Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF): Properties and frontier of current knowledge

Annals of General Psychiatry

Volumn 9, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Aas, IH Monrad ^a  

^a Vestfold Mental Health Care Trust   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GLOBAL ASSESSMENT FUNCTIONING; MENTAL HEALTH; PROGNOSIS; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; SYMPTOMATOLOGY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 77951949435     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1744859X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1744-859X-9-20     Document Type: Review

References (96)

1. Piersma HL, Boes JL. The GAF and psychiatric outcome: a descriptive report. Comm Ment Health J 1997, 33:35-41.
2. Salvi G, Leese M, Slade M. Routine use of mental health outcome assessments: choosing the measure. Br J Psychiatry 2005, 186:146-152. 10.1192/bjp.186.2.146, 15684239.
3. Vatnaland T, Vatnaland J, Friis S, Opjordsmoen S. Are GAF scores reliable in routine clinical use?. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2007, 115:326-330. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2006.00925.x, 17355524.
4. Bates LW, Lyons JA, Shaw JB. Effects of brief training on application of the global assessment of functioning scale. Psychol Rep 2002, 91:999-1006. 10.2466/PR0.91.7.999-1006, 12530758.
5. Goldman HH. 'Do you walk to school, or do you carry your lunch?'. Psychiatr Serv 2005, 56:419.
6. Greenberg GA, Rosenheck RA. Using the GAF as a national mental health outcome measure in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Psychiatr Serv 2005, 56:420-426. 10.1176/appi.ps.56.4.420, 15812091.
7. Greenberg GA, Rosenheck RA. Continuity of care and clinical outcomes in a national health system. Psychiatr Serv 2005, 56:427-433. 10.1176/appi.ps.56.4.427, 15812092.
8. Niv N, Cohen AN, Sullivan G, Young A. The MIRECC Version of the Global Assessment of Functioning scale: reliability and validity. Psychiatr Serv 2007, 58:529-535. 10.1176/appi.ps.58.4.529, 17412856.
9. Fallmyr T, Repål A. Evaluering av GAF-skåring som del av Minste Basis Datasett [Evaluation of GAF-scoring as part of minimum basis dataset]. Tidsskr Nor Psykologforening 2002, 39:1118-1119.
10. Pedersen G, Hagtvedt KA, Karterud S. Generalizability studies of the Global Assessment of Functioning - split version. Compr Psychiatry 2007, 48:88-94. 10.1016/j.comppsych.2006.03.008, 17145287.
11. Oliver P, Cooray S, Tyrer P, Ciccheti D. Use of the Global Assessment of Functioning scale in learning disability. Br J Psychiatry 2003, 182:s32-s35.
12. Rosenbaum B, Valbak K, Harder S, Knudsen P, Køster A, Lajer M, Lindhart A, Winther G, Petersen L, Jørgensen P, Nordentoft M, Andreasen AH. The Danish National Schizophrenia Project: prospective, comparative longitudinal treatment study of first-episode psychosis. Br J Psychiatry 2005, 186:394-399. 10.1192/bjp.186.5.394, 15863743.
13. Söderberg P, Tungström S, Armelius B. Reliability of Global Assessment of Functioning ratings made by clinical psychiatric staff. Psychiatr Serv 2005, 56:434-438. 10.1176/appi.ps.56.4.434, 15812093.
14. Schorre BEH, Vandvik IH. Global assessment of psychosocial functioning in child and adolescent psychiatry. A review of three unidimensional scales (CGAS, GAF, GAPD). Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2004, 13:273-286. 10.1007/s00787-004-0390-2, 15490275.
15. Moos RH, McCoy L, Moos BS. Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) ratings: determinants and role as predictors of one-year treatment outcomes. J Clin Psychol 2000, 56:449-461. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(200004)56:4<449::AID-JCLP1>3.0.CO;2-8, 10775040.
16. Rosse RB, Deutsch SI. Use of the Global Assessment of Functioning scale in the VHA: moving toward improved precision. Veterans Health Syst J 2000, 5:50-58.
17. Goldman HH, Skodol AE, Lave TR. Revising axis V for DSM-IV: a review of measures of social functioning. Am J Psychiatry 1992, 149:1148-1156.
18. Endicott J, Spitzer RL, Fleiss JL, Cohen J. The Global Assessment Scale; a procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1976, 33:766-771.
19. Loevdahl H, Friis S. Routine evaluation of mental health: reliable information or worthless 'guesstimates'?. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1996, 93:125-128. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1996.tb09813.x, 8686482.
20. Luborsky L. Clinicians' judgements of mental health. A proposed scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1962, 7:35-45.
