd D.E., Seedhom B.B. Thickness of human articular cartilage in joints of the lower limb. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 1999, 58(1):27-34.
44. Speirs A.D., Heller M.O., Duda G.N., Taylor W.R. Physiologically based boundary conditions in finite element modeling. J. Biomech. 2007, 40(10):2318-2323.
45. von Eisenhart-Rothe R., Eckstein F., Muller-Gerbl M., Landgraf J., Rock C., Putz R. Direct comparison of contact areas, contact stress and subchondral mineralization in human hip joint specimens. Anat. Embryol. (Berlin) 1997, 195(3):279-288.
46. Xi J., Hu X., Jin Y. Shape Analysis and parameterzied modeling of hip joint. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. 2003, 3:260-265.
47. Yoshida H., Faust A., Wilckens J., Kitagawa M., Fetto J., Chao E.Y. Three-dimensional dynamic hip contact area and pressure distribution during activities of daily living. J. Biomech. 2006, 39(11):1996-2004.