Antegrade ureteral stenting during laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: intraoperative findings and long-term outcome

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 551-555

  El Feel, Ahmed Sobhy ^a   Abdel Hakim, Mahmoud Amr ^a   Abouel Fettouh, Hazem Ibrahim ^a   Abdel Hakim, Amr Mahmoud ^a  

^a CAIRO UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; ANTEGRADE URETER STENT; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BLOOD VESSEL; BODY MASS; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DOUBLE J URETER STENT; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; FOLLOW UP; HEMATURIA; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LAPAROSCOPIC DISMEMBERED PYELOPLASTY; LENGTH OF STAY; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYELOPLASTY; RETROGRADE URETER STENT; SCHOOL CHILD; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETER STENT; URETHRAL CATHETERIZATION; URINE INCONTINENCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; DEMOGRAPHY; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; LAPAROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; STENTS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETER; UROGRAPHY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77951941160     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2009.0427     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, et al. Laparo-scopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 1993;150:1795.
2. Kavoussi LR, Peters CA. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Urol 1993;150:1891.
3. Mandhani A, Goel S, Bhandari M. Is antegrade stenting superior to retrograde stenting in laparoscopic pyeloplasty? J Urol 2004;171:1440-1442.
4. Chandrasekharam VS. Is retrograde stenting more reliable than antegrade stenting for pyeloplasty in infants and children? Urology 2005;66:1301-1304.
5. Arumainayagam N, Minervini A, Davenport K, et al. Antegrade stenting versus retrograde stenting in laparo-scopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol 2007;22:671-674.
6. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: Five year experience. Ann Surg 2009;250:187-196.
7. Bauer JJ, Bishoff JT, Moore RG, et al. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: Assessment of objective and subjective outcome. J Urol 1999;162:692.
8. Klingler HC, Remzi M, Janetschek G, et al. Comparison of open versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Techniques in treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction. Eur Urol 2003;44:340.
9. Bonnard A, Fouquet V, Carricaburu E, et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children. J Urol 2005;173:1710.
10. Jarrett TW, Chan DY, Charambura TC, et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: The first 100 cases. J Urol 2002;167:1253.
11. Bachmann A, Ruszat R, Forster T, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Solving the technical difficulties. Eur Urol 2006;49:264.
12. Gettman MT, Peschel R, Neururer R, et al. A comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed with da Vinci robotic system versus standard laparoscopic techniques: Initial clinical results. Eur Urol 2002;42:453.
13. Soulie M, Salomon L, Patard JJ, et al. Extraperitoneal lapa-roscopic pyeloplasty: A multicenter study of 55 procedures. J Urol 2001;166:48.
14. Turk IA, Davis JW, Winkelmann B, et al. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty-The method of choice in the presence of an enlarged renal pelvis and crossing vessels. Eur Urol 2002;42:268.
15. Sundaram CP, Grubb III RL, Rehman J, et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 2003;169:2037.
16. Eden C, Gianduzzo T, Chang C, et al. Extraperitoneal lap-aroscopic pyeloplasty for primary and secondary ureter-opelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 2004;172:2308.
17. Davenport K, Minervini A, Timoney AG, et al. Our experience with retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction. Eur Urol 2005;48:973.