21. Dworkin RJ, Friedman LC, Telschow RL, Grant KD, Moffic HS, Sloan VJ. The longitudinal use of the Global Assessment Scale in multiple-rater situations. Comm Ment Health J 1990, 26:335-344.
22. McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires 1987, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
23. Karterud S, Pedersen G, Løvdal H, Friis S. S-GAF. Global funksjonsskåring - splittet versjon (Global Assessment of Functioning - Split version). Bakgrunn og skåringsveiledning 1998, Oslo, Norway: Klinikk for Psykiatri, Ullevål sykehus.
24. Thomson C. Introduction. The instruments of psychiatric research 1989, 1-17. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Thomson C.
25. Burlingame GM, Dunn TW, Chen S, Lehman A, Axman R, Earnshaw D, Rees FM. Selection of outcome assessment instruments for inpatients with severe and persistent mental illness. Psychiatr Serv 2005, 56:444-451. 10.1176/appi.ps.56.4.444, 15812095.
26. Hilsenroth MJ, Ackerman SJ, Blagys MD, Bauman BD, Baity MR, Smith SR, Price JL, Smith CL, Heindselman TL, Mount MK, Holdwick DJ. Reliability and validity of DSM-IV axis V. Am J Psychiatry 2000, 157:1858-1863. 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.11.1858, 11058486.
27. Startup M, Jackson MC, Bendix S. The concurrent validity of the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). Br J Clin Psychol 2002, 41:417-422. 10.1348/014466502760387533, 12437796.
28. Hall RCW. Global Assessment of functioning. A modified scale. Psychosomatics 1995, 36:267-275.
29. Hay P, Katsikitis M, Begg J, Da Costa J, Blumenfeld N. A two-year follow-up study and prospective evaluation of the DSM-IV Axis V. Psychiatr Serv 2003, 54:1028-1030. 10.1176/appi.ps.54.7.1028, 12851442.
30. Jones SH, Thorncroft G, Coffey M, Dung G. A brief mental health outcome scale reliability and validity of the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). Br J Psychiatry 1995, 166:654-659. 10.1192/bjp.166.5.654, 7620753.
31. Patterson DA, Lee M-S. Field trial of the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale - Modified. Am J Psychiatry 1995, 152:1386-1388.
32. Robert P, Aubin V, Dumarcet M, Braccini T, Souetre E, Darcourt G. Effect of symptoms on the assessment of social functioning: comparison between Axis V of DSM III-R and the psychosocial aptitude rating scale. Eur Psychiatry 1991, 6:67-71.
33. Roy-Byrne P, Dagadakis C, Unutzer J, Ries R. Evidence for limited validity of the revised Global Assessment of Functioning Scale. Psychiatr Serv 1996, 47:864-866.
34. Tungström S, Söderberg P, Armelius B. Relationship between the Global Assessment of Functioning and other DSM Axes in routine clinical work. Psychiatr Serv 2005, 56:439-443. 10.1176/appi.ps.56.4.439, 15812094.
35. Bacon SF, Collins MJ, Plake EV. Does the Global Assessment of Functioning assess functioning?. J Ment Health Counseling 2002, 24:202-212.
36. Parker G, O'Donell M, Hadzi-Pavlovic D, Roberts M. Assessing outcome in community mental health patients: a comparative analysis of measures. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2002, 48:11-19. 10.1177/002076402128783046, 12008903.
37. Bird HR, Canino G, Rubio-Stipec M, Ribera JC. Further measures of the psychometric properties of the Children's Global Assessment Scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1987, 44:821-824.
38. Cooper H. Synthesizing research. A guide for literature reviews 1998, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications.
39. Hunt DL, McKibbon KA. Locating and appraising systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med 1997, 126:532-538.
40. Oxman AD. Systematic reviews: checklists for review articles. BMJ 1994, 309:648-651. 2541456, 8086990.
41. Egger M, Jüni P, Bartlett C, Holenstein F, Sterne J. How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study. Health Technol Assess 2003, 7:1-76.
42. Montori VM, Wilczynski NL, Morgan D, Haynes RB. Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytic survey. BMJ 2005, 330:68-73. 10.1136/bmj.38336.804167.47, 543864, 15619601.
43. Shojania KG, Bero LA. Taking advantage of the explosion of systematic reviews: an efficient MEDLINE search strategy. Effect Clin Pract 2001, 4:157-162.
44. Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB. Optimal search strategies for indetifying mental health content in Medline: an analytic survey. Ann Gen Psychiatry 2006, 5:4. 10.1186/1744-859X-5-4, 1440861, 16556313.
