Homeopathic treatment of patients with migraine: A prospective observational study with a 2-year follow-up period

Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 347-355

  Witt, Claudia M ^a   Lüdtke, Rainer ^b   Willich, Stefan N ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b Karl and Veronica Carstens Foundation   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE DURATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; GENERAL CONDITION IMPROVEMENT; HOMEOPATHY; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL HISTORY; MIGRAINE; MULTICENTER STUDY; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RATING SCALE; SHORT FORM 36; TREATMENT OUTCOME; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HEALTH SURVEY; MIDDLE AGED; MIGRAINE DISORDERS; OBSERVATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE;

MATERIA MEDICA;

ADULT; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HEALTH SURVEYS; HOMEOPATHY; HUMANS; MALE; MATERIA MEDICA; MIDDLE AGED; MIGRAINE DISORDERS; OBSERVATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77951955072     PISSN: 10755535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/acm.2009.0376     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Stovner LJ, Hagen K, Jensen R, et al. The global burden of headache: A documentation of headache prevalence and disability worldwide. Cephalalgia 2007; 27: 193-210.
2. Bahra A. Headache and migraine. Br J Hosp Med 2007; 68: 195-200.
3. Freitag FG. The cycle of migraine: Patients' quality of life during and between migraine attacks. Clin Ther 2007: 939-949.
4. Ramadan NM. Current trends in migraine prophylaxis. Headache 2007; 47 (suppl 1) :S52-S57.
5. Silberstein SD. Practice Parameter: Evidence-Based Guidelines for Migraine Headache (An Evidence-Based Review) : Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academie of Neurology. 2000. Online document at: www.neurology.org Accessed December 17, 2007.
6. Grazzi L, Usai S, Bussone G. Chronic headaches: Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment. Neurol Sci 2007; 28 (suppl 2) : S134-S137.
7. Nestoriuc Y, Martin A. Efficacy of biofeedback for migraine: A meta-analysis. Pain 2007; 128: 111-127.
8. Endres HG, Diener HC, Molsberger A. Role of acupuncture in the treatment of migraine. Expert Rev Neurother 2007; 7: 1121-1134.
9. Melchart D, Streng A, Hoppe A, et al. Acupuncture in patients with tension-type headache: Randomized controlled trial. BMJ 2005; 331: 376-382.
10. Melchart D, Streng A, Hoppe A, et al. The acupuncture randomised trial (ART) for tension-type headache: Details of the treatment. Acup Med 2005; 23: 157-165. (Pubitemid 43097815)
11. Melchart D, Linde K, Streng A, et al. Acupuncture randomized trials (ART) in patients with migraine or tension-type headache: Design and protocols. Forsch Komplementärmed Klass Naturheilkd 2003; 10: 179-184. (Pubitemid 37140376)
12. Linde K, Streng A, Hoppe A, et al. Treatment in a randomized multicenter trial of acupuncture for Migraine (ART Migraine). Forsch Komplementärmed 2006; 13: 101-108.
13. Linde K, Streng A, Jürgens S, et al. Acupuncture for patients with migraine. JAMA 2005; 293: 2118-2125.
14. Linde K, Allais G, Brinkhaus B, et al. Acupuncture for migraine prophylaxis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; 1: CD001218.
15. Jacobs J, Chapman EH, Crothers D. Patient characteristics and practice patterns of physicians using homeopathy. Arch Fam Med 1998; 7: 537-540.
16. Becker-Witt C, Lüdtke R, Weißhuhn TER, et al. Diagnoses and treatment in homeopathic medical practice. Forsch Komplementärmed Klass Naturheilkd 2004; 11: 98-103.
17. Ong CK, Bodeker G, Grundy C, et al. WHO Global Atlas of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Kobe, Japan: World Health Organization, Centre for Health Development, 2005.
18. Eisenberg D, Davis R, Ettner S, et al. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997: Results of a follow-up national survey. JAMA 1998; 280: 1569-1575.
