Democratization and violence: European and international perspectives

Violence in Europe: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 205-225

  Karstedt, Susanne ^a  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951974117     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-09705-3_12     Document Type: Chapter

References (63)

1. Cohen, D. (2001). Chasing The Red. The White And The Blue: A Journey in Tocqueville's Footsteps Through Contemporary America. New York : Picador .
2. Davis Rodriguez, C. (2006). Civil Democracy, Perceived Risk and Insecurity in Brazil: an Extension of the Systemic Social Control Model. In S. Karstedt & G. LaFree (Eds.), Democracy, CrimeandJustice. TheAnnalsofthe American Academyof Political andSocial Sciences. 605. 242-263.
3. Eisner, M. (1997). Das Endeder zivilisierten Stadt. Die Auswirkungen vonModernisierung und urbaner Krise aufGewaltdelinquenz, Frankfurt: Campus.
4. Eisner, M. (2001). Modernization, Self-Control and Lethal Violence. The Long-Term Dynamics of European Homicide Rates in Theoretical Perspective. British Journal of Criminology, 41, 618-638 .
5. Eisner, M. (2003). Long-Term Historical Trends in Violent Crime. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime And Justice. An Annual Review of Research, 30, 83-142.
6. Elster, J. (Ed.) (1999). Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Ewald, U. (2000). Criminal Victimization and Social Adaptation in Modernity: Fear of Crime and Risk Perception in the New Germany. In T. Hope & R. Sparks (Eds.), Crime. Risk And insecurity: LawAndOrderin Everyday Life And Political Discourse (pp . 197-219). London and New York : Routledge.
8. Gellner, E. (1994). Conditions Of Liberty: CivilSociety and its Rivals. New York : Penguin.
9. Gibson, J. L. & Duch, R. M. (1994). Postmaterialism and the Emerging Soviet Democracy. Political Research Quarterly, 47, 5-39.
10. Gurr, T. R. (1993) . Minorities at risk. A global view of ethnopolitical conflicts. Washington D.C.: United States Institute of Peace.
11. Gurr, T. R. (2000). People versus states. Minorities at risk in the nell' century. Washington D.C.: United States Institute of Peace.
12. Hagan, J. & Radoeva, D. (1998). Both too Much and too Little: From Elite to Street Crime in the Transformation of the Czech Republic. Crime. Law & Social Change, 28, 195-211.
13. Hagan, J., Hefler, G., Classen, G., Boehnke, K. & Merkens, H. (1998). Subterrenean Sources of Subcultural Delinquency Beyond The American Dream. Criminology, 36, 309-342.
14. Holmes, S. (1993). TheAnatomyOf Antiliberalism. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
15. Huggins, M., Haritos-Fatouros, M. & Zimbardo, P. G. (2002). Violence Workers: Police Torturers And Murderers Reconstruct Brazilian Atrocities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and Postmodemization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
17. Inglehart, R. & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Inkeles, A. (1993). On Measuring Democracy. Its Consequences And Concomitants. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.
19. Jaggers, K. & Gurr, T. (1995). Tracking Democracy's Third Wave with the Polity III Data. Journal ofPeace Research, 32, 469-482.
20. Karstedt, S. (1999). Social Transformation and Crime: A Crisis of Deregulation. In M. Krygier & A. Czarnota (Eds.), The Rule of Law After Communism. Problems and Prospects in East-Central Europe (pp. 308-326). Aldershot: Ashgate.
21. Karstedt, S. (2001). Die moralische Staerke schwacher Bindungen: Individualismus und Gewalt im Kulturvergleich, Monatsschrift fuer Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform, 84, 226-243.
22. Karstedt, S. (2003). Legacies of a Culture of Inequality: The Janus Face of Crime in PostCommunist Countries . Crime, Law and Social Change, 40, 295-320.
23. Karstedt, S, (2005). Individualisme et Violence: Modernisation Extreme ou ReTraditionalisation de la Societe? Une Comparaison Interculturelle. Deviance et Societe. 29, 273-284.
24. Karstedt, S. (2006). Democracy, values and violence: Paradoxes, tensions and comparative advantages of liberal inclusion. In S. Karstedt and G. LaFree (Eds.), Democracy, Crime and Justice. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 605,50-81.
25. Keane, J. (2004). Violence and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Kharkhordin, O. (1999). The collective and the individual in Russia: A study of practice. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
27. Klages, H. (1984). Wertorientierungen im Wandel. Ruckblick, Gegenwartsanalyse, Prognosen. Frankfurt: Campus.
28. LaFree, G. (1998). Losing Legitimacy. Street Crime and the Decline OfSocial Institutions in America. Boulder, Col: Westview Press.
29. LaFree, G. & Drass, K. A. (2002). Counting Crime Booms Among Nations : Evidence for Homicide Victimization Rates 1956 -1998. Criminology, 40, 769- 800.
30. LaFree, G.& Tseloni, A. (2006). Democracy and Crime:A Multilevel Analysis of Homicide in 44 Countries. In S. Karstedt & G. LaFree (Eds.), Democracy, Crime and Justice. The Annals ofthe American Academy ofPolitical and Social Sciences. 605, 26-49 .
31. Lauth, H.-J., Pickel, G. & Welzel, C. (2000). Demokratiemessung. Konzepte und Befunde im internationalen Vergleich . Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