45. Young FW. Scaling. Ann Rev Psychol 1984, 35:55-81.
46. Bech P, Malt UF, Dencker SJ, Ahlfors UG, Elgen K, Lewander T, Lundell A, Simpson GM, Lingjærde O. Scales for assessment of diagnosis and severity of mental disorders. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1993, 87(Suppl 372):3-86.
47. Breakwell G, Millward L. Basic evaluation methods 1995, Leicester, UK: British Psychological Society Books.
48. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory 1994, New York, USA: McGraw-Hill Inc.
49. Widiger TA, Clark LE. Toward DSM-V and the classification of psychopathology. Psychol Bull 2000, 126:946-963. 10.1037/0033-2909.126.6.946, 11107884.
50. McColl E, Jacoby A, Thomas L, Soutter J, Bamford C, Steen N, Thomas R, Harvey E, Garrat A, Bond J. Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practise applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients. Health Technol Assess 2001, 5:31.
51. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use 1994, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
52. Hansagi H, Allebeck P. Enkät och intervju inom hälso- och sjukvård. Handbok för forskning och utvecklingsarbete [Questionnaires and interviews in healthcare. Handbook for research and development] 1994, Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
53. Bowling A. Measuring disease. A review of disease-specific quality of life measurement scales 1997, Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
54. Lingjærde O, Bech P, Malt U, Dencker SJ, Elgen K, Ahlfors UG. Skalaer for diagnostikk og sykdomsgradering ved psykiatriske tilstander. Del 1: Metodologiske aspekter [Diagnostic scales and disease grading in psychiatry. Part 1: Methodologic aspects]. Nord J Psychiatry 1989, 43(Suppl 19):1-39.
55. Gonella JS. Clinical criteria for disease staging 1983, Santa Barbara, CA, USA: Systemetrics Inc.
56. McGorry PD, Hickie JB, Yung AR, Pantelis C, Jackson HJ. Clinical staging of psychiatric disorders: a heuristic framework for choosing earlier, safer and more effective interventions. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2006, 40:616-622.
57. McGorry PD. Issues for DSM-V: clinical staging: a heuristic pathway to valid nosology and safer, more effective treatment in psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry 2007, 164:859-860. 10.1176/appi.ajp.164.6.859, 17541042.
58. Bjelland I, Dahl A. Dimensjonal diagnostikk - ny klassifisering av psykiske lidelser [Dimensional diagnostics - new classification of mental disorders]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2008, 128:1541-1543.
59. First MB. Clinical utility: a prerequisite for the adoption of a dimensional approach in DSM. J Abnorm Psychol 2005, 114:560-564. 10.1037/0021-843X.114.4.560, 16351379.
60. Regier DA. Dimensional approaches to psychiatric classification: refining the research agenda for DSM-V: an introduction. Int J Meth Psychiatr Res 2007, 16(Suppl 1):S1-S5.
61. Gift AG. Visual analogue scales: measurement of subjective phenomena. Nurs Res 1989, 38:286-288. 10.1097/00006199-198909000-00006, 2678015.
62. Sutherland HJ, Dunn V, Boyd NF. Measurement of values for states of health with linear analog scales. Med Decis Making 1983, 3:477-87. 10.1177/0272989X8300300406, 6668992.
63. Moos RH, Nichol AC, Moos BS. Global Assessment of Functioning ratings and the allocation and outcomes of mental health services. Psychiatr Serv 2002, 53:730-737. 10.1176/appi.ps.53.6.730, 12045311.
64. Schrader G, Gordon M, Harcourt R. The usefulness of DSM-III Axis IV and Axis V assessments. Am J Psychiatry 1986, 143:904-907.
65. Rabinowitz J, Modai I, Inbar-Saban N. Understanding who improves after psychiatric hospitalization. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1993, 89:152-158.
66. Thomson JW, Burns BJ, Goldman HH, Smith J. Initial level of care and clinical status in a managed mental health program. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1992, 43:599-603.
67. Van Gastel A, Schotte C, Maes M. The prediction of suicidal intent in depressed patients. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1997, 96:254-259. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1997.tb10160.x, 9350953.
68. First MB. Mastering DSM-IV Axis V. J Pract Psychiatry Behav Health 1995, 1:258-259.
69. Aas IHM. Poliklinikker og dagkirurgi. Virksomhets-beskrivelse for ambulant helsetjeneste [Outpatient clinics and daysurgery. Describing the activity of ambulatory care] 1991, Göteborg, Sweden: NHV-rapport 1991:4, Nordic School of Public Health.
70. Seligman MEP, Csikszentmihalyi M. Positive psychology. An Introduction. Am Psychol 2000, 55:5-14. 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5, 11392865.
71. Seligman MEP, Steen TA, Park N, Peterson C. Positive psychology progress. Empirical validation of interventions. Am Psychol 2005, 60:410-421. 10.1037/0003-066X.60.5.410, 16045394.
72. Wells KB, Stewart A, Hays RD, Burnam MA, Rogers W, Daniels M, Berry S, Greenfield S, Ware J. The functioning and well-being of depressed patients. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA 1989, 262:914-919. 10.1001/jama.262.7.914, 2754791.
73. Rogers R. Handbook of diagnostic and structured interviewing 2001, New York, USA: The Guilford Press.
74. Bowling A. Measuring health. A review of quality of life measurements scales 1993, Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
75. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). 1: Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992, 30:473-483. 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002, 1593914.
76. Sederer LI, Herman R, Dickey B. The imperative of outcome assessment in psychiatry. Am J Med Qual 1995, 10:127-132. 10.1177/0885713X9501000303, 7549593.
77. Gelder M, Mayou R, Geddes J. Psychiatry 2006, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
78. Feinstein AR, Josephy BR, Wells CK. Scientific and clinical problems in indexes of functional disability. Ann Intern Med 1986, 105:413-420.
79. Vaillant GE. Mental health. Am J Psychiatry 2003, 160:1373-1384. 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.8.1373, 12900295.
80. Alaja R, Tienari P, Tuomito M, Leppävuori A, Huyse FJ, Herzog T, Malt UF, Lobo A. Patterns of comorbidity in relation to functioning (GAF) among general hospital psychiatric referrals. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1999, 99:135-140. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1999.tb07211.x, 10082189.
81. Phelan M, Wykes T, Goldman H. Global function scales. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1994, 29:205-211. 10.1007/BF00796379, 7992144.
82. Rey JM, Starling J, Weaver C, Dossetor DR, Plapp JM. Inter-rater reliability of global assessment of functioning in a clinical setting. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1995, 36:787-792. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1995.tb01329.x, 7559845.
83. Kennedy JA. Mastering the Kennedy axis V. A new psychiatric assessment of patient functioning 2003, Washington DC, USA: American Psychiatric Publishing Inc.
84. Mezzich JE, Fabrega H, Coffman GA. Multiaxial characterization of depressive patients. J Nerv Ment Dis 1987, 175:339-346. 10.1097/00005053-198706000-00003, 3585310.
85. Michels R, Siebel U, Freyberger HJ, Stieglitz R-D, Schaub RT, Dilling H. The multiaxial system of ICD-10: evaluation of a preliminary draft in a multicentric field trial. Psychopathology 1996, 29:347-356. 10.1159/000285017, 8994279.
86. Hilsenroth MJ, Ackerman SJ, Blagys MD, Price JL. Dr. Hilsenroth and colleagues reply. Am J Psychiatry 2001, 158:1936-1937.
87. Goodman R, Iervolino AC, Collishaw S, Pickles A, Maughan B. Seemingly minor changes to a questionnaire can make a big difference to mean scores: a cautionary tale. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2007, 42:322-327. 10.1007/s00127-007-0169-0, 17334898.
88. Hunsley J, Mash EJ. Evidence-based assessment. Ann Rev Clin Psychol 2007, 3:29-51.
89. Bern DJ. Writing a review article for. Psychological Bulletin 1995, 118:172-177.
90. Conn VS, Isaramalai S, Rath S, Jantarakupt P, Wadhawan R, Dash Y. Beyond Medline for literature searches. J Nurs Schol 2003, 35:177-182.
91. Hopewell S, Clarke M, Lefebvre C, Scherer R. Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007, 2:MR000001.
92. Watson RJD, Richardson PH. Accessing the literature on outcome studies in group psychotherapy: the sensitivity and precision of Medline and PsycINFO bibliographic database searching. Br J Med Psychol 1999, 72:127-134. 10.1348/000711299159763, 10194578.
93. Crumley ET, Wiebe N, Cramer K, Klassen TP, Hartling L. Which resources should be used to identify RCT/CCTs for systematic reviews: a systematic review. Med Res Methodol 2005, 5:24.
94. Lawrence DW. What is lost when searching only one literature database for articles relevant to injury prevention and safety promotion?. Inj Prev 2008, 14:401-404. 10.1136/ip.2008.019430, 19074247.
95. Arnold SJ, Bender VF, Brown SA. A review and comparison of psychology-related electronic resources. J Elect Res Med Lib 2006, 3:61-79.
96. Friis S, Melle I, Opjordsmoen S, Retterstøl N. Global assessment scale and Health Sickness Rating Scale: problems in comparing the global functioning scores across investigations. Psychother Res 1993, 3:105-114.