19. Härtel U, Volger E. Utilization and acceptance of classical naturopathies and alternative therapies in Germany: Results of a representative population study [in German]. Das Gesundheitswesen 2003:A35.
20. Ernst E. Are highly dilute homoeopathic remedies placebos? Perfusion 1998: 291-292.
21. Linde K, Clausius N, Ramirez G et al. Are the effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? A meta-analysis of randomized, placebo controlled trials. Lancet 1997; 350: 834-843.
22. Shang A, Huwiler-Müntener K, Nartey L, et al. Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy. Lancet 2005; 366: 726-732.
23. Lüdtke R, Rutten AL. The conclusions on the effectiveness of homeopathy highly depend on the set of analyzed trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2008; 61: 1197-1204.
24. Witt CM, Lüdtke R, Baur R, et al. Homeopathic medical practice: Long-term results of a cohort study with 3981 patients. BMC Public Health 2005; 5:115.
25. Witt C, Lüdtke R, Willich SN. Effect size in patients treated by homeopathy differs according to diagnosis: Results of an observational study. Perfusion 2005: 356-360.
26. World Health Organization (WHO). 2008 ICD-9-CM Diagnosis 346.9 [Migraine]. 2008. Online document at: www.icd9data.com/2008/Volume1/320-389/340- 349/346/346.9.htm Accessed August 2, 2008.
27. Huskisson E, Scott J. VAS Visual Analogue Scales; also VAPS Visual Analogue Pain Scales; NRS Numeric Rating Scales; Mod. Categorial Scales [in German]. In: Westhoff G, ed. Manual of Psychosocial Measuring Instruments-A Compendium for Epidemiological and Clinical Research on Chronic Disease. Göttingen: Hogrefe, 1993: 881-885.
28. Bullinger M, Kirchberger I. SF-36 Health Status Questionnaire: Manual [in German]. Göttingen: Hogrefe, 1998.
29. Rubin DB. Multiple Imputations for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1987.
30. Diggle P, Liang K, Zeger S. Analysis of Longitudinal Data. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.
31. Barnett AG, Van der Pols JC, Dobson AJ. Regression to the mean: What it is and how to deal with it. Int J Epidem 2005: 215-220.
32. Mee R, Chua T. Regression toward the mean and the paired sample t test. Am Statistician 1991: 39-42.
33. Marstedt G, Moebus S. Federal health report: Utilization of alternative methods in medicine [in German]. Berlin: Robert Koch Institut, 2002.
34. Hoffmann S. The spectrum of diagnoses in homeopathic practices: A prospective observation study and a comparison with conventional practices [in German]. Berlin: Medizinische Fakultät; Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 2007.
35. Anelli M, Scheepers L, Sermeus G, et al. Homeopathy and health related Quality of Life: A survey in six European countries. Homeopathy 2002; 91: 18-21.
36. Fortes L, Fraiz IC. Homoeopathy from the patient's standpoint: An empirical study in the city of Curitiba (Brazil), 1998-99. In: Dinges M, ed. Patients in the History of Homoeopathy. Sheffield: European Association for the History of Medicine and Health Publications, 2002: 301-316.
37. Kerek-Bodden H, Koch H, Brenner G, et al. Diagnostic spectrum and treatment requirements of general practice clients: Results of the ADT Panel of the Central Institute of National Health Insurance Management [in German]. Z Ärztl Fortbild Qualitätssich 2000; 94: 21-30.
38. Spence DS, Thompson EA, Barron SJ. Homeopathic treatment for chronic disease: A 6-year, university-hospital outpatient observational study. J Altern Complement Med 2005; 11: 793-798.
39. Sharples F, van Haselen R. Patients perspective on using a complementary medicine approach to their health: A survey at the Royal London Homoeopathic Hospital. London: NHS Trust, 1998.
40. Jain A. Does homeopathy reduce the cost of conventional drug prescribing? A study of comparative prescribing costs in general practice. Homeopathy 2003; 92: 71-76.
41. Van Wassenhoven M, Ives G. An observational study of patients receiving homeopathic treatment. Homeopathy 2004; 93: 3-11.