32. Lederman, D., Loayza, N. & Menedez, A. (2002). Violent Crime: Does Social Capital Matter. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 50, 509-539 .
33. Los, M. (1988). Communist Ideology, Law and Crime. London: Macmillan Press; New York: SI. Martin's Press.
34. Los, M. (2003). Post-communist Fear of Crime and the Commercialization of Security. Theoretical Criminology, 6, 165-88.
35. Mann, M. (1970). The Social Cohesion Of Liberal Democracies. American Sociological Review, 35, 423-439.
36. Mann, M. (2005). The Dark Side of Democracy. Explaining Ethnical Cleansing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Mendez, J. E. (1999). Problems of Lawless Violence: Introduction. In J. E. Mendez, G. O'Donnell & P.S. Pinheiro (Eds.), The (un)rule of law and the underprivileged in Latin America (pp. 1-25). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
38. Mendes, J. E., O'Donnell, G. & Pinheiro, P. S. (1999). The (un)rule of law and the underprivilegedin Latin America. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
39. Messner, S. F. (1982). Societal development, social inequality and homicide. Across-national test ofa Durkheimian model. Social Forces, 61, 225-240.
40. Messner, S. F. (2004). An Institutional-anomie theory Of Crime: Continuities And Elaborations in the Study Of Social Structure And Anomie. In D. Oberwittler & S. Karstedt (Eds.), Soziologie del' Kriminalitdt (pp. 93-109). Special volume 43 of the Kellner Zeitschriftfur SoziologieundSozialpsychologie. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
41. Messner, S. F. & Rosenfeld, R. (1994). Crime and the American Dream. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth
42. Messner, S. F. & Rosenfeld, R. (1998). Social Structure And Homicide. In M. D. Smith & M. A. Zahn (Eds.), Homicide: A SourcebookOfSocial Research (pp. 27- 41). New York : Sage.
43. Muller, E. N. & Seligson, M. A. (1994). Civic Culture And Democracy: The Question of Causal Relationships. American PoliticalScience Review, 88, 635-652.
44. Nowotny, T. (2002). Markets, Democracy and Social Capital. Osterreichische Zeitschrift fiir Politikwissenschaft, 31, 217-229.
45. Pridemore, W. A. (2003). Measuring Homicide in Russia: A Comparison of Estimates from the Crime and Vital Statistics Reporting Systems. Social Science & Medicine, 57, 1343-1354.
46. Pridemore, W. A. & Kim, S.-W. (2006). Democratization and Political Change as Threats to Collective Sentiments : Testing Durkheim in Russia. In S. Karstedt & G. LaFree (Eds.), Democracy, CrimeandJustice. The Annalsofthe AmericanAcademyofPoliticaland Social Sciences, 605, 82-103
47. Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M. E., Cheibub, J. A. & Limongi, F. (2000). Democracy and Development. Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950-1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. Rose, R. (1998). Getting things Done In An Anti-Modern Society: Social Capital Networks In Russia. Social Capital Initiative Working Paper, 6. Washington: World Bank.
49. Rosenfeld, R., Messner, S. F. & Baumer, E. P. (2001). Social Capital and Homicide. Social Forces, 80,283-309.
50. Rothstein, B. & Stolle, D. (2002) . How PoliticalInstitutionsCreateandDestroy SocialCapital. An Institutional Theory ofGeneralized Trust Project on Honesty and Trust. Workshop 2, Collegium Budapest. Budapest
51. Sampson, R. & Bartusch, D. J. (1998). Legal Cynicism and (Subcultural?) Tolerance of Deviance: The Neighborhood Context of Racial Differences. Law & Society Review, 32, 777-804.
52. Sampson, R. J., Raudenbusch, S. W. & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods And Violent Crime: A Multilevel Study Of Collective Efficacy. Science, 277,918-924.
53. Savolainen, J. (2000). Inequality, Welfare State, and Homicide: Further Support for the Institutional Anomie Theory. Criminology, 38,1021-1042 .
54. Steinberg, J. (200I). Crime Wave. TheSouth African Underworld and Its Foes. Witwatersrand: Witwatersrand University Press.
55. Sztompka, P. (1993). Civilizational Incompetence : The Trap of Post-Communist Societies. Zeitschrift fuer Soziologie, 22, 85-95.
56. Tocqueville, A. (2000[1835 and 1840]) Democracy in America. Chicago : Chicago University Press.
57. Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press.
58. Tyler, T. R. (2003). Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and the Effective Rule of Law. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research (pp . 283-357) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59. Tyler, T. R. & Blader, S. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Proceduraljustice, socialidentity, and behavioral engagement. Philadelph ia: Psychology Press.
60. Walberg, P., McKee, M., Shkolnikov, V., Chenet, L. & Leon, D. A. (1998). Economic Change, Crime, and Mortality Crisis in Russia: Regional Analysis. British Medical Journal, 317, 312-318.
61. Waldmann, P. (2002). Der anomische Staat. Uber Recht. offentiiche Sicherheit und Alltag in Lateinamerika. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.
62. Waldmann, P. (2003). Diktatur, Demokratisierung undsozialeAnomie. Miinchen: Vogel.
63. Welzel, C. (2002). Fluchtpunkt Humanentwicklung. Uber die Grundlagen der Demokratie und die UrsachenihrerAusbreitung. Wiesbaden : Westdeutscher Verlag.