42. Deveugele M, Derese A, van den Brink-Muinen A, et al. Consultation length in general practice: Cross sectional study in six European countries. BMJ 2002: 472-477.
43. Bahrs O. My Family Physician Has Time for Me-Wish and Reality. GGW 2003: 17-23.
44. Muscari-Tomaioli G, Allegri F, Miali E, et al. Observational study of quality of life in patients with headache, receiving homeopathic treatment. Br Hom J 2001; 90: 189-197.
45. Owen JM, Green BN. Homeopathic treatment of headaches: A systematic review of the literature. J Chiroprac Med 2004; 3: 45-52.
46. Brigo B, Serpelloni G. Homoeopathic treatment of migraines: A randomized double-blind controlled study of sixty cases (homoeopathic remedy versus placebo). Berlin J Res Hom 1991; 1: 98-106.
47. Walach H, Haeusler W, Lowes T, et al. Classical homeopathic treatment of chronic headaches. Cephalalgia 1997; 17: 119-126.
48. Walach H, Lowes T, Mussbach D, et al. The long term effects of homeopathic treatment of chronic headaches: One year follow-up and single case time series analysis. Br Hom J 2001: 63-72.
49. Stewart WF, Simon D, Shechter A, et al. Population variation in migraine prevalence: A meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1995; 48: 269-280.
50. Whitmarsh T. The nature of evidence in complementary and alternative medicine: Ideas from trials of homeopathy in chronic headache. In: Callahan D, ed. The Role of Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Accommodating Pluralism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2002: 148-162.
51. Whitmarsh TE, Coleston-Shields DM, Steiner TJ. Doubleblind randomised placebo-controlled study of homoeopathic prophylaxis of migraine. Cephalalgia 1997:600-604.
52. Straumsheim P, Borchgrevink C, Mowinckel P, et al. Homeopathic treatment of migraine: A double blind, placebo controlled trial of 68 patients. Br Hom J 2000; 89: 4-7.
53. Whitmarsh T. More lessons from migraine. Br Hom J 2000: 1-2.
54. Vithoulkas G. The Science of Homeopathy. New York: Grove Press, 1980.
55. Macedo A, Banos JE, Farre M. Placebo response in the prophylaxis of migraine: A meta-analysis. Eur J Pain 2008; 12: 68-75.
56. Diener HC, Limmroth V. Medication overuse headache: A worldwide problem. Lancet Neurol 2004: 475-483.
57. Di Blasi Z, Harkness E, Ernst E, et al. Influence of context effects on health outcomes: A systematic review. Lancet 2001; 357: 757-762.
58. Astin JA. Why patients use alternative medicine: results of a national study. JAMA 1998; 279: 1548-1553.
59. Bell IR, Koithan M, Gorman MM, Baldwin CM. Homeopathic practitioner views of changes in patients undergoing constitutional treatment for chronic disease. J Altern Complement Med 2003; 9: 39-50.
60. Enck P, Benedetti F, Schedlowski M. New insights into the placebo and nocebo responses. Neuron 2008; 59: 195-206.
61. Price DD, Finniss DG, Benedetti F. A comprehensive review of the placebo effect: recent advances and current thought. Annu Rev Psychol 2008; 59: 565-590.
62. Schmitz M, ed. Currents of Homeopathy: Concepts-Teachers-Propagation [in German]. Essen: KVC Verlag, 2000.
63. Miller FG, Kaptchuk TJ. The power of context: Reconceptualizing the placebo effect. J R Soc Med 2008; 101: 222-225.
64. Frenkel O. A phenomenology of the 'placebo effect': Taking meaning from the mind to the body. J Med Philos 2008; 33: 58-79.
65. Walach H, Jonas WB. Placebo research: The evidence base for harnessing self-healing capacities. Online document at: www.libertonline.com/doi/abs/10. 1089%2Facm.2004.10. S-103.
66. Kaptchuk TJ, Miller FG. What is the best and most ethical model for the relationship between mainstream and alternative medicine: Opposition, integration, or pluralism? Acad Med 2005; 80: 286